Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Increased Partisan Opposition in Kagan Confirmation Vote Continues Historical Trend

Bookmark and Share

Six of the last seven presidents have faced increased opposition to get their second SCOTUS justice seated; Kagan receives third most 'nay' votes among successful nominees in history

Elena Kagan's confirmation to the U.S. Supreme Court by the U.S. Senate Thursday by a 63-37 vote may not have come as a surprise to anyone in Washington, D.C., but the (historically) high level of opposition against her confirmation was predicted here at Smart Politics after her nomination in mid-May.

Three months ago, Smart Politics observed that since Woodrow Wilson, U.S. presidents have faced increased opposition from the Senate to get their second Supreme Court Justice seated - with only one such nominee receiving greater support from the chamber during this nearly 100-year span (FDR's Hugo Black).

In light of the fact that nominees of five of the last six presidents since Lyndon Johnson prior to Obama had received more 'nay' votes than their successful predecessor, Smart Politics predicted that Kagan would receive greater opposition from the Senate than Obama's first seated Justice, Sonia Sotomayor - a prediction made even though Sotomayor had received the third most 'nay' votes for a successful seated nominee in U.S. history at that time (with 31).

With 37 votes cast against her confirmation, Kagan now holds the mark for the third largest number of 'nay' votes received by a successful nominee, behind only Clarence Thomas in October 1991 (48) and Samuel Alito in January 2006 (42).

When taking into account the changing number of seats in the U.S. Senate across history as well as variations in the number of Senators voting on confirmation, the 37.0 percent opposition to Kagan marks the sixth largest opposition against a successful nominee in U.S. history, behind James Garfield's Stanley Matthews (48.9 percent), Thomas (48.0 percent), James Buchanan's Nathan Clifford (46.9 percent), Grover Cleveland's Lucias Lamar (46.7 percent), and Alito (42.0 percent).

Largest Opposition to Confirmed U.S. Supreme Court Nominees (Percent)*

Justice
President
Year
Vote
% Oppose
Stanley Matthews
Garfield
1881
24-23
48.9
Clarence Thomas
Bush 41
1991
52-48
48.0
Nathan Clifford
Buchanan
1858
26-23
46.9
Lucius Lamar
Cleveland
1888
32-28
46.7
Samuel Alito
Bush 43
2006
58-42
42.0
Elena Kagan
Obama
2010
63-37
37.0
John Catron
Van Buren
1837
28-15
34.9
Mahlon Pitney
Taft
1912
50-26
34.2
Roger Taney
Jackson
1836
29-15
34.1
Charles Hughes
Hoover
1930
52-26
33.3
Melville Fuller
Cleveland
1888
41-20
32.8
Louis Brandeis
Wilson
1916
47-22
31.9
Sonia Sotomayor
Obama
2009
68-31
31.3
William Rehnquist
Nixon
1971
68-26
27.7
Philip Barbour
Jackson
1836
30-11
26.7
* Excludes confirmed justices who never served on the bench (e.g. William Smith in 1837, 38.3 percent). Data compiled by Smart Politics.

The increase of opposition of six votes and 5.1 percentage points from Sotomayor to Kagan means that opposition to presidential attempts to seat their second nominee has now increased for six of the last seven such presidents:

· Lyndon Johnson's first seated Justice on the Court, his friend Abe Fortas, was confirmed easily by a voice vote. His next pick, Thurgood Marshall, would become the first black Justice on the Court, but not before many of the Southern Senators from the President's own party (along with newly converted Republican Strom Thurmond) opposed Marshall's confirmation. Marshall was confirmed with 86 percent of the vote (69-11), although 20 Senators in the chamber did not cast a vote.

· Richard Nixon's first nominee, the conservative-leaning Warren Burger, received the confirmation of 96 percent of voting Senators (74-3) - the largest support received by a nominee via a roll call vote since Ulysses S. Grant nominee Morrison Waite in 1874 (63-0). Nixon was not so lucky on his next choice, Clement Haynsworth. Haynsworth was rejected by the Senate, receiving the support of 45 percent of the body (45-55), due largely to his anti-labor leanings, possible conflict of interest in votes cast while on the 4th Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals, and for his lack of support on civil rights issues.

· George H.W. Bush saw his first nominee, David Souter, pass through the Senate with 91 percent of the vote (90-9). Bush's next pick, Clarence Thomas, escaped with just 52 percent of the vote (52-48) - the narrowest successful confirmation since John Garfield's nominee, Stanley Matthews, was confirmed with 51 percent of the vote in 1881 (24-23). It took 107 days from Thomas' nomination on July 1, 1991 until his confirmation vote on October 15th that autumn. Thomas' confirmation was nearly blocked by critics for his very brief experience as a judge, his suspected conservative leanings on abortion and affirmative action, and, of course, attorney Anita Hill's allegations of sexual harassment.

· Bill Clinton's first nominee, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, was confirmed with 97 percent of the vote (96-3). Only Republicans Jesse Helms (NC), Don Nickles (OK), and Bob Smith (NH) opposed her. Clinton's next nominee, Stephen Breyer, had three times as many votes cast against him, but was still confirmed with 91 percent of the vote (87-9). A group of nine Republicans, including Helms, Nickles, and Smith, cast the 'nay' votes. The period from Ginsburg's nomination to confirmation took just 58 days compared to 83 days for Breyer.

· George W. Bush's first seated Justice, John Roberts, was confirmed by 78 percent of the Senate (78-22). Bush's next nominee, Harriet Miers, turned out to be an unqualified disaster for the President - receiving strong criticisms from both Democrats and Republicans alike for her perceived lack of knowledge on constitutional law, her lack of experience as a judge, and her personal ties to the president. Opposition was so strong that her nominations was withdrawn before the confirmation hearings began.

Only Ronald Reagan bucked this trend with his first (Sandra Day O'Connor, 99-0) and second (Antonin Scalia, 98-0) seated justices both emerging without a single 'nay' vote cast against them.

Fate of Recent Presidential Attempts to Get Second Justice Seated on the Supreme Court

President
1st Confirmed
Result
Next nominee
Result
Obama
Sotomayor
68-31
Kagan
63-37
Bush 43
Roberts
78-22
Miers
Withdrew
Clinton
Ginsburg
96-3
Breyer
87-9
Bush 41
Souter
90-9
Thomas
52-48
Reagan
O’Connor
99-0
Scalia
98-0
Nixon
Burger
74-3
Haynsworth
45-55
LBJ
Fortas
Voice vote
Marshall
69-11
Table compiled by Smart Politics.

With important midterm elections just around the corner and Obama's own approval rating down 11 points from a year ago in Gallup's daily tracking poll (45 approve to 48 disapprove today versus 56 approve to 37 disapprove a year ago), it was also perhaps a bit easier for Republicans (and one Democrat) to vote against Obama's second Supreme Court justice today.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Humphrey Institute Event to Feature Minnesota Journalist Political Fact-Checkers
Next post: Is Winning a Contested Primary in Minnesota a Path to General Election Success?

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Which States Have the Longest and Shortest Election Day Voting Hours?

Residents in some North Dakota towns have less than half as many hours to cast their ballots as those in New York State.

Political Crumbs

Does My Key Still Work?

Much has been made about Charlie Crist's political transformation from Republican to independent to Democrat en route to winning the Florida GOP and Democratic gubernatorial nominations over a span of eight years. Party-switching aside, Crist is also vying to become just the second Florida governor to serve two interrupted terms. Democrat William Bloxham was the first - serving four year terms from 1881 to 1885 and then 1897 to 1901. Florida did not permit governors serving consecutive terms for most of its 123 years prior to changes made in its 1968 constitution. Since then four have done so: Democrats Reubin Askew, Bob Graham, and Lawton Chiles and Republican Jeb Bush.


No 100-Year Curse for Roberts

Defeating his Tea Party primary challenger Milton Wolf with just 48.1 percent of the vote, Pat Roberts narrowly escaped becoming the first elected U.S. Senator from Kansas to lose a renomination bid in 100 years. The last - and so far only - elected U.S. Senator to lose a Kansas primary was one-term Republican Joseph Bristow in 1914. Bristow was defeated by former U.S. Senator Charles Curtis who went on to win three terms before becoming Herbert Hoover's running mate in 1928. Only one other U.S. Senator from the Sunflower State has lost a primary since the passage of the 17th Amendment: Sheila Frahm in 1996. Frahm was appointed to fill Bob Dole's seat earlier that year and finished 13.2 points behind Sam Brownback in the three-candidate primary field. Overall, incumbent senators from Kansas have won 29 times against two defeats in the direct vote era. (Curtis also lost a primary in 1912 to Walter Stubbs, one year before the nation moved to direct elections).


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting