Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


No Recipe for Success for Murkowski Write-In Campaign in Alaska

Bookmark and Share

No Alaskan candidate for statewide office has won more than 27 percent in a write-in campaign; Senator Ernest Gruening's model for potential Murkowski write-in candidacy netted just 17 percent in 1968

Republican Lisa Murkowski's odds to retain her U.S. Senate seat from Alaska past January 2011 just got a little more grim on Monday, as the state's Libertarian Party voted unanimously not to allow the two-term Senator to run on its ballot line should she lose the GOP primary to upstart candidate Joe Miller.

Miller is currently leading Murkowski by less than 1,700 votes with several thousand absentee ballots yet to be counted.

But although a Republican primary loss ended the long political career of her father Frank Murkowski in his 2006 bid for a second term as governor, there is chatter Senator Murkowski might consider a write-in candidacy this November to win a third term in D.C.

The problem for Murkowski is not simply that only one U.S. Senator in history has been elected via a write-in campaign (Strom Thurmond won 63.1 percent of the vote in South Carolina's 1954 Senate race).

The problem is that Alaska politicians have already attempted this feat for statewide offices several times over the past 50 years without success.

A Smart Politics analysis of data from the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives and State of Alaska Division of Elections finds there have been eight general election write-in campaigns for statewide office in Alaska over the past 26 election cycles dating back to 1958.

Two of these campaigns were for U.S. Senate seats.

The first occurred in 1958, when the Last Frontier State elected its inaugural pair of U.S. Senators. During the election for its Class II seat, Keith Capper received 599 write-in votes (1.2 percent) to place third out of three candidates in a race won by Democrat Bob Bartlett.

The other case involves Alaska's other inaugural Senator, Democrat Ernest Gruening, who was formerly a Territorial Governor of Alaska from 1939 to 1953.

Gruening, a longtime opponent of the Vietnam War who was one of two Senators to vote against the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution in 1964, was reelected in 1962 with 58 percent of the vote, but failed to receive his party's nomination in 1968.

Gruening won 47.1 percent of the Democratic primary vote held that August, losing to Alaska's Speaker of the House Mike Gravel by 5.8 points.

Senator Gruening did not exit quietly, however, and launched a write-in campaign that netted him 14,118 votes on Election Day, winning 17.4 percent of the vote for third place out of three candidates, with Gravel prevailing.

It has now been 42 years since Gruening's failed write-in candidacy - the last such attempt for a U.S. Senate seat in Alaska.

Senator Murkowski is the current holder of Gruening's old Class III Senate seat.

But in the meantime there have also been six gubernatorial write-in candidacies in Alaska, beginning with that of a former Governor, Wally Hickel, in 1978.

Nearly 10 years after he resigned as Alaska's second governor to become Richard Nixon's Secretary of the Interior, Hickel launched a write-in campaign for his old job in 1978.

Hickel had lost the GOP primary that August by a mere 98 votes to his political rival, Jay Hammond. (Hickel had also previously lost the 1974 Republican primary to Hammond, but by a much wider margin of 7,874 votes).

In the 1978 general election, Hickel was able to notch a state record that still stands today, winning 26.4 percent of the vote as a write-in candidate (33,555 votes). Hickel placed second out of five candidates, 12.6 points behind Hammond.

Eight years later, in 1986, Hickel lost his third GOP gubernatorial primary, this time to Arliss Sturgulewski by 2,007 votes.

Hickel went on to receive 4,958 write-in votes (2.8 percent) in that November's general election won by Democrat Steve Cowper. Hickel's tally was good for fourth place out of six candidates, including Ed Hoch, another write-in candidate who received just 107 votes for sixth place (0.1 percent).

The last election cycle with write-in candidacies for a statewide office in Alaska took place during the 1998 gubernatorial race.

Republican State Senator Robin Taylor lost that year's GOP primary by 7,391 votes to nominee John Lindauer.

However, the Alaska Republican Party withdrew support from Lindauer just a few weeks before the general election after a dust-up involving the source of Lindauer's campaign funding. The GOP then backed Taylor as a write-in candidate.

Taylor did win 40,209 write-in votes - the most in state history - but his 18.3 percent showing was far behind that of one-term Democratic incumbent, Tony Knowles, who won with 51.3 percent of the vote.

Taylor came in second place among eight candidates, including write-in candidates Wayne Ross (801 votes, 0.4 percent, 7th place), who had come in a close third in the GOP primary, and Nick Begich, Jr. (579 votes, 0.3 percent, 8th place).

Of course, Senator Murkowski will not need to be in a position to make history if she can make up enough ground during the counting of absentee ballots in the coming days.

Write-In Candidacies in Alaskan Statewide General Elections, 1958-2008

Year
Candidate
Office
Votes
Percent
Place
1958
Keith Capper
US Senate
599
1.2
3 of 3
1968
Ernest Gruening
US Senate
14,118
17.4
3 of 3
1978
Wally Hickel
Governor
33,555
26.4
2 of 5
1986
Wally Hickel
Governor
4,958
2.8
4 of 6
1986
Ed Hoch
Governor
107
0.1
6 of 6
1998
Robin Taylor
Governor
40,209
18.3
2 of 8
1998
Wayne Ross
Governor
801
0.4
7 of 8
1998
Nick Begich, Jr.
Governor
579
0.3
8 of 8
Sources: Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives; State of Alaska Division of Elections. Table compiled by Smart Politics.


Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Which States Host the Most Competitive Gubernatorial Elections?
Next post: Wayzata: The Hamptons of Minnesota?

4 Comments


  • Good post.

    It's worth noting that not only did the write-in candidates lose, but they also failed to bring about the defeat of the candidate who'd beaten them in the primary. In 1968, Gravel won despite Gruening's write-in candidacy; in 1978, Hammond won despite Hickel's write-in candidacy.

    In 1986, Sturgelewski would have lost in November even had she received all of Hickel's votes, as she finished more than 8,000 votes behind Steve Cowper.

    Finally, in 1998, Knowles won with a majority; hence, Taylor and Ross can't claim credit for defeating Lindauer by splitting the vote.

    Thus, even if Murkowski's goal is only to defeat Miller, rather than to win, history suggests that she's kidding herself.

  • 52% of Alaska voters are registered independent (undeclared and non-partisan). Murkowski is extremely popular among independents that do not tend to vote in primaries because they are "party" popularity contests. Consider that Dems make up 15% of registerd voters in Alaska and Reps make up a mere 26%.

    Also consider that Miller is "far" right and McAdams is considered "left". Murkowski can successfully corner the market with the majority of voters in Alaska that tend to vote for the best person regardless of party affiliation.

    Strom Thurmond won a Senate Write in election in 1954. The post is historically correct, but neglects to mention that all polls indicate the Murkowski has higher favorable ratings among Alaska voters than either the democratic or republican nominee.

  • There have been 2 winners in U.S. history to the U.S. Senate in general elections. Besides Strom Thurmond in 1954, there was William F. Knowland in California's special US Senate in November 1946, for the two month term.

  • Excellent article!! If you look at my latest blog, you'll see that the vote count is a lot closer than most people think. You'd be surprised to know how many people were duped (by libs) into writing Joe Miller on the ballot and filling in the oval.... those votes won't count for Joe, or Lisa, they'll be tossed... for more check out my blog and tell me what you think.. http://bit.ly/9h4kDU

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Which States Have the Longest and Shortest Election Day Voting Hours?

    Residents in some North Dakota towns have less than half as many hours to cast their ballots as those in New York State.

    Political Crumbs

    Mary Burke: English First?

    While multiculturalism and bilingualism are increasingly en vogue in some quarters as the world seemingly becomes a smaller place, one very high profile 2014 Democratic candidate does not shy away from the fact that she only speaks one language: English. In an attempt to highlight her private sector credentials working for Trek Bicycle, Wisconsin Democratic gubernatorial nominee Mary Burke boasts on her campaign bio page how she made great strides in international business dealings...while only speaking English: "Despite not speaking a single foreign language, she established sales and distribution operations in seven countries over just three years." Note: According to 2010 Census data, nearly half a million Wisconsinites over five years old speak a language other than English at home, or 8.7 percent, while 4.6 percent of Badger State residents do not speak English at all.


    Does My Key Still Work?

    Much has been made about Charlie Crist's political transformation from Republican to independent to Democrat en route to winning the Florida GOP and Democratic gubernatorial nominations over a span of eight years. Party-switching aside, Crist is also vying to become just the second Florida governor to serve two interrupted terms. Democrat William Bloxham was the first - serving four year terms from 1881 to 1885 and then 1897 to 1901. Florida did not permit governors serving consecutive terms for most of its 123 years prior to changes made in its 1968 constitution. Since then four have done so: Democrats Reubin Askew, Bob Graham, and Lawton Chiles and Republican Jeb Bush.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting