Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Tom Emmer: Running for Governor, Not Sheriff

Bookmark and Share

Emmer strikes moderate, cooperative tone in education speech at University of Minnesota's Humphrey Institute

In contrast to the firebrand image with which he is often portrayed by the Minnesota media, Republican nominee Tom Emmer offered few partisan attacks in his speech Wednesday afternoon during the second installment of the Humphrey Institute's gubernatorial candidate series.

Unlike DFL nominee Mark Dayton, who levied more than a dozen criticisms at Emmer and Independence Party nominee Tom Horner during his speech in the series on Monday, Emmer presented himself as a broker of peace between the major parties, frequently stating that the tenets of his education plan were supported by several members of both parties in St. Paul.

"Republicans and Democrats have voted for these things I'm talking about. This is not an 'us' and 'you,' this is a 'we' proposal. And rather than get into that 'Let's pick a fight out on the school playground' - let's not do that. Let's say that, look, for whatever reason, that was then, this is now. Let's start talking about how we can create an opportunity for everybody to have a win-win and success."

In fact, Emmer cited and had more complimentary comments to say about Democratic and liberal icons - such as President Barack Obama and former Supreme Court justice Louis Brandeis - than he did critical comments against his political opponents.

Regarding Obama, Emmer stated there was overlap in their principles on education policy, particularly on testing:

"Some of the things the Obama administration has put forward we absolutely agree with...I have no problem in saying, 'Kudos to you, President Obama' for promoting these (reforms)."

Unlike Dayton, Representative Emmer never once mentioned his gubernatorial opponents by name during the hour-long event, and only alluded to them once, when discussing the $400 million in cuts Emmer targeted for higher education in his budget plan:

"Out of the candidates running for this office, I'm going to be honest with you where I think the targets should be...I'll just leave it at this - a little shot, but I hope people will look at with the other two candidates running for this office - I have put all the numbers out there. Based on the plans that they've put out, the numbers don't add up, and they are going to have to put deeper cuts into higher education or other things that they're not talking about in order to make those plans work. At least we're putting them out there, so you see where we're at today."

Representative Emmer even offered softer, almost euphemistic language at times when detailing some of the more controversial elements of his education plan, such as dealing with "ineffective teachers."

Under his plan, Emmer did not say such teachers would be fired, rather, "It's time to counsel that teacher into a career change."

The one target of Emmer's criticisms during his speech and comments - again, not mentioned by name - was "union leadership" (presumably Tom Dooher, President of Education Minnesota), who Emmer observes as being "adamantly opposed" to meaningful education reforms.

"One leadership group cannot control education reform and our kids future in the State of Minnesota."

But when event moderator Professor Larry Jacobs attempted to summarize Emmer's views as, "Message from Tom Emmer to unions: There's a new sheriff in town," the Republican gubernatorial candidate resisted such a characterization.

"Here's the thing - if we do that, then everybody digs their heels in and they take immediately an adversarial approach. Rather than saying, 'There's a new sheriff in town' - I think that's the wrong way to go at it."

So, if not a sheriff, what kind of leadership style would Emmer adopt if elected governor this November?

Emmer lamented the "If you don't agree with me, you must be bad" mentality that has defined partisan politics in recent years, and believes the truth is somewhere between the two parties, who need to be able to shake hands at the end of the day after an honest, vigorous debate:

"In its basic form, Republicans believe people should be the answer to all problems. In the Democrat's view, government should play a much bigger role in solving all problems. And guess what? Neither is actually right. Somewhere in there is the answer."

Conversations with Minnesota's gubernatorial candidates will continue at the Humphrey Institute next week when Independence Party nominee Tom Horner speaks on Monday, September 20th from 12 pm to 1:15 pm.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Headlines Tell the Story: National Media Reacts to O'Donnell's GOP Primary Victory in Delaware
Next post: Wisconsin Republicans Field Candidates in Most Assembly Districts in Quarter Century

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Kevin McCarthy Becomes Least Tenured Floor Leader in US House History

At less than four terms, McCarthy has served 423 fewer days in the chamber than any floor leader in U.S. House history and almost 10 years less than the average leader.

Political Crumbs

The Second Time Around

Former Republican Congressman Bob Beauprez became the seventh major party or second place gubernatorial candidate in Colorado to get a second chance at the office when he narrowly won his party's nomination last month. Two of the previous six candidates were successful. Democrat Alva Adams lost his first gubernatorial bid to Benjamin Eaton in 1884, but was victorious two years later against William Meyer. Democrat Charles Johnson placed third in 1894 behind Republican Albert McIntyre and Populist incumbent Governor David Waite but returned as the Fusion (Democrat/Populist) nominee in 1898 and defeated GOPer Henry Wolcott. Gubernatorial candidates who received a second chance but lost both general elections include Democrat Thomas Patterson (1888, 1914), Progressive Edward Costigan (1912, 1914), Republican Donald Brotzman (1954, 1956), and Republican David Strickland (1978, 1986).


How Are the Plurality Winners Doing?

Nearly 40 percent of plurality winners of U.S. Senate elections lose their seat in the next election cycle. Will that happen to any of the three such incumbents on the ballot in 2014? Recent polling suggests Democrats Al Franken of Minnesota, Mark Begich of Alaska, and Jeff Merkley of Oregon all currently have an advantage over their nominated/frontrunning GOP opponents, but each is flirting with plurality support once again. Franken led endorsed GOPer Mike McFadden 48 to 42 percent in a new SurveyUSA poll while the polling group showed Merkley with a 50 to 32 percent advantage over Monica Wehby. Begich led each of the three major GOP candidates in last month's PPP survey: 42 to 37 percent over Daniel Sullivan, 41 to 33 percent over Mead Treadwell, and 43 to 27 percent over Joe Miller.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting