Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Vin Weber Talks Washington (And Minnesota) Politics

Bookmark and Share

Weber says GOP will net 48 or 49 seats in House, 8 seats in Senate, and Tom Horner to hit 20 percent mark in Minnesota gubernatorial race

Former Republican Congressman Vin Weber spoke at the University of Minnesota's Humphrey Institute on Thursday afternoon to discuss the nature and extent of the partisan shift to the GOP, and why it hasn't quite taken hold to such an extent in Minnesota.

Weber began his talk by explaining how Democrats misread the 2008 election by thinking the country had turned a page towards progressivism, and that it was an ideological victory for liberals, when in fact the public was just "Very anxious to see George W. Bush on a plane back to Texas."

The pullback to conservatism - and the accompanying shift to the right - has occurred faster than at any time Weber had seen in his lifetime, and he fully expects the 2010 election to be more ideologically driven than both 1980 and 1994.

The former Congressman described this shift as evidenced by a fundamental change that has taken place among the public's attitude toward spending, the federal debt, and, most importantly, the government's ability to solve problems.

And what will be the result?

Weber believes the House will flip to the GOP while Democrats will hold a narrow majority in the Senate. Weber thinks the shift to the Republicans has peaked, and he doesn't see a gain of 60 to 70 U.S. House seats like some are projecting.

The conservative D.C. insider ultimately settled at +48 or +49 seats in the House and +8 seats in the Senate for Republicans.

When asked if there was anything Democrats could do to reverse the course of public opinion in time for the November election, Weber recounted an axiom told to him by someone on the Hill in the 1970s: "The cake is in the oven by the Fourth of July."

In short, the macropolitics are in place and can't be undone in a couple months.

But Weber doesn't believe it will be business as usual when the new Congress convenes in January. He said there won't simply be new faces and more Republicans, but a new attitude, particularly towards spending.

Incumbents who do survive are going to look at their new colleagues, and those who lost their primary or general elections, and wonder what spending bill will do them in the next election cycle.

As a result, Weber believes it is going to be difficult to pass appropriations bills.

But Weber didn't paint a completely rosy picture for the GOP, noting how the Tea Party phenomenon has "hurt" Republicans in U.S. Senate races - probably costing them control of the upper legislative chamber.

Weber disagreed with the Party's view about illegal immigration's negative impact on the U.S economy and how candidates such as Rand Paul, while "not a stupid man," has nonetheless revealed many Tea Party candidates to be "not politically sophisticated."

Turning to Minnesota politics, the former Congressman restated his support for Tom Emmer in the gubernatorial race, but acknowledged the GOPer had a bad campaign from May to early July. Weber thinks Emmer's support has dipped as low as it can possibly go, and that he will move up in the polls in the coming weeks.

Weber also expects Independence Party nominee Tom Horner will gain another five to eight points and hit the 20 percent mark.

While Weber says Horner's decision to put forth specific budget proposals does set him apart as the "wonk"-ish candidate, he believes it will be difficult for Minnesotans to vote for someone who will propose installing a tax on clothing for the first time in state history.

Weber believes most of Horner's forthcoming bump is going to come at the expense of DFLer Mark Dayton, to whom he ascribed as having an "erratic background."

But why isn't Emmer running away with the race, given the clear national momentum toward the Republican Party?

To this, Weber says the intensity among a number of issues is not being felt as strongly in Minnesota because there is not a U.S. Senate candidate on the ballot, and, as such, national issues are not having as much of an impact on state politics. Weber also acknowledges the fact that the Gopher State has had a Republican governor for eight years has also played a role (as such, the GOP is not as immune from criticism of the state's woes as on the national scene).

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Call On Me! Which Reporters and News Organizations Have the President's Ear at Press Conferences?
Next post: Will Miller-Meeks Become the First Iowa Woman Elected to Congress?

1 Comment


  • I think Vin may be right about parts, but describing the national mood as a pullback to conservativism ignores the fact that today's Republican politicians are not "conservative," but merely "reactionary." They only know how to oppose unpopular issues, but not how to build consensus or how to govern. They are thermometers, not thermostats. Like Tom Emmer, most of their issues amount to pandering. Tom is now for a small business tax credit he voted against. He is for the Minnesota GI bill, although he voted against it. He is for stadiums and passenger rail he vehemently opposed. These reactionaries believe government is incapable of fixing our roads or taking criminals off of our streets, so they are pandering to get elected and prove it.

    If the public wants to know their candidates' true intentions, they must follow the money that gets them elected. Unfortunately, donations are more important than election promises and they are often ignored by the voters.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Gender Equality in the US House: A State-by State Quarter-Century Report Card (1989-2014)

    A study of 5,325 congressional elections finds the number of female U.S. Representatives has more than tripled over the last 25 years, but the rate at which women are elected to the chamber still varies greatly between the states.

    Political Crumbs

    Small Club in St. Paul

    Mark Dayton is one of just three Minnesotans ever elected to three different statewide offices. Dayton, of course, had previously served as State Auditor (1991-1995) and U.S. Senator (2001-2007) before winning the governorship in 2010. At that time, he joined Republicans Edward Thye and J.A.A. Burnquist on this very short list. Burnquist was elected lieutenant governor in 1914 but then became governor after the death of Democrat Winfield Hammond in 1915. He then won the gubernatorial elections of 1916 and 1918 and eight terms as attorney general two decades later (1939-1955). Thye was similarly first elected lieutenant governor of the Gopher State and became governor after the resignation of fellow GOPer Harold Stasson in 1943. Thye won one additional full term as governor in 1944 and then two terms to the U.S. Senate (1947-1959). Twenty Minnesotans have been elected to two different statewide offices.


    Respect Your Elders?

    With retirement announcements this year by veteran U.S. Representatives such as 30-term Democrat John Dingell of Michigan, 20-term Democrat George Miller of California, and 18-term Republican Tom Petri of Wisconsin, it is no surprise that retirees from the 113th Congress are one of the most experienced cohorts in recent decades. Overall, these 24 exiting members of the House have served an average of 11.0 terms - the second longest tenure among retirees across the last 18 cycles since 1980. Only the U.S. Representatives retiring in 2006 had more experience, averaging 11.9 terms. (In that cycle, 10 of the 11 retiring members served at least 10 terms, with GOPer Bill Jenkins of Tennessee the lone exception at just five). Even without the aforementioned Dingell, the average length of service in the chamber of the remaining 23 retirees in 2014 is 10.2 terms - which would still be the third highest since 1980 behind the 2006 and 2012 (10.5 terms) cycles.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting