Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Humphrey Institute Event to Examine Impact of Citizens United

Bookmark and Share

On Tuesday afternoon, the University of Minnesota's Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs will host an event analyzing the impact of the recent Citizens United case, in which the Supreme Court overturned by a 5-4 margin earlier this year the prohibition of corporations and unions from spending money to support (or criticize) political candidates, such as through television advertising.

"Post Citizens United: What Corporate Contributions Mean for Our Political System," will include panelists from Common Cause Minnesota, Alliance for a Better Minnesota, and the executive director of the Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board.

The event will be held:

Tuesday, October 12th, 2010
12-1:15 p.m.
Cowles Auditorium, Humphrey Institute
301 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis

From the Center for the Study of Politics and Governance's press release:

"Businesses, unions, and political activists are taking advantage of a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision to plow large amounts of cash into campaign ads. How has the Supreme Court's Citizens United case changed the landscape of political fundraising and advertising in Minnesota in 2010? Has one candidate been particularly helped by Citizens United?

Please join us for a lively conversation about the new political system introduced by Citizens United. The panelists include Denis Cardinal from Alliance for a Better Minnesota, Ben Golnik from Golnik Strategies, Gary Goldsmith, executive director of the Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board, and Mike Dean, director of Common Cause Minnesota. The event will be moderated by Professor Larry Jacobs."

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: From the Yankees to the Jets: Will the Vikings End Minnesota's New York Curse Tonight?
Next post: Republicans Positioned to Win Nine Midwestern U.S. Senate Seats for First Time Since 1920

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Plurality-Winning Governors Elected At Century-Long High Water Mark

The rate of gubernatorial candidates elected without the support of a majority of voters is at its highest level since the 1910s.

Political Crumbs

Seeing Red

Congressman Nick Rahall's failed bid for a 20th term in West Virginia this cycle, combined with a narrow loss by Nick Casey to Alex Mooney in Shelley Moore Capito's open seat, means that West Virginia Democrats will be shut out of the state's U.S. House delegation for the first time in over 90 years. The Republican sweep by two-term incumbent David McKinley in the 1st CD, Mooney in the 2nd, and Evan Jenkins over Rahall in the 3rd marks the first time the GOP has held all seats in the chamber from West Virginia since the Election of 1920. During the 67th Congress (1921-1923) all six seats from the state were controlled by the GOP. Since the Election of 1922, Democrats have won 76 percent of all U.S. House elections in the Mountain State - capturing 172 seats compared to 54 for the GOP.


Home Field Advantage?

When the 114th Congress convenes in a few days, Maine will be represented by one home-grown U.S. Representative: Waterville-born Republican Bruce Poliquin. With the departure of Millinocket-born Mike Michaud, who launched a failed gubernatorial bid, the Pine Tree State was poised to send a House delegation to D.C. without any Maine-born members for the first time since 1821. Three-term U.S. Rep. Chellie Pingree (born in Minnesota) coasted to reelection as expected, however Poliquin edged Kentucky-born Emily Cain by 5.3 points to keep the streak alive. Since 1876, a total of 208 of the 222 candidates elected to the nation's lower legislative chamber from the state have been born in Maine, or 94 percent.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting