Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


PAC Dogs: Oberstar and Peterson Receive More than Half Their Money from Special Interests

Bookmark and Share

PAC contributions to Paulsen up 36 percent from 2008 cycle; contributions to Bachmann down 51.2 percent

While national and statewide media interest in Minnesota congressional fundraising has spiked during the last few weeks, what with the jaw-dropping contributions reeled in by Michele Bachmann and the eye-opening lack of funds raised in-district by Jim Oberstar, there are other fundraising trends bubbling beneath the surface.

Smart Politics finds special interest PAC money to Minnesota's eight congressional incumbents is down more than a half a million dollars this election cycle, or 10.4 percent, compared to the first seven quarters of the 2007-2008 campaign.

Still, Minnesota's two most influential members of Congress, Committee Chairmen Jim Oberstar and Collin Peterson, are collecting more than half of their fundraising through special interest money.

PAC Money Received in 2008 and 2010 Election Cycles by Minnesota U.S. Representatives

Candidate
District
2007-2008
2009-2010
% Change
Oberstar
MN-08
$1,018,589
$843,690
-17.2
Peterson
MN-07
$777,566
$833,000
+7.1
Paulsen
MN-03
$563,539
$766,468
+36.0
Kline
MN-02
$529,665
$587,610
+10.9
Walz
MN-01
$844,496
$627,071
-25.7
Bachmann
MN-06
$839,978
$410,062
-51.2
McCollum
MN-04
$334,680
$326,182
-2.5
Ellison
MN-05
$296,619
$268,841
-9.4
Average
 
$5,205,132
$4,662,924
-10.4
Note: Through September 30th of the 2008 and 2010 election cycles. FEC data compiled by Smart Politics.

Oberstar, who heads the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, leads the way with $843,690 in PAC receipts through the end of September.

While that is tops in the delegation, it is down 17.2 percent from this stage of the 2008 cycle, when the 18-term DFLer had notched over $1 million in PAC funds.

In each of the last two election cycles, PAC money was the largest source of Oberstar's campaign funds - 55.6 percent in 2008 and 52.0 percent in 2010.

Peterson, Chair of the Agriculture Committee, is next with $833,000 - up 7.1 percent from this stage of his 2008 campaign and just $10K shy of catching his colleague from the 8th CD.

Peterson by far raises the largest percentage of his campaign funds from special interests, with 78.6 percent of his 2010 fundraising coming from PACs (up from 73.1 percent at this stage in 2008).

Even though he is just a freshman in Congress, Erik Paulsen comes in at a close third with $766,468 in PAC money raised through September - up more than $200,000 from this point in his 2008 campaign, or 36.0 percent.

But perhaps the most interesting tale is the one told by Michele Bachmann's fundraising numbers.

Through September 2008, Bachmann had raised $839,978 from special interests, or just $4,500 less than the second most of the eight-member Gopher State delegation.

In the current cycle, PACs have only given $410,062 to Bachmann - down a whopping 51.2 percent - continuing a trend observed by Smart Politics a year ago.

Bachmann now rates just sixth in the delegation in PAC money raised in 2009-2010, ahead of only Betty McCollum ($326,182) and Keith Ellison ($268,841).

But Bachmann - who will eclipse $12 million this cycle before all is said and done - is hardly hurting from this huge dip in PAC support.

While PAC contributions constituted 35.6 percent of her funds at this stage of the campaign in 2008, only 4.3 percent of her fundraising this cycle comes from special interests.

Bachmann's DFL opponent, Tarryl Clark, relies almost twice as much on PAC funds, with her $314,608 in special interest money tallying 8.1 percent of her funds to date.

No other congressional challenger in the Gopher State has raised even $100,000 from PACs yet this cycle, with Randy Demmer the closest at $80,250 (13.2 percent).

Change in Percentage of Funds Raised from PACs During 2008 and 2010 Election Cycles by Minnesota U.S. Representatives

Candidate
District
% 2008
% 2010
Peterson
MN-07
73.1
78.6
Oberstar
MN-08
55.6
52.0
McCollum
MN-04
51.6
47.7
Kline
MN-02
50.7
43.0
Walz
MN-01
36.2
35.4
Paulsen
MN-03
25.2
32.0
Ellison
MN-05
21.7
22.9
Bachmann
MN-06
35.6
4.3
Note: Through September 30th of the 2008 and 2010 election cycles. FEC data compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Emmer Defeat During GOP Wave Would End Nearly 100-Year Trend in Minnesota Gubernatorial Elections
Next post: Harry Reid Could Become Just Fifth Senate Party Floor Leader to Lose at the Ballot Box

2 Comments


  • What about the outside money? We are seeing more special interests running their own ads as a way to exert influence, instead of giving directly to candidates. That could be one explanation on why PAC money is down.

    In Bachmann's case, she became less dependent on PAC money when she became more successful at raising more money from small individual donors. That makes the case for a fair elections system.

  • Oh my god! These politicians are playing with their money. If they really want the betterment of our society they must spent these money for us (common people) not for their campaign.

    When the country is suffering from economical problems these politicians are wasting their money for nothing. They only want the power. They are not for the people and not for the society.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting