Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


PAC Dogs: Oberstar and Peterson Receive More than Half Their Money from Special Interests

Bookmark and Share

PAC contributions to Paulsen up 36 percent from 2008 cycle; contributions to Bachmann down 51.2 percent

While national and statewide media interest in Minnesota congressional fundraising has spiked during the last few weeks, what with the jaw-dropping contributions reeled in by Michele Bachmann and the eye-opening lack of funds raised in-district by Jim Oberstar, there are other fundraising trends bubbling beneath the surface.

Smart Politics finds special interest PAC money to Minnesota's eight congressional incumbents is down more than a half a million dollars this election cycle, or 10.4 percent, compared to the first seven quarters of the 2007-2008 campaign.

Still, Minnesota's two most influential members of Congress, Committee Chairmen Jim Oberstar and Collin Peterson, are collecting more than half of their fundraising through special interest money.

PAC Money Received in 2008 and 2010 Election Cycles by Minnesota U.S. Representatives

Candidate
District
2007-2008
2009-2010
% Change
Oberstar
MN-08
$1,018,589
$843,690
-17.2
Peterson
MN-07
$777,566
$833,000
+7.1
Paulsen
MN-03
$563,539
$766,468
+36.0
Kline
MN-02
$529,665
$587,610
+10.9
Walz
MN-01
$844,496
$627,071
-25.7
Bachmann
MN-06
$839,978
$410,062
-51.2
McCollum
MN-04
$334,680
$326,182
-2.5
Ellison
MN-05
$296,619
$268,841
-9.4
Average
 
$5,205,132
$4,662,924
-10.4
Note: Through September 30th of the 2008 and 2010 election cycles. FEC data compiled by Smart Politics.

Oberstar, who heads the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, leads the way with $843,690 in PAC receipts through the end of September.

While that is tops in the delegation, it is down 17.2 percent from this stage of the 2008 cycle, when the 18-term DFLer had notched over $1 million in PAC funds.

In each of the last two election cycles, PAC money was the largest source of Oberstar's campaign funds - 55.6 percent in 2008 and 52.0 percent in 2010.

Peterson, Chair of the Agriculture Committee, is next with $833,000 - up 7.1 percent from this stage of his 2008 campaign and just $10K shy of catching his colleague from the 8th CD.

Peterson by far raises the largest percentage of his campaign funds from special interests, with 78.6 percent of his 2010 fundraising coming from PACs (up from 73.1 percent at this stage in 2008).

Even though he is just a freshman in Congress, Erik Paulsen comes in at a close third with $766,468 in PAC money raised through September - up more than $200,000 from this point in his 2008 campaign, or 36.0 percent.

But perhaps the most interesting tale is the one told by Michele Bachmann's fundraising numbers.

Through September 2008, Bachmann had raised $839,978 from special interests, or just $4,500 less than the second most of the eight-member Gopher State delegation.

In the current cycle, PACs have only given $410,062 to Bachmann - down a whopping 51.2 percent - continuing a trend observed by Smart Politics a year ago.

Bachmann now rates just sixth in the delegation in PAC money raised in 2009-2010, ahead of only Betty McCollum ($326,182) and Keith Ellison ($268,841).

But Bachmann - who will eclipse $12 million this cycle before all is said and done - is hardly hurting from this huge dip in PAC support.

While PAC contributions constituted 35.6 percent of her funds at this stage of the campaign in 2008, only 4.3 percent of her fundraising this cycle comes from special interests.

Bachmann's DFL opponent, Tarryl Clark, relies almost twice as much on PAC funds, with her $314,608 in special interest money tallying 8.1 percent of her funds to date.

No other congressional challenger in the Gopher State has raised even $100,000 from PACs yet this cycle, with Randy Demmer the closest at $80,250 (13.2 percent).

Change in Percentage of Funds Raised from PACs During 2008 and 2010 Election Cycles by Minnesota U.S. Representatives

Candidate
District
% 2008
% 2010
Peterson
MN-07
73.1
78.6
Oberstar
MN-08
55.6
52.0
McCollum
MN-04
51.6
47.7
Kline
MN-02
50.7
43.0
Walz
MN-01
36.2
35.4
Paulsen
MN-03
25.2
32.0
Ellison
MN-05
21.7
22.9
Bachmann
MN-06
35.6
4.3
Note: Through September 30th of the 2008 and 2010 election cycles. FEC data compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Emmer Defeat During GOP Wave Would End Nearly 100-Year Trend in Minnesota Gubernatorial Elections
Next post: Harry Reid Could Become Just Fifth Senate Party Floor Leader to Lose at the Ballot Box

2 Comments


  • What about the outside money? We are seeing more special interests running their own ads as a way to exert influence, instead of giving directly to candidates. That could be one explanation on why PAC money is down.

    In Bachmann's case, she became less dependent on PAC money when she became more successful at raising more money from small individual donors. That makes the case for a fair elections system.

  • Oh my god! These politicians are playing with their money. If they really want the betterment of our society they must spent these money for us (common people) not for their campaign.

    When the country is suffering from economical problems these politicians are wasting their money for nothing. They only want the power. They are not for the people and not for the society.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Strange Bedfellows: A Historical Review of Divided US Senate Delegations

    Over the last century, states have been twice as likely to be represented by a single political party in the U.S. Senate than have a split delegation; only Delaware, Iowa, and Illinois have been divided more than half the time.

    Political Crumbs

    Haugh to Reach New Heights

    The North Carolina U.S. Senate race between Democratic incumbent Kay Hagan and Republican Thom Tillis may go down to the wire next Tuesday, but along the way Libertarian nominee Sean Haugh is poised to set a state record for a non-major party candidate. Haugh, who previously won 1.5 percent of the vote in the Tar Heel State's 2002 race, has polled at or above five percent in 10 of the last 12 polls that included his name. The current high water mark for a third party or independent candidate in a North Carolina U.S. Senate election is just 3.3 percent, recorded by Libertarian Robert Emory back in 1992. Only one other candidate has eclipsed the three percent mark - Libertarian Christopher Cole with 3.1 percent in 2008.


    Gubernatorial Highs and Lows

    Two sitting governors currently hold the record for the highest gubernatorial vote ever received in their respective states by a non-incumbent: Republican Matt Mead of Wyoming (65.7 percent in 2010) and outgoing GOPer Dave Heineman of Nebraska (73.4 percent in 2006). Republican Gary Herbert of Utah had not previously won a gubernatorial contest when he notched a state record 64.1 percent for his first victory in 2010, but was an incumbent at the time after ascending to the position in 2009 after the early departure of Jon Huntsman. Meanwhile, two sitting governors hold the record in their states for the lowest mark ever recorded by a winning gubernatorial candidate (incumbent or otherwise): independent-turned-Democrat Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island (36.1 percent in 2010) and Democrat Terry McAuliffe of Virginia (47.8 percent in 2013).


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting