Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Bachmann Survives Sixth Closest Victory Among 2010 Republican House Incumbents

Bookmark and Share

Fellow controversial Congressman Joe Wilson (SC-02) at #3; Bachmann had the narrowest victory among GOP incumbents in 2008

Although Minnesota's 6th Congressional District race did not provide the drama in 2010 that many on the left had hoped and expected, Michele Bachmann did have to fight for her victory over DFLer Tarryl Clark - at least compared to most of her fellow Republican incumbents in the U.S. House.

A Smart Politics analysis of unofficial U.S. House election returns finds Michele Bachmann won with the sixth narrowest victory margin in the midterm elections among the 154 Republican incumbents who won reelection on November 2nd.

Bachmann's 12.7-point victory was 29.1 points lower than the 41.8-point nation-wide average for victorious Republican incumbents this year.

In 2008, Congresswoman Bachmann had the narrowest victory margin among successful GOP incumbents at 3.0 points, making her one of the prime targets for Democrats across the country.

In 2010, only four Republican incumbents escaped defeat by less than 10 points - compared to 15 in 2008.

Another two GOP incumbents lost their 2010 reelection bids: Charles Djou of HI-01 and Joseph Cao of LA-02.

Dave Reichert of Washington's 8th CD, who is perennially on the hot seat, survived with the narrowest victory margin among Republican incumbents, at 4.1 points.

Reichert had won his first three terms by just 4.8 points in 2004, 3.0 points in 2006, and 5.6 points in 2008, in a district that has a +3 point Democratic tilt.

Also winning by single digits in 2010 were Daniel Lungren (CA-03, by 7.0 points), Joe "You lie!" Wilson (SC-02, by 9.7 points), and Mary Bono Mack (CA-45) by 9.9 points.

Jim Gerlach (PA-06), who represents the most competitive U.S. House district in the nation since 2002, had the 7th narrowest victory for GOP incumbents at 14.0 points.

The fact that two of the most controversial Republican Representatives in the U.S. House - Bachmann and Wilson - managed only relatively narrow victories in 2010 compared to the rest of their caucus is quite telling.

What they had in common were very well-financed opponents.

Tarryl Clark raised more than $3.5 million through September 2010 while Wilson's opponent, Rob Miller, raised over $2.8 million through the third quarter of this year.

Bachmann's district has a +7 point GOP tilt while Wilson's has a +9 point tilt, according to their Partisan Voting Index scores.

Bachmann's congressional district is currently the most populated in the Gopher State and will thus shed the most residents after redistricting (and perhaps reapportionment) before the 2012 election.

Until new district lines are drawn - and Bachmann's 2012 intentions are determined - it is difficult to know whether or not she will once again be one of the Top 10 most vulnerable Republicans in the House for a third straight cycle.

Top 10 Narrowest Victories by Republican U.S. House Incumbents in 2010

District
Incumbent
Terms
2010
WA-08
Dave Reichert
3
4.1
CA-03
Daniel Lungren
8
7.0
SC-02
Joe Wilson
5
9.7
CA-45
Mary Bono Mack
7
9.9
CA-44
Ken Calvert
9
11.6
MN-06
Michele Bachmann
2
12.7
PA-06
Jim Gerlach
4
14.0
PA-15
Charles Dent
3
14.5
CA-02
Wally Herger
12
15.4
OH-12
Pat Tiberi
5
15.8
Note: Margins based on unofficial results as most states have not yet certified their election returns. Table compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Murkowski Wins More Votes Than All Statewide Write-in Candidates in Alaska History Combined
Next post: Media Myth Exposed: Loss of Democratic Governorships Not Key to Obama's 2012 Battleground State Prospects

4 Comments


  • ...but she won anyway -- regardless of how small the margin. She's turning out to be the "Teflon Congresswoman" -- nothing sticks.

  • Unfortunate for minnesota that the glad hander is back in. This just means more gladhanding of corporate patrons and selling human values out for corporate wealth (which only trickles down to things like Bachmann). It's amazing that so many fail to see the inhuman qualities embodied in her "lifestyle." She is the perfect schill for corporate values, which are clearly not human values. Her "christian" faith has clearly made a place for Mammon that is more elevated than God Himself. What a truely worthless quasi-human she is.

  • Hey Michele, how's that new 1.5 million dollar home of yours?? Feeling pretty good aren't you! I wonder how your desperate welfare dependent district is feeling now? Well they voted you in so they have nobody but themselves to blame!

  • Although Ms. Bachmann may have had a close race, it should be pointed out that she did increase her number of votes from the previous off-year election.
    In 2006, Ms. Bachmann received 151,248 votes (while her Democratic opponent received 127,144 and Independence Party candidate received 23,557 votes.)
    In 2010, Ms. Bachmann received 159,479 (while her Democratic opponent received 120,846 and Independence and Independent candidates received 23,188 votes.)
    Ms. Bachmann gained while the Democrat lost votes as the overall vote tally was roughly the same.

    Comparing the other Minnesota districts, incumbents lost votes … and in most cases, so did the challengers.
    For example, in Minnesota’s First District, Tim Walz received 141,556 in 2006 but only 122,365 in 2010 (versus his Republican incumbent opponent Gil Gutknecht who received 126,486 and Randy Demmer’s 109,241 in 2010 (with 16,296 going to other candidates.) Admittedly, the First was a contested contest in both years, but 20,417 fewer votes were cast in 2010.
    Admittedly, the candidates changed in Minnesota’s Third District, but surprisingly the Democrat tally stayed consistent. Republican Jim Ramstad pulled in 184,333 votes in 2006 while Erik Paulsen only received 161,178 in 2010 versus the Democrats who received 99,588 and 100,240 votes respectively (note there were a significant 12,508 votes for the Independence Party candidate in 2010.)

    You might find it interesting to look at the races that you highlighted to see any trend.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting