Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


South Dakota Democratic State Senate Delegation Slashed to 44-Year Low

Bookmark and Share

Democratic delegation to State Senate cut by more than half on Tuesday

Put simply, Election Day was brutal for Democrats in South Dakota.

Not only did their brightest star, Blue Dog Democrat Stephanie Herseth Sandlin, narrowly lose her reelection bid for a fifth term against Republican Kristi Noem, but the Party's already thin representation in the legislature was decimated. (Not to mention the fact Democrats failed to field a U.S. Senate candidate against John Thune for the first time in history).

The losses endured by the Democrats in the South Dakota House of Representatives were expected and not unusual.

Democratic membership of the 70-seat body dropped four seats from 24 to 20 - which has been the average number of seats won by the Party across the last seven election cycles in the House. (Smart Politics projected a loss of three seats).

Over the past 110 years of elections to the House, Democrats have won more seats than Republicans in only two election cycles - 1932 (70 seats to 33) and 1934 (63 to 40).

On one other occasion Democrats equaled the GOP on Election Day, with each party winning 35 seats in the 1972 elections.

As strange as it may sound, the 20 seats won by the Democrats in the House (28.6 percent of the 70-seat chamber) is actually better than their historical average since the turn of the 20th Century.

Over the past 56 general elections dating back to 1900, South Dakota Democrats have won just 23.1 percent of House seats, or 1,056 out of 4,574 races. Republicans have won 76.1 percent (3,483 seats) while third parties or independents have won 0.8 percent (35 seats).

But it is the losses Democrats suffered in the State Senate that particularly stung the Party on Tuesday.

Democrats won only 6 of 35 seats, or 17 percent of the upper chamber: Districts 1, 2, 15, 17, 26, and 27.

That marks a loss of over half its delegation from the previous election cycle, when Democrats held 14 seats.

Smart Politics projected a loss of four seats for the Democrats, which would have left them with just 10 districts, or one more than the 40-year low of 9 seats won during the elections of 1982 and 2002.

But the losses were even worse than that.

Democrats have now reached their lowest level of representation in the Senate since the midterm elections of 1966 - another national wave year for the GOP.

In that cycle, Democrats fell from even greater heights - from the 16 districts won during the Democratic wave of 1964.

The losses by the Democrats in the Senate in 2010 and 2008 - a year in which the party hoped to gain districts (they lost one net seat) - are particularly brutal for a party trying to rebuild, as Democrats have had some success in Senate elections, especially when compared to their comrades in the House.

Democrats won control of the Senate as recently as 1992 (20 seats to 15) and in a half dozen other elections since 1900: in 1932 (29 to 16), 1934 (31 to 14), 1936 (23 to 22), 1958 (20 to 15), 1972 (18 to 17), and 1974 (19 to 16).

Over the past 56 general elections dating back to 1900, Democrats have won just 27.8 percent of Senate seats, or 598 out of 2,150 races. Republicans have won 71.5 percent (1,538 seats) while third parties or independents have won 0.7 percent (14 seats).

However, things could be worse for Senate Democrats in South Dakota.

The party was shut out at the ballot box during the elections of 1944, 1946, and 1952 - losing all 35 races each cycle.

Total State Senate and House Seats Won by Party in South Dakota General Elections, 1900-2010

Party
# Senate seats
% Senate seats
# House seats
% House seats
Republican
1,538
71.5
3,483
76.1
Democrat
598
27.8
1,056
23.1
Third
14
0.7
35
0.8
Total
2,150
100.0
4,574
100.0
Note: The South Dakota Senate was a 45-seat chamber through the Election of 1936 and a 35-seat chamber thereafter. The size of the South Dakota House of Representatives has varied over the years from 87 seats, to 89 seats, to 104 seats, to 103 seats, to 75 seats, to its current size of 70 seats beginning with the Election of 1972. Data culled from South Dakota Legislative Research Council.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Michele Bachmann Raised More Than $70 Per Vote Won on Election Day
Next post: Nancy Pelosi 1 of 8 House Democrats to Win by Bigger Margin in 2010 than 2008

1 Comment


  • Are you going to do an analysis of the difference between the Emmer vote and the vote for Republican legislators that were elected? My guess is there is enough of a drop off to account for a big portion of the Dayton margin? It would be hard to tell how many votes went to Horner but maybe you have thought about a way to do that.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    No Free Passes: States With 2 Major Party Candidates in Every US House Race

    Indiana has now placed candidates from both major parties on the ballot in a nation-best 189 consecutive U.S. House races, with New Hampshire, Minnesota, Idaho, and Montana also north of 100 in a row.

    Political Crumbs

    Gubernatorial Highs and Lows

    Two sitting governors currently hold the record for the highest gubernatorial vote ever received in their respective states by a non-incumbent: Republican Matt Mead of Wyoming (65.7 percent in 2010) and outgoing GOPer Dave Heineman of Nebraska (73.4 percent in 2006). Republican Gary Herbert of Utah had not previously won a gubernatorial contest when he notched a state record 64.1 percent for his first victory in 2010, but was an incumbent at the time after ascending to the position in 2009 after the early departure of Jon Huntsman. Meanwhile, two sitting governors hold the record in their states for the lowest mark ever recorded by a winning gubernatorial candidate (incumbent or otherwise): independent-turned-Democrat Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island (36.1 percent in 2010) and Democrat Terry McAuliffe of Virginia (47.8 percent in 2013).


    An Idaho Six Pack

    Two-term Idaho Republican Governor Butch Otter only polled at 39 percent in a recent PPP survey of the state's 2014 race - just four points ahead of Democratic businessman A.J. Balukoff. Otter's low numbers reflect his own struggles as a candidate (witness his weak primary win against State Senator Russ Fulcher) combined with the opportunity for disgruntled Idahoans to cast their votes for one of four third party and independent candidates, who collectively received the support of 12 percent of likely voters: Libertarian John Bujak, the Constitution Party's Steve Pankey, and independents Jill Humble and Pro-Life (aka Marvin Richardson). The six candidate options in a gubernatorial race sets an all-time record in the Gem State across the 46 elections conducted since statehood. The previous high water mark of five candidates was reached in seven previous cycles: 1902, 1904, 1908, 1912, 1914, 1966, and 2010.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting