Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


South Dakota Democratic State Senate Delegation Slashed to 44-Year Low

Bookmark and Share

Democratic delegation to State Senate cut by more than half on Tuesday

Put simply, Election Day was brutal for Democrats in South Dakota.

Not only did their brightest star, Blue Dog Democrat Stephanie Herseth Sandlin, narrowly lose her reelection bid for a fifth term against Republican Kristi Noem, but the Party's already thin representation in the legislature was decimated. (Not to mention the fact Democrats failed to field a U.S. Senate candidate against John Thune for the first time in history).

The losses endured by the Democrats in the South Dakota House of Representatives were expected and not unusual.

Democratic membership of the 70-seat body dropped four seats from 24 to 20 - which has been the average number of seats won by the Party across the last seven election cycles in the House. (Smart Politics projected a loss of three seats).

Over the past 110 years of elections to the House, Democrats have won more seats than Republicans in only two election cycles - 1932 (70 seats to 33) and 1934 (63 to 40).

On one other occasion Democrats equaled the GOP on Election Day, with each party winning 35 seats in the 1972 elections.

As strange as it may sound, the 20 seats won by the Democrats in the House (28.6 percent of the 70-seat chamber) is actually better than their historical average since the turn of the 20th Century.

Over the past 56 general elections dating back to 1900, South Dakota Democrats have won just 23.1 percent of House seats, or 1,056 out of 4,574 races. Republicans have won 76.1 percent (3,483 seats) while third parties or independents have won 0.8 percent (35 seats).

But it is the losses Democrats suffered in the State Senate that particularly stung the Party on Tuesday.

Democrats won only 6 of 35 seats, or 17 percent of the upper chamber: Districts 1, 2, 15, 17, 26, and 27.

That marks a loss of over half its delegation from the previous election cycle, when Democrats held 14 seats.

Smart Politics projected a loss of four seats for the Democrats, which would have left them with just 10 districts, or one more than the 40-year low of 9 seats won during the elections of 1982 and 2002.

But the losses were even worse than that.

Democrats have now reached their lowest level of representation in the Senate since the midterm elections of 1966 - another national wave year for the GOP.

In that cycle, Democrats fell from even greater heights - from the 16 districts won during the Democratic wave of 1964.

The losses by the Democrats in the Senate in 2010 and 2008 - a year in which the party hoped to gain districts (they lost one net seat) - are particularly brutal for a party trying to rebuild, as Democrats have had some success in Senate elections, especially when compared to their comrades in the House.

Democrats won control of the Senate as recently as 1992 (20 seats to 15) and in a half dozen other elections since 1900: in 1932 (29 to 16), 1934 (31 to 14), 1936 (23 to 22), 1958 (20 to 15), 1972 (18 to 17), and 1974 (19 to 16).

Over the past 56 general elections dating back to 1900, Democrats have won just 27.8 percent of Senate seats, or 598 out of 2,150 races. Republicans have won 71.5 percent (1,538 seats) while third parties or independents have won 0.7 percent (14 seats).

However, things could be worse for Senate Democrats in South Dakota.

The party was shut out at the ballot box during the elections of 1944, 1946, and 1952 - losing all 35 races each cycle.

Total State Senate and House Seats Won by Party in South Dakota General Elections, 1900-2010

Party
# Senate seats
% Senate seats
# House seats
% House seats
Republican
1,538
71.5
3,483
76.1
Democrat
598
27.8
1,056
23.1
Third
14
0.7
35
0.8
Total
2,150
100.0
4,574
100.0
Note: The South Dakota Senate was a 45-seat chamber through the Election of 1936 and a 35-seat chamber thereafter. The size of the South Dakota House of Representatives has varied over the years from 87 seats, to 89 seats, to 104 seats, to 103 seats, to 75 seats, to its current size of 70 seats beginning with the Election of 1972. Data culled from South Dakota Legislative Research Council.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Michele Bachmann Raised More Than $70 Per Vote Won on Election Day
Next post: Nancy Pelosi 1 of 8 House Democrats to Win by Bigger Margin in 2010 than 2008

1 Comment


  • Are you going to do an analysis of the difference between the Emmer vote and the vote for Republican legislators that were elected? My guess is there is enough of a drop off to account for a big portion of the Dayton margin? It would be hard to tell how many votes went to Horner but maybe you have thought about a way to do that.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting