Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Bachmann's Potential Presidential Pathway Not Well-Trodden

Bookmark and Share

Only one sitting member of the U.S. House has been elected president in history (Garfield); only three presidents have been elected with U.S. Representative as the highest elected office attained on their resume

In a day that was meant to be John Boehner's - elected Speaker of the House for the 112th Congress Wednesday afternoon - word of Michele Bachmann's potential 2012 presidential aspirations detracted a bit from the Boehner fanfare on the GOP side of the aisle.

Congresswoman Bachmann's feeler has, of course, created buzz around the country as well as critiques from the left, many of whom believe she has no chance to win because of her conservative political ideology.

But if Bachmann does officially put her hat in the ring in the coming months, she would not only become a rare female presidential candidate from a major political party, but also a Representative attempting to achieve something that has not been accomplished in more than 130 years.

A Smart Politics analysis finds the last time a career politician won the presidency with U.S. Representative as the highest level of elected office attained on their resume was 1880, when Republican James Garfield became the 20th President of the United States.

Garfield is one of just three presidents in history, along with James Madison and Abraham Lincoln, who took their pathway to the presidency through the U.S. House as their highest political stepping-stone of elected office.

More importantly, Garfield is the only president in history who launched a successful presidential campaign while serving in the House of Representatives.

(Garfield was also elected to the U.S. Senate earlier in 1880, but never served in the upper chamber having won the presidency that November).

Unlike Bachmann, however, Garfield had nearly two full decades of service in the U.S. House (1863-1881), and had held several key committee assignments, such as Chairs of the Appropriations, Banking and Currency, and Military Affairs Committees.

James Madison, the nation's 4th President, served in the House of Representatives from the Commonwealth of Virginia for eight years (1789-1797) prior to being appointed Secretary of State by Thomas Jefferson in 1801.

Madison served as Secretary of State for both of Jefferson's terms before winning the presidential elections of 1808 and 1812.

The only other president whose political history suggests Bachmann's potential US House-to-the-White-House strategy is possible is Abraham Lincoln, the nation's 16th President.

Lincoln served for one term as a Whig in the U.S. House from Illinois, from 1847-1849, although that was more than a decade before his successful presidential run.

This is not to suggest that those who have served in the U.S. House are unlikely to become president. In fact, more than one-third (13) of the 38 different elected presidents in history served in the U.S. House at some point prior to their presidential win:

· James Madison, from Virginia's 5th and 15th CDs (1789-1797)
· Andrew Jackson, from Tennessee's at-large seat (1796-1797)
· William Henry Harrison, from Ohio's 1st CD (1816-1819)
· James Polk, from Tennessee's 6th and 9th CDs (1825-1839)
· Franklin Pierce, from New Hampshire's at-large seat (1833-1837)
· James Buchanan, from Pennsylvania's 3rd and 4th CDs (1821-1831)
· Abraham Lincoln, from Illinois' 7th CD (1847-1849)
· James Garfield, from Ohio's 19th CD (1863-1881)
· William McKinley, from Ohio's 16th, 17, 18th, and 20th CDs (1877-1884, 1885-1891)
· John Kennedy, from Massachusetts' 11th CD (1947-1953)
· Lyndon Johnson, from Texas' 10th CD (1937-1949)
· Richard Nixon, from California's 12th CD (1947-1950)
· George H.W. Bush, from Texas' 7th CD (1967-1971)

Of course, there have been a handful of presidents - some military heroes - who never served in any elected office before winning the presidency: Dwight Eisenhower (General of the U.S. Army), Herbert Hoover (U.S. Secretary of Commerce), William Howard Taft (appointed U.S. Solicitor General, U.S. Court of Appeals Judge, Governor of the Philippines, Secretary of War), Ulysses Grant (Commanding General of the U.S. Army), and Zachary Taylor (Major General of the U.S. Army).

One of the obvious reasons U.S. House members have historically had difficulty making a successful leap directly to the White House is due to their lack of national name recognition (and thus the inability to raise money).

This is one problem Representative Bachmann would not have to face.

Congresswoman Bachmann is one of the most well known Republicans on Capitol Hill, raised more money than any other member of the U.S. House by far during the last campaign cycle, and is the founder and unofficial leader of the House Tea Party Caucus.

Regarding her experience to become Commander in Chief - if she decides to make a presidential run - Bachmann would have notched as many years of state and federal legislative experience as Barack Obama had amassed when he announced his candidacy in February 2007.

Bachmann has served for six years in the Minnesota Senate and four years in the U.S. House, while Obama served eight years in the Illinois Senate and two years in the U.S. Senate.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: What's in a Name? From Abraham to Zell, 100 Years of U.S. Senators
Next post: Wisconsin's Population Rank Over the Last 100 Years

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting