Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


2012 U.S. Senate Incumbent Cash on Hand Rankings

Bookmark and Share

Most "safe" incumbents lagging behind the pack in cash on hand through 2010

As day breaks on Thursday, some D.C. officeholders are making one final push on the last day of fundraising for the first quarter of 2011.

And while new quarterly numbers won't be available for a few weeks, here is how the nation's 25 U.S. Senators running for reelection in 2012 stack up relative to one another in terms of cash on hand through the 4th Quarter of 2010:

Cash on Hand for 2012 U.S. Senate Incumbents Through 2010

Rank
State
Senator
Party
Cash on Hand
1
MA
Scott Brown
GOP
$7,176,245
2
CA
Dianne Feinstein
Democrat
$3,853,697
3
FL
Bill Nelson
Democrat
$3,083,493
4
UT
Orrin Hatch
GOP
$2,509,182
5
NJ
Bob Menendez
Democrat
$2,426,682
6
IN
Richard Lugar
GOP
$2,351,185
7
MI
Debbie Stabenow
Democrat
$2,033,077
8
MN
Amy Klobuchar
Democrat
$1,613,680
9
OH
Sherrod Brown
Democrat
$1,520,209
10
NE
Ben Nelson
Democrat
$1,450,037
11
PA
Bob Casey
Democrat
$1,315,935
12
ME
Olympia Snowe
GOP
$1,234,629
13
TN
Bob Corker
GOP
$1,135,539
14
WI
Herb Kohl*
Democrat
$1,004,348
15
MO
Claire McCaskill
Democrat
$905,018
16
DE
Tom Carper
Democrat
$799,054
17
RI
Sheldon Whitehouse
Democrat
$722,999
18
NY
Kirsten Gillibrand
Democrat
$614,593
19
WY
John Barrasso
GOP
$601,811
20
MT
Jon Tester
Democrat
$561,822
21
VT
Bernie Sanders
Independent
$535,594
22
WA
Maria Cantwell
Democrat
$499,264
23
MS
Roger Wicker
GOP
$402,771
24
MD
Ben Cardin
Democrat
$385,385
25
WV
Joe Manchin
Democrat
$377,306
* Herb Kohl has not yet officially announced his 2012 plans. Source: Table compiled from FEC data.

It remains to be seen how these numbers will change by next month, but it is interesting to note that almost all of the incumbents deemed "safe" by the leading D.C. prognosticators rank in the bottom half of cash on hand.

Larry Sabato, Charlie Cook, and Stu Rothenberg each agree that Ben Cardin (#24), Roger Wicker (#23), Bernie Sanders (#21), John Barrasso (#19), Kirsten Gillibrand (#18), Sheldon Whitehouse (#17), Tom Carper (#16), and Bob Corker (#13) are all 'safe' in 2012.

The only two Senators unanimously considered safe at the top of the list by these three political observers are California's Dianne Feinstein (#2) and Utah's Orrin Hatch (#4).

Feinstein, of course, represents the most populous state in the nation, so even a relatively safe candidate in the Golden State needs to raise more money than most senators to reach the millions more voters that populate California.

(However, last week Smart Politics challenged the notion that Feinstein is invincible as she seeks a fifth term next year).

Candidates will begin to roll out their new fundraising totals in about a week, with FEC data published in the middle of April.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Barrett vs. Walker II: A History of Wisconsin Gubernatorial Rematch Elections

Losing gubernatorial candidates have come back for rematches against victorious Republicans and beat them two times out of the six rematches in Wisconsin history.

Political Crumbs

Governor vs. Governor vs. Governor

The last election cycle saw five ex-governors attempt to win back their old jobs, with success stories in California (Jerry Brown), Iowa (Terry Branstad), and Oregon (John Kitzhaber). But in 1904, the State of Wisconsin saw three governors on the general election ballot: two-term Republican incumbent Robert La Follette, former two-term Democratic Governor William Peck (elected in 1890 and 1892), and former two-term Republican Governor Edward Scofield (elected in 1896 and 1898). La Follette - with Teddy Roosevelt at the top of the ticket winning the presidency - cruised to an 11.3-point victory over Peck with 50.5 percent of the vote. Scofield ran a distant fourth on the National Republican ticket with just 2.7 percent - also losing to Social Democrat William Arnold who received 5.5 percent, but beating Prohibition and Socialist Labor candidates.


A Vote for No One

More than 50,000 North Carolina residents who voted in the Tuesday's Republican presidential primary opted for 'no preference' on their ballot, or 5.2 percent. That marks the second highest percentage of those who have done so in the 40 years of the modern primary era, behind the 9.8 percent who indicated no preference during George H.W. Bush's rout over Pat Buchanan in the state twenty years ago in 1992. In 2008, 4.0 percent were likewise noncommittal, with 1.7 percent voting no preference in 2000, 3.8 percent in 1996, 1.0 percent in 1988, 2.7 percent in 1980, and 1.7 percent in 1976.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting