Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


King vs. Latham Matchup Would Be 1 in 100 Event in Iowa GOP Politics

Bookmark and Share

Only 1 pair of 101 Republican U.S. Representatives serving in a redistricting cycle has squared off in a renomination battle in Iowa history; it has never happened on the Democratic side

The first redistricting map produced by Iowa's Legislative Services Agency (LSA) on Thursday sets into motion the likelihood of some truly historical developments in Iowa congressional politics.

The non-partisan agency's map - collapsing the state's five districts into four due to reapportionment - would potentially pit two pairs of same-party incumbents against one another in 2012 primary races: Republicans Tom Latham and Steve King (in the proposed 4th CD) and Democrats Dave Loebsack and Bruce Braley (in the new 1st CD).

While the Iowa legislature and governor would need to approve this plan for it to take effect, even if it is rejected it does not mean the next map won't also house intra-party incumbents in the same districts. (Among other variables, the LSA is not allowed to consider the place of residence of U.S. Representatives).

Which brings us to the very real possibility that Iowans may witness a Latham vs. King and/or Loebsack vs. Braley matchup in the Hawkeye State's primary - slated to be held in early June 2012.

And how rare of an event would this be in Iowa politics?

A Smart Politics study finds that only one pair out of 101 Iowa Republican U.S. Representatives in office during redistricting years has squared off in a renomination battle since statehood.

On the Democratic side, none of the 19 incumbents that have been in office in redistricting years have ever faced a fellow U.S. Representative from their own party in a nomination battle.

Since the formation of the Republican Party in the mid-1850s, there have been 101 Republican U.S. House members from Iowa who were in office at the time new district lines went into effect (every 10 years from 1862 through 2002).

King and Latham will be numbers 102 and 103 should they both run in 2012.

A total of 88 of these GOP Representatives ran for reelection, while 13 opted to retire from their seat.

Of the 88 that ran, 76 were reelected to Congress, 10 lost in the general election, and two did not receive their party's nomination.

Only one of these two who lost their renomination bid did so against another Republican incumbent - C. William Ramseyer.

Ramseyer was a nine-term incumbent from Iowa's 6th CD heading into the 1932 cycle when the Hawkeye State lost two of its 11 seats.

The state's new nine congressional district map found Ramseyer paired up with another Republican incumbent (the state had elected 10 of 11 GOPers in 1930) - four-term Congressman Lloyd Thurston from the 8th CD.

Ramseyer and Thurston both vied for the Republican nomination in the newly-drawn 5th CD with Thurston ultimately receiving the nomination and narrowly winning the general election by 633 votes over Democratic challenger Lloyd Ellis.

If King and Latham are eventually paired up in the same congressional district in 2012 - and both seek reelection - it will mark only the second time this has occurred in 150+ years of Iowa Republican politics.

This does not mean, however, that other Republican pairs have not occasionally seen their districts merge in the past - simply that on only one occasion did neither U.S. Representative bow out (in 1932).

For example, in 1882, three-term Republican Nathaniel Deering from the 4th CD saw his district redrawn to include 3rd CD GOP Representative Thomas Updegraff.

According to the 1883 Congressional Directory, Deering ultimately declined to seek renomination, though Updegraff went on to lose to Democratic-Greenback nominee Luman Weller in the general election.

The only other time a sitting Republican incumbent lost his party's nomination in a redistricting year was in 1872 when one-term Congressman Madison Walden was challenged by former Republican U.S. Representative William Loughridge.

In 1870, Walden had snatched the nomination away from Loughridge in the 4th CD, but Loughridge got his revenge in 1872 in the newly-drawn 6th CD. (Loughridge also won the general election race later that year).

Half of the 10 remaining Republican U.S. Representatives from Iowa who lost their reelection bids during redistricting cycles did so during the Democratic landslide of 1932: Thomas Updegraff (1882), Sewell Farwell (1882), Charles Pickett (1912), Ed Campbell (1932), Charles Swanson (1932), Gilbert Haugen (1932), Thomas Robinson (1932), William Kopp (1932), John Kyl (1972), and Fred Schwengel (1972).

Iowa Republican U.S. Representatives Who Did Not Return to Congress in Redistricting Cycles Since Statehood

Year
Representative
Terms
Reason
2002
Greg Ganske
4
Did not run
1972
Fred Schwengel
8
Lost general election
1972
John Kyl
6
Lost general election
1932
William Kopp
6
Lost general election
1932
Thomas Robinson
5
Lost general election
1932
Gilbert Haugen
17
Lost general election
1932
Cenerus Cole
6
Did not run
1932
C. William Ramseyer
9
Lost nomination***
1932
Charles Swanson
2
Lost general election
1932
Ed Campbell
2
Lost general election
1922
Burton Sweet
4
Did not run
1912
Charles Pickett
2
Lost general election
1912
Nathan Kendall
2
Did not run
1902
John Rumple
1
Did not run
1902
David Henderson
10
Did not run
1892
James Flick
2
Did not run
1892
Thomas Bowman
1
Did not run
1882
Sewell Farwell
1
Lost general election
1882
Thomas Updegraff
2*
Lost general election
1882
Nathaniel Deering
3
Did not run
1882
William Thompson
2
Did not run
1882
Cyrus Carpenter
2
Did not run
1872
Madison Walden
1
Lost nomination**
1872
Francis Palmer
2
Did not run
1862
William Vandever
2*
Did not run
* Vandever would later serve two terms as a congressman from California. Updegraff would go on to serve three additional terms from Iowa in the 1890s. ** Walden lost the GOP nomination to former Representative William Loughridge. *** Ramseyer lost the GOP nomination to Representative Lloyd Thurston. Table compiled by Smart Politics.

Throughout Iowa's political history, Republicans have dominated congressional elections - winning 81 percent of the more than 650 general and special election contests that have been held since statehood.

Democrats have won just 18 percent with 1 percent going to third parties.

As a result, on the Democratic side, only 19 U.S. Representatives have been in office during redistricting cycles in the history of the Hawkeye State.

Of these 19 representatives, 18 ran for reelection while just one did not (three-term Congressman Merwin Coad in 1962).

Of these 18 Democrats, only 11 were successful in winning reelection, with seven losing their general election race: Lincoln Clark (1852), Frederick White (1892), John Hamilton (1892), Walter Butler (1892), John Seerley (1892), William Jacobsen (1942), and David Nagle (1992).

If David Loebsack and Bruce Braley ultimately face off in a Democratic primary in 2012, it will therefore be the first time in Iowa Democratic Party history that two sitting Democratic U.S. Representatives vie for the same seat.

And thus while Republicans in the Iowa legislature may not be thrilled to sign off on a redistricting plan that pits King against Latham, they can at least be assured under this first plan the Democratic Party will at least lose one incumbent come January 2013.

Reelection Fate of Democratic and Republican Iowa U.S. Representatives in Redistricting Years Since Statehood

Incumbents
Republican
Democrat
Total
Won reelection
76
11
87
Lost general election
10
7
17
Lost nomination
2
0
2
Did not run
13
1
14
Total
101
19
120
Note: There were two vacancies heading into redistricting year general elections: In 1912 in the 11th CD after the death of Republican Elbert Hubbard, and in 1942 in the 9th CD after the resignation of Democrat Vincent F. Harrington. One other congressman, Whig Daniel Miller, did not seek reelection in 1852. Table compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: 2012 U.S. Senate Incumbent Cash on Hand Rankings
Next post: History Says Wisconsin's Freshmen GOP U.S. House Members Will be Safe in 2012

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting