Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Kloppenburg Vote Tally Largest in WI History for Contested Supreme Court Race

Bookmark and Share

Both candidates break old state record by nearly 77,000 votes; Kloppenburg total still eclipsed by four others in uncontested elections

[Update (7:30 pm): While vote totals fluctuate throughout the coming days (with incumbent Prosser now in the lead at the end of Thursday), the end result remains that the winner of this race will end up with the largest vote total in a contested race in state history].

Despite a record number of voters casting their ballots in Wisconsin's Supreme Court election on Tuesday, the closeness of the race will keep whichever candidate emerges the victor from the (likely) recount far shy of netting the highest vote tally in state history for this office.

Although history will still have been made.

A Smart Politics review of Wisconsin electoral records finds that the vote for Assistant Attorney General JoAnne Kloppenburg ranks fifth all time for raw ballots received, although first for a contested race.

(Note: This report examines only raw votes and does not adjust for the changes in voting-age population over the decades).

Kloppenburg had an unofficial total of 740,090 heading into Wednesday evening with incumbent David Prosser at 739,886.

The candidate who can claim the most votes ever received for a state Supreme Court election is Leo Hanley, who notched 884,421 votes in April of 1968.

Wisconsin had approximately 1.3 million fewer total residents at that time.

Hanley, however, won his seat uncontested in what was also a presidential election year.

Democratic voters in the Badger State were backing Eugene McCarthy, with (recently withdrawn) Lyndon Johnson, Robert Kennedy, Hubert Humphrey, and George Wallace all appearing on the presidential preference ballot.

Over 733,000 Wisconin residents voted in the Democratic primary that April.

Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, and Harold Stassen were candidates on the Republican side, with Nelson Rockefeller and George Romney also both receiving thousands of write-in votes. Nearly 490,000 Wisconsinites voted in the GOP race.

After Hanley, the next three largest vote tallies ever received by Supreme Court candidates in Wisconsin also came in unchallenged races:

· William Grant Callow in 1987 with 836,637 votes.
· William Bablitch in 1993 with 779,284 votes.
· George Currie in 1957 with 757,065 votes.

With a cumulative vote tally in the Supreme Court race flirting with 1.5 million, Tuesday's election set an all time Wisconsin record for the raw number of votes in a Supreme Court contest.

Previous bests all took place during presidential election years: 1.32 million in 1980 (won by Donald Steinmetz), 1.16 million in 1976 (Roland Day), and 1.04 million in 1964 (Horace Wilkie).

Prior to Tuesday, the single largest number of votes recorded by a single candidate in a contested Supreme Court election was 663,378 - turned in by Steinmetz in 1980. Runner-up Louis Ceci won 658,605 votes in that race.

Kloppenburg - and Prosser - each bested that mark by nearly 77,000 votes.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Which States Have the Most Split-Ticket Voting in Presidential-U.S. Senate Election Cycles?
Next post: Fortune Cookie Politics: Bachmann Delivers Budget Message to Obama from the Chinese

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting