Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Which States Have the Most Split-Ticket Voting in Presidential-U.S. Senate Election Cycles?

Bookmark and Share

MT is the only state in the nation to split its presidential-U.S. Senate ticket in a majority of elections with ND and RI close behind; KS, WY, NC, and UT have the strongest straight-ticket record

With several Democratic U.S. Senators on the ballot in battleground or red-leaning states in 2012 (e.g. Missouri, Montana, West Virginia), some analysts expect President Barack Obama may be a drag at the top of the ticket in these key senatorial reelection battles.

However, although a strong top of the ticket is always preferred for a senatorial incumbent, voters in several states have demonstrated a long history of splitting their ticket in the top two races for federal office.

A Smart Politics study of the more than 800 U.S. Senate contests conducted during presidential election cycles over the last 100 years finds that three states have split their ballot for these two offices at least half of the time: Montana, North Dakota, and Rhode Island.

Overall, voters have split their ballots in presidential and U.S. Senate races less than 30 percent of the time since popular vote senatorial races were introduced about a century ago, doing so in just 245 out of 829 elections (29.6 percent).

Montana leads the nation in schizophrenic balloting, splitting its presidential-U.S. Senate ballot in nine out of 17 elections, or 53 percent of the time.

The Big Sky State will host one of the premiere U.S. Senate races in the nation next year, with one-term Democratic incumbent Jon Tester likely squaring off against at-large GOP U.S. Representative Denny Rehberg.

Obama lost Montana in 2008 by 2.4 points, and Tester might be seen as particularly vulnerable unless the president substantially improves his position in the coming year and a half.

However, Montana has a rich tradition of electing Democratic Senators while voting for a Republican in the race for the White House, doing so nine times: in 1924, 1928, 1952, 1960, 1972, 1976, 1984, 1996, and 2008.

The 53 percent rate at which Montanans have sent Democrats to the Senate when the GOP presidential nominee carried the state is nearly three times the national average of just 18.3 percent.

(Montana has never voted for a Democratic presidential nominee while electing a Republican U.S. Senator).

The other two states that have split their vote in presidential and U.S. Senate races at least half the time are North Dakota and Rhode Island - both of which also host Senate races in 2012.

Each state has split their top of the ballot for these federal offices eight times across 16 election cycles.

North Dakota would likely have padded that number in 2012 had Democrat Kent Conrad decided to seek a sixth term instead of opting to retire.

At this time the Democratic slot appears to be wide open, with former U.S. Representative Earl Pomeroy considered by some to be the party's best chance to hold the seat should he enter the race.

Another nine states have split their presidential and senatorial ticket at least 40 percent of the time - including five states holding U.S. Senate races in 2012: Minnesota (tied for #5, 44.4 percent), Delaware and Pennsylvania (tied for #7, 43.8 percent), and Massachusetts and Missouri (#11, 41.2 percent).

Despite Pennsylvania's high ranking on this list, one-term Democrat Bob Casey will be crossing his fingers for an Obama victory in the Keystone State.

Of the seven times Pennsylvanians have split their ticket in these contests, only once did they do so with a Republican presidential nominee and a Democratic Senator: in 1956, when the state elected Joseph Clark by less than 18,000 votes while helping to elect Dwight Eisenhower to a second term.

In another high-profile 2012 contest, Democrat Claire McCaskill can be heartened by the fact that Missouri has voted for a Republican presidential nominee and elected a Democratic Senator on four occasions: (in 1952, 1968, 1980, and 2000).

Missouri narrowly voted for John McCain over Obama in 2008.

Rounding out the Top 10 for split ticket voting are Oregon (#4, 47.4 percent), Louisiana (tied for #5, 44.4 percent), and Arkansas and New Hampshire (#7, 43.8 percent).

Current Trends

Looking at the data with a shorter historical lens reveals only five states currently have a streak of more than one consecutive election in which its presidential-U.S. Senate ballot has been split.

Maine (1988, 1996, 2000, 2008) and North Dakota (1988, 1992, 2000, 2004) lead the way with four consecutive cycles, followed by Pennsylvania (1992, 2000, 2004) and Arkansas (1996, 2004, 2008) with three and West Virginia (2000, 2008) with two.

Maine will likely extend that streak to five in 2012 with popular GOP incumbent Olympia Snowe heavily favored in a state likely to be carried by Obama.

Another six states split their presidential-U.S. Senate ballot the last time the two offices aligned in the same election cycle: Alaska, Indiana, Louisiana, Montana, Nevada, and South Dakota.

Straight-Ticket States

And what states have been least likely to deviate from a straight-ticket vote in presidential and U.S. Senate races?

Four states have done so on only one occasion during the last century: Kansas (#50, 5.6 percent), Wyoming (#49, 5.9 percent), Utah (#47, 6.3 percent), and North Carolina (#47, 6.3 percent).

Kansas has voted Republican for both offices 15 times, Democratic for both offices two times, and split the vote for a Democratic presidential nominee and a GOP Senator once (in 1936).

Wyoming and Utah split their ticket in 1928 with North Carolina doing it in 1968.

Other states populating the Bottom 10 include Indiana (#46, 11. percent), Wisconsin (#45, 12.5 percent), Illinois (#44, 16.7 percent), Vermont (#43, 17.6 percent), and Connecticut, Michigan, and Texas (#40, 18.8 percent).

Michigan, Connecticut, and Wisconsin (if Herb Kohl retires) will have U.S. Senate races to keep an eye on in 2012.

And then there are these interesting historical facts:

· Alaska is the only state that has never voted for a Democratic presidential nominee while electing a Democratic Senator in the same cycle. Five states have done so just one time: Maine, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, and South Dakota.

Florida has elected Democrats to both offices the most times with 10 followed by Arkansas, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, New Mexico, North Carolina, and West Virginia with nine.

· Two states have never voted for a Republican presidential nominee while electing a GOP Senator in the same cycle: Arkansas and Hawaii. Rhode Island and Louisiana have done so just one time.

Kansas and Indiana voters have backed both Republican presidential and U.S. Senate candidates on the most occasions with 15 and 14 respectively.

· Seventeen states have never voted for a Democratic presidential nominee while electing a Republican to the U.S. Senate: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Connecticut, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, Utah, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

Oregon and Pennsylvania have done so the most times with six, followed by Massachusetts and New Hampshire with five.

· Kansas is the only state in the nation that has never voted for a Republican presidential nominee while electing a Democratic U.S. Senator. Another 10 states have done so in just one election: Hawaii, Maryland, Minnesota, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Utah, Vermont, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

As reported above, Montana has split its ballot in this fashion a nation-leading nine times, with Nevada and North Dakota next at six.

Largest Percentage of Split Ticket Voting in Presidential and U.S. Senate Elections by State

Rank
State
Split
Total
% Split
1
Montana*
9
17
52.9
2
North Dakota*
8
16
50.0
2
Rhode Island*
8
16
50.0
4
Oregon
9
19
47.4
5
Louisiana
8
18
44.4
5
Minnesota*
8
18
44.4
7
Arkansas
7
16
43.8
7
Delaware*
7
16
43.8
7
New Hampshire
7
16
43.8
7
Pennsylvania*
7
16
43.8
11
Massachusetts*
7
17
41.2
11
Missouri*
7
17
41.2
13
Georgia
7
18
38.9
13
Nevada*
7
18
38.9
13
New Jersey*
7
18
38.9
16
South Dakota
6
16
37.5
16
Washington*
6
16
37.5
18
Maine*
6
17
35.3
18
Tennessee*
6
17
35.3
20
Alaska
3
9
33.3
21
Alabama
5
16
31.3
21
Nebraska*
5
16
31.3
21
New York*
5
16
31.3
21
Virginia*
5
16
31.3
25
California*
5
17
29.4
26
Colorado
5
18
27.8
26
Florida*
5
18
27.8
28
Kentucky
5
19
26.3
29
Hawaii*
2
8
25.0
29
Iowa
4
16
25.0
29
Maryland*
4
16
25.0
29
Ohio*
4
16
25.0
33
Arizona*
4
17
23.5
33
Mississippi*
4
17
23.5
33
New Mexico*
4
17
23.5
33
South Carolina
4
17
23.5
33
West Virginia*
4
17
23.5
38
Idaho
4
18
22.2
39
Oklahoma
4
19
21.1
40
Connecticut*
3
16
18.8
40
Michigan*
3
16
18.8
40
Texas*
3
16
18.8
43
Vermont*
3
17
17.6
44
Illinois
3
18
16.7
45
Wisconsin*
2
16
12.5
46
Indiana*
2
18
11.1
47
North Carolina
1
16
6.3
47
Utah*
1
16
6.3
49
Wyoming*
1
17
5.9
50
Kansas
1
18
5.6
 
Total
245
829
29.6
* Denotes a state holding a U.S. Senate election in 2012. Note: Includes special elections conducted on the general Election Day. Data compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: History Says Wisconsin's Freshmen GOP U.S. House Members Will be Safe in 2012
Next post: Kloppenburg Vote Tally Largest in WI History for Contested Supreme Court Race

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting