Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Did Obama Mislead Americans on Trends in U.S. Troop Fatalities?

Bookmark and Share

U.S. troop fatalities in Iraq are on pace for a 16 percent increase from 2010; American deaths in Afghanistan over the last three months are up 7 percent from the same period in 2010.

barackobama05.jpgPresident Barack Obama's address to the nation on Afghanistan Wednesday evening came 1 year, 6 months, and 22 days since his address at West Point when he outlined his Afghanistan strategy that included a surge in troops (which began a few months later).

During his recent address, Obama made the following statement:

"We take comfort in knowing that the tide of war is receding. Fewer of our sons and daughters are serving in harm's way."

While it is true, of course, that there has been a net decline in the number U.S. troops serving in Iraq and Afghanistan collectively, since, say, the peak of the Iraqi conflict, it is not the case that fewer Americans are being killed in recent months.

In Iraq, the number of American fatalities are on pace in 2011 to eclipse the death toll in 2010 - rising by one-sixth.

Last year, 60 U.S. personnel were killed in Iraq.

In 2011, already 33 have died, which projects out to 70 for the year.

(Note: Since the invasion in early 2003, an almost identical number of Americans have been killed in Iraq during the first six months of each year, 2,305, or 44.3 per month, as the last six months of the year, 2,158, or 44.9 per month).

The nine American deaths suffered during the first 22 days of June is the second largest monthly tally in Iraq since November 2009.

In Afghanistan, since the President's December 2009 speech announcing the surge, there have been 704 U.S. fatalities, or an average of 1.24 per day.

During the same period of time prior to the surge announcement (569 days) there were 429 U.S. fatalities, or an average of 0.75 per day.

While there have been significantly more U.S. troops on the ground during the past year and a half, the President was not speaking in proportions Wednesday evening. The fact is American deaths are up 65.3 percent during this 18+ month span.

The short-term trend in Afghanistan has been even worse.

During the nearly three month period since April of this year, there have been 111 U.S. fatalities, or an average of 1.34 per day.

This is the highest U.S. fatality rate during the April through June period in the history of the 10-year Afghan conflict - up 7 percent from the same period in 2010 during the heart of the surge when an average of 1.25 Americans were being killed per day.

Unfortunately, despite the killing of Osama Bin Laden, recent trends in the loss of American lives in both Iraq and Afghanistan do not support the President's optimistic characterization that "The tide of war is receding."

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: The Myth of the Convention State Boost, Part II: The Republicans
Next post: Is It Our Turn Yet?

1 Comment


  • The short-term trend in Afghanistan has been even worse.

    During the nearly three month period since April of this year, there have been 111 U.S. fatalities, or an average of 1.34 per day.

    Uh, what's your source? By my count, US fatalities are down 3 over the last three months from a similar period in 2010, and down 14 for the year.

    (http://icasualties.org/OEF/index.aspx)

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting