Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Did Obama Mislead Americans on Trends in U.S. Troop Fatalities?

Bookmark and Share

U.S. troop fatalities in Iraq are on pace for a 16 percent increase from 2010; American deaths in Afghanistan over the last three months are up 7 percent from the same period in 2010.

barackobama05.jpgPresident Barack Obama's address to the nation on Afghanistan Wednesday evening came 1 year, 6 months, and 22 days since his address at West Point when he outlined his Afghanistan strategy that included a surge in troops (which began a few months later).

During his recent address, Obama made the following statement:

"We take comfort in knowing that the tide of war is receding. Fewer of our sons and daughters are serving in harm's way."

While it is true, of course, that there has been a net decline in the number U.S. troops serving in Iraq and Afghanistan collectively, since, say, the peak of the Iraqi conflict, it is not the case that fewer Americans are being killed in recent months.

In Iraq, the number of American fatalities are on pace in 2011 to eclipse the death toll in 2010 - rising by one-sixth.

Last year, 60 U.S. personnel were killed in Iraq.

In 2011, already 33 have died, which projects out to 70 for the year.

(Note: Since the invasion in early 2003, an almost identical number of Americans have been killed in Iraq during the first six months of each year, 2,305, or 44.3 per month, as the last six months of the year, 2,158, or 44.9 per month).

The nine American deaths suffered during the first 22 days of June is the second largest monthly tally in Iraq since November 2009.

In Afghanistan, since the President's December 2009 speech announcing the surge, there have been 704 U.S. fatalities, or an average of 1.24 per day.

During the same period of time prior to the surge announcement (569 days) there were 429 U.S. fatalities, or an average of 0.75 per day.

While there have been significantly more U.S. troops on the ground during the past year and a half, the President was not speaking in proportions Wednesday evening. The fact is American deaths are up 65.3 percent during this 18+ month span.

The short-term trend in Afghanistan has been even worse.

During the nearly three month period since April of this year, there have been 111 U.S. fatalities, or an average of 1.34 per day.

This is the highest U.S. fatality rate during the April through June period in the history of the 10-year Afghan conflict - up 7 percent from the same period in 2010 during the heart of the surge when an average of 1.25 Americans were being killed per day.

Unfortunately, despite the killing of Osama Bin Laden, recent trends in the loss of American lives in both Iraq and Afghanistan do not support the President's optimistic characterization that "The tide of war is receding."

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: The Myth of the Convention State Boost, Part II: The Republicans
Next post: Is It Our Turn Yet?

1 Comment


  • The short-term trend in Afghanistan has been even worse.

    During the nearly three month period since April of this year, there have been 111 U.S. fatalities, or an average of 1.34 per day.

    Uh, what's your source? By my count, US fatalities are down 3 over the last three months from a similar period in 2010, and down 14 for the year.

    (http://icasualties.org/OEF/index.aspx)

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Kevin McCarthy Becomes Least Tenured Floor Leader in US House History

    At less than four terms, McCarthy has served 423 fewer days in the chamber than any floor leader in U.S. House history and almost 10 years less than the average leader.

    Political Crumbs

    The Second Time Around

    Former Republican Congressman Bob Beauprez became the seventh major party or second place gubernatorial candidate in Colorado to get a second chance at the office when he narrowly won his party's nomination last month. Two of the previous six candidates were successful. Democrat Alva Adams lost his first gubernatorial bid to Benjamin Eaton in 1884, but was victorious two years later against William Meyer. Democrat Charles Johnson placed third in 1894 behind Republican Albert McIntyre and Populist incumbent Governor David Waite but returned as the Fusion (Democrat/Populist) nominee in 1898 and defeated GOPer Henry Wolcott. Gubernatorial candidates who received a second chance but lost both general elections include Democrat Thomas Patterson (1888, 1914), Progressive Edward Costigan (1912, 1914), Republican Donald Brotzman (1954, 1956), and Republican David Strickland (1978, 1986).


    How Are the Plurality Winners Doing?

    Nearly 40 percent of plurality winners of U.S. Senate elections lose their seat in the next election cycle. Will that happen to any of the three such incumbents on the ballot in 2014? Recent polling suggests Democrats Al Franken of Minnesota, Mark Begich of Alaska, and Jeff Merkley of Oregon all currently have an advantage over their nominated/frontrunning GOP opponents, but each is flirting with plurality support once again. Franken led endorsed GOPer Mike McFadden 48 to 42 percent in a new SurveyUSA poll while the polling group showed Merkley with a 50 to 32 percent advantage over Monica Wehby. Begich led each of the three major GOP candidates in last month's PPP survey: 42 to 37 percent over Daniel Sullivan, 41 to 33 percent over Mead Treadwell, and 43 to 27 percent over Joe Miller.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting