Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Chip Cravaack: Building Political Ties Between Minnesota and New Hampshire

Bookmark and Share

None of Minnesota's 134 U.S. Representatives or 39 Senators were born in the Granite State

chipcravaack10.jpgMinnesota's 8th Congressional District residents were thrown a bit of a curve ball last weekend when Republican U.S. Representative Chip Cravaack announced he will be moving to New Hampshire in order to spend more time with his children and wife (whose recent promotion at a medical-device company requires her to spend more time in nearby Boston).

While a "putting my family first" mantra is generally not a controversial defense for a political officeholder, the rulebook goes out the window when the net effect is the officeholder moves half way across the country.

Even if Cravaack is able to spend as many days in the 8th district as he did during the first half-year of his tenure when he lived in Lindstrom, Minnesota, the symbolism of leaving the state no doubt provides an opening for his eventual 2012 DFL challenger. (The Cravaack family will be buying a new home in North Branch, Minnesota to remain residents of the district).

Cravaack's announcement prompted Smart Politics to consider what heretofore has been a dearth of political ties between the Granite and Gopher States, other than the requisite pit stops its various presidential candidates have made over the last several decades.

For starters, none of Minnesota's 134 U.S. Representatives were born in New Hampshire, even though 81 of them (60.4 percent) were born outside of Minnesota across 20 different states.

A few representatives came close, but fell just outside the geographical lines, with 13 Minnesota U.S. House members born in New Hampshire's three neighboring states:

· Six were born in Maine: Republicans John Averill, Mark Dunnell, William Washburn, Solomon Comstock, Loren Fletcher, and Frank Nye.

· Four were born in Vermont: Republicans Milo White and John Gilfillan and Democrats Edmund Rice and Melvin Baldwin.

· Three were born in Massachusetts: Democrats James Cavanaugh and Winfield Hammond and Republican Frederick Stevens.

Most of these representatives served during the 1800s with Frederick Stevens the most recently elected when he won his ninth and final term in 1912.

Cravaack wasn't born in Minnesota or New Hampshire but rather Charleston, West Virginia - the only Minnesota U.S. Representative from the Mountain State.

On the U.S. Senate side, the Minnesota-New Hampshire ties are equally non-existent with none of Minnesota's 39 senators across the last 150+ years born in the Granite State.

Just 13 of Minnesota's Senators were born in state (33.3 percent) with one born in Maine (GOPer William Washburn, who also served in the House) and one in Vermont (Democrat Henry Rice, one of the state's inaugural senators).

Likewise, none of New Hampshire's 140+ U.S. Representatives or 60+ U.S. Senators were born in Minnesota.

However, the Gopher State does have a few ties to New Hampshire in state politics - with two of its governors born there.

Republican John Pillsbury, the state's 8th governor (1876-1882), was born in Sutton, New Hampshire in 1827.

Pillsbury received his education at the common schools of New Hampshire.

The state's 13th Governor, Republican David Clough (1895-1899), was born in Lyme, New Hampshire in 1846 and also attended common schools in his birth state and later Wisconsin and Minnesota.

Meanwhile, one of New Hampshire's governors, Charles Dale (1945-1949) was a Minnesota native.

Dale was born in Browns Valley, Minnesota in 1893 and also attended the U of M - earning his B.A. and J.D. there in 1915 and 1917 respectively.

Dale is one of just 12 Minnesotans who have gone on to govern other states.

Despite Cravaack's outreach to New Hampshire there is no word yet coming from the camps of fellow Republican U.S. House members Charlie Bass or Frank Guinta regarding their potential move to Minnesota before the 2012 elections.

An exchange program would only be fair, right?

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Nebraska Cornhuskers Salivating Over Big 10 Opponents
Next post: Hoekstra Challenge in Michigan U.S. Senate Race Faces Long Historical Odds

2 Comments


  • While I disagree personally with Congressman Cravaack's move, one has to also note that former Congressman Jim Oberstar had not been a resident of Minnesota for decades. He lives in Arlington, VA. That being said, Cravaack did use that issue powerfully in his campaign, and it will likely be used against him in the next.

    What is the difference between Oberstar and Cravaack both living in another State, you might ask? Well, despite having a busy life as a US Congressman, Rep Cravaack has traveled the district more since being elected than Oberstar has for years. While Oberstar was known to fly in "now and again" on select dates such as July 4th to make an appearance, he refused to meet with the people who elected him for the most part.

    Now, if Rep. Cravaack morphs into James Oberstar and refuses to visit his district for more than the occasional visit, I would agree--he probably should lose. But that has not happened.

  • I think the operative difference between Cravaack's situation and Oberstar's that Oberstar had a residence in the D.C. metro area that he kept to perform his duties in Congress. There's a whole argument that can be made that he should have spent less time there and more time in MN8, but that's separate. This is a story because the residence being set up is neither in the DC area nor in the district. It's in a whole other place. I don't think that happens very often.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Which States Own the Best Track Record in Backing Eventual GOP Presidential Nominees?

    Nine states (each with primaries) have an unblemished record in voting for the eventual Republican nominee since 1976 - and not all host contests on the back end of the calendar.

    Political Crumbs

    Evolving?

    When Scott Walker "punted" back in February after being asked if he was comfortable with the idea of evolution he added, "That's a question a politician shouldn't be involved in one way or the other." However, it may very well be a question that is asked at one of the upcoming GOP debates this year. In South Carolina during the first GOP debate in 2012, FOX News' Juan Williams asked Tim Pawlenty, "Do you equate the teaching of creationism with the teaching of evolution as the basis for what should be taught for our nation's schools?" Pawlenty replied, "There should be room in the curriculum for study of intelligent design" but that it was up to the local school districts if it should be in a science class or comparative theory class. At the fourth Republican debate held in California, Jon Huntsman addressed the GOP becoming "anti-science" thusly: "Listen, when you make comments that fly in the face of what 98 out of 100 climate scientists have said, when you call into question the science of evolution, all I'm saying is that, in order for the Republican Party to win, we can't run from science. We can't run from mainstream conservative philosophy."


    73 Months and Counting

    January's preliminary Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers show Minnesota's unemployment rate of 3.7 percent was once again lower than Wisconsin's 5.0 percent. That marks the 73rd consecutive month in which Minnesota has boasted a lower jobless rate than its neighbor to the east dating back to January 2009 including each of the last 67 months by at least one point. The Gopher State has now edged Wisconsin in the employment border battle for 204 of the last 216 months dating back to February 1997. Wisconsin only managed a lower unemployment rate than Minnesota for the 12 months of 2008 during this 18-year span.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting