Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Minnesota 2012 US Senate Race Fundraising Down 65 Percent from 2008

Bookmark and Share

Nearly $7 million more had been raised at this stage of the 2008 campaign

amyklobuchar10.jpgWith Amy Klobuchar not yet confronted with a competitive challenger, it is no surprise that fundraising in Minnesota's 2012 U.S. Senate race is thus far a drop in the bucket compared to the kind of money that was changing hands at this stage of the election cycle in the Gopher State's 2008 race.

Overall, Senator Klobuchar has raised $4.1 million for the cycle to date through the 2nd Quarter of 2011.

With DFLer Dick Franson and Republican Doc Severson chipping in another $15K, that means all U.S. Senate candidates in the Gopher State have netted a total of $4,154,235 for the cycle.

At this point in the 2008 contest (through June 2007), more than $10.9 million had already been raised in a race that featured another one-term Senator, Republican incumbent Norm Coleman, and eventual DFL nominee and victor Al Franken.

Coleman had collected $6.8 million through June 2007 with Franken just shy of half that amount at $3.2 million.

DFLer Mike Ciresi's campaign had collected $746K with fellow Democrats Bob Olson and Dick Franson adding another $35K to the pot.

All told, more than $10.9 million had been raised at this stage of the 2008 Senate race.

After adjusting for inflation, the amount of money raised by Minnesota U.S. Senate campaigns for the 2012 cycle is down 65 percent compared to four years ago when $11,872,622 had been collected through June 2007 in 2011 dollars.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Hoekstra Challenge in Michigan U.S. Senate Race Faces Long Historical Odds
Next post: Keeping Up with the Smiths: Surnames in the U.S. House

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Which States Have the Longest and Shortest Election Day Voting Hours?

Residents in some North Dakota towns have less than half as many hours to cast their ballots as those in New York State.

Political Crumbs

No 100-Year Curse for Roberts

Defeating his Tea Party primary challenger Milton Wolf with just 48.1 percent of the vote, Pat Roberts narrowly escaped becoming the first elected U.S. Senator from Kansas to lose a renomination bid in 100 years. The last - and so far only - elected U.S. Senator to lose a Kansas primary was one-term Republican Joseph Bristow in 1914. Bristow was defeated by former U.S. Senator Charles Curtis who went on to win three terms before becoming Herbert Hoover's running mate in 1928. Only one other U.S. Senator from the Sunflower State has lost a primary since the passage of the 17th Amendment: Sheila Frahm in 1996. Frahm was appointed to fill Bob Dole's seat earlier that year and finished 13.2 points behind Sam Brownback in the three-candidate primary field. Overall, incumbent senators from Kansas have won 29 times against two defeats in the direct vote era. (Curtis also lost a primary in 1912 to Walter Stubbs, one year before the nation moved to direct elections).


The Second Time Around

Former Republican Congressman Bob Beauprez became the seventh major party or second place gubernatorial candidate in Colorado to get a second chance at the office when he narrowly won his party's nomination last month. Two of the previous six candidates were successful. Democrat Alva Adams lost his first gubernatorial bid to Benjamin Eaton in 1884, but was victorious two years later against William Meyer. Democrat Charles Johnson placed third in 1894 behind Republican Albert McIntyre and Populist incumbent Governor David Waite but returned as the Fusion (Democrat/Populist) nominee in 1898 and defeated GOPer Henry Wolcott. Gubernatorial candidates who received a second chance but lost both general elections include Democrat Thomas Patterson (1888, 1914), Progressive Edward Costigan (1912, 1914), Republican Donald Brotzman (1954, 1956), and Republican David Strickland (1978, 1986).


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting