Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Nebraska Cornhuskers Salivating Over Big 10 Opponents

Bookmark and Share

In just over a month, the college football season will be in full swing with the Nebraska Cornhuskers much-anticipated arrival in the Big 10. Nebraska has a 39-6 record (.867) against current Big 10 teams since 1962, with 11 victories and only one loss since 1985 (a 40-7 blowout suffered at Penn State in 2002). However, the team only has a record of 78-68-9 (.532) against its 11 new conference rivals all-time. Nebraska's school record against its slate of Big 10 opponents in 2011 is 64-56-5 (.532) with winning records against Michigan State (5-0), Iowa (26-12-3), Northwestern (2-1), and Wisconsin (3-2), and losing records against Penn State (6-7), Minnesota (20-29-2), Michigan (2-3), and Ohio State (0-2). The Cornhuskers also have a winning record against Illinois (7-2-1) and losing records against Indiana (7-9-3) and Purdue (0-1).

Previous post: Tim Kaine's Ball and Chain: His DNC Past
Next post: Chip Cravaack: Building Political Ties Between Minnesota and New Hampshire

2 Comments


  • The only thing that matters is what happens starting in October.

  • Historic statistics are not significant here. However, prospects look good for the Huskers football program this year with Wisconsin having to replace its quarterback and significant others on the O-Line, Ohio State melting down, and getting to play Michigan State and Iowa in Lincoln. However, the other Big Ten teams are no cake walks either, so Nebraska must play very well in all Big Ten games to be its champion and this means playing much more consistently in 2011 which may be more than a little difficult with a new Offensive Coordinator and playbook. If all goes well, though, the Huskers should win most if not all of its Big Ten games if it wants to.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Strange Bedfellows: A Historical Review of Divided US Senate Delegations

    Over the last century, states have been twice as likely to be represented by a single political party in the U.S. Senate than have a split delegation; only Delaware, Iowa, and Illinois have been divided more than half the time.

    Political Crumbs

    Haugh to Reach New Heights

    The North Carolina U.S. Senate race between Democratic incumbent Kay Hagan and Republican Thom Tillis may go down to the wire next Tuesday, but along the way Libertarian nominee Sean Haugh is poised to set a state record for a non-major party candidate. Haugh, who previously won 1.5 percent of the vote in the Tar Heel State's 2002 race, has polled at or above five percent in 10 of the last 12 polls that included his name. The current high water mark for a third party or independent candidate in a North Carolina U.S. Senate election is just 3.3 percent, recorded by Libertarian Robert Emory back in 1992. Only one other candidate has eclipsed the three percent mark - Libertarian Christopher Cole with 3.1 percent in 2008.


    Gubernatorial Highs and Lows

    Two sitting governors currently hold the record for the highest gubernatorial vote ever received in their respective states by a non-incumbent: Republican Matt Mead of Wyoming (65.7 percent in 2010) and outgoing GOPer Dave Heineman of Nebraska (73.4 percent in 2006). Republican Gary Herbert of Utah had not previously won a gubernatorial contest when he notched a state record 64.1 percent for his first victory in 2010, but was an incumbent at the time after ascending to the position in 2009 after the early departure of Jon Huntsman. Meanwhile, two sitting governors hold the record in their states for the lowest mark ever recorded by a winning gubernatorial candidate (incumbent or otherwise): independent-turned-Democrat Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island (36.1 percent in 2010) and Democrat Terry McAuliffe of Virginia (47.8 percent in 2013).


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting