Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Check Mate: Does Rick Perry Play Chess?

Bookmark and Share

None of the last five Republican presidents were chess players, whereas eight of the last nine Democratic presidents played the game

rickperry10.jpgFrom the folks-will-make-of-this-what-they-will files, a recent article published at ChessBase compiled a table listing which presidents in U.S. history played chess, as determined by reports in various news articles and presidential biographies.

A perusal of the list finds one eyebrow-raising trend over the past 125+ years.

Since the Chester Arthur administration in the early 1880s, 89 percent of Democratic presidents have been chess players (8 of 9), compared to just 29 percent of Republicans (4 of 14).

The only Democratic president dating back to Grover Cleveland who did not play chess was the nation's 36th President, Lyndon B. Johnson.

Every other Democratic president during this span is reported to be a chess player - from a casual dabbler in the game, such as Franklin Roosevelt and John Kennedy, to more serious players such as Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter.

Clinton was a member of the chess team while an undergrad at Georgetown University in the late 1960s.

As a whole, Republican presidents over the last century have been less taken by the sport.

In fact, none of the last five Republican presidents were chess players: Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and George W. Bush. (Note: Though Nixon did famously deliver an emotional "Checkers speech" - referencing his family dog - while under scrutiny for improprieties in handling his campaign funds as a Vice-Presidential nominee in 1952).

That was not the case, however, among the early Republican presidents of the 19th Century.

The first four such GOPers - Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, Rutherford B. Hayes, and James Garfield - all partook in the centuries-old game a great deal.

The four Twentieth Century Republican presidents who did enjoy the occasional game of chess were Teddy Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, Calvin Coolidge, and Dwight Eisenhower.

And will Barack Obama, who has played the game for years, square off against a fellow chess player in the Election of 2012?

The answer to that question might be discovered in an upcoming debate - perhaps in one of the light-hearted lightning rounds (or 'this or that' sidebars) - in which an attempt to humanize the debate participants often results in awkwardness and a critical drubbing of the moderator.

So, "Chess or checkers, Governor Perry?"

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Ron Paul's Hotbeds of Financial Support: New Hampshire, Nevada, Wyoming, and Alaska
Next post: Romney's Strongest 2012 Fundraising Locales Identical to 2008: UT, CT, DC, MA, ID

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Which States Own the Best Track Record in Backing Eventual GOP Presidential Nominees?

Nine states (each with primaries) have an unblemished record in voting for the eventual Republican nominee since 1976 - and not all host contests on the back end of the calendar.

Political Crumbs

Evolving?

When Scott Walker "punted" back in February after being asked if he was comfortable with the idea of evolution he added, "That's a question a politician shouldn't be involved in one way or the other." However, it may very well be a question that is asked at one of the upcoming GOP debates this year. In South Carolina during the first GOP debate in 2012, FOX News' Juan Williams asked Tim Pawlenty, "Do you equate the teaching of creationism with the teaching of evolution as the basis for what should be taught for our nation's schools?" Pawlenty replied, "There should be room in the curriculum for study of intelligent design" but that it was up to the local school districts if it should be in a science class or comparative theory class. At the fourth Republican debate held in California, Jon Huntsman addressed the GOP becoming "anti-science" thusly: "Listen, when you make comments that fly in the face of what 98 out of 100 climate scientists have said, when you call into question the science of evolution, all I'm saying is that, in order for the Republican Party to win, we can't run from science. We can't run from mainstream conservative philosophy."


73 Months and Counting

January's preliminary Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers show Minnesota's unemployment rate of 3.7 percent was once again lower than Wisconsin's 5.0 percent. That marks the 73rd consecutive month in which Minnesota has boasted a lower jobless rate than its neighbor to the east dating back to January 2009 including each of the last 67 months by at least one point. The Gopher State has now edged Wisconsin in the employment border battle for 204 of the last 216 months dating back to February 1997. Wisconsin only managed a lower unemployment rate than Minnesota for the 12 months of 2008 during this 18-year span.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting