Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Big GOP Gain in NY-09 Mirrors 50-Year Average in New York US House Special Elections

Bookmark and Share

Turner's 29-point net bump from the 2010 general is just 1-point shy of the 30-point average gain against the vacating party since 1962

bobturner.jpgWhile Democrats are licking their wounds from David Weprin's loss to Republican Bob Turner in New York's 9th Congressional District special election on Tuesday, it should come as little surprise that the GOP made such large strides in the district compared to last November.

Last week, Smart Politics profiled special elections in the Empire State over the past 50 years and noted that not only had 5 of the last 18 such contests seen a flip in partisan control (now 6 of 19 with Turner's victory), but the challenging party had consistently gained on the vacating party by substantial margins.

As it turns out, the five-decade historical trend was a dead on predictor in Tuesday's race.

The previous 18 U.S. House special elections held in New York State over the last 50 years found the vacating incumbent's party average a 30-point average drop in margin of victory during this span.

In New York's 9th CD contest Tuesday, Republicans came storming back to the tune of a 29-point turnaround from the 2010 general election.

With more than 92 percent of precincts reporting, the GOP erased Anthony Weiner's 21.7-point victory over Bob Turner in 2010 with a margin of victory in the special election that currently sits at 6.9 percent - or a 28.6-point overall bump from 10 months prior.

Such large turnarounds are quite common in special elections, with the challenging party notching a 28+ point net gain in now 12 of the last 19 such races since 1962 including four of the last six since 1998.

Tuesday's race marked the eighth out of the last 19 races decided by a 7-point margin or less, including four of the last five special elections.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Barrett vs. Walker II: A History of Wisconsin Gubernatorial Rematch Elections

Losing gubernatorial candidates have come back for rematches against victorious Republicans and beat them two times out of the six rematches in Wisconsin history.

Political Crumbs

Governor vs. Governor vs. Governor

The last election cycle saw five ex-governors attempt to win back their old jobs, with success stories in California (Jerry Brown), Iowa (Terry Branstad), and Oregon (John Kitzhaber). But in 1904, the State of Wisconsin saw three governors on the general election ballot: two-term Republican incumbent Robert La Follette, former two-term Democratic Governor William Peck (elected in 1890 and 1892), and former two-term Republican Governor Edward Scofield (elected in 1896 and 1898). La Follette - with Teddy Roosevelt at the top of the ticket winning the presidency - cruised to an 11.3-point victory over Peck with 50.5 percent of the vote. Scofield ran a distant fourth on the National Republican ticket with just 2.7 percent - also losing to Social Democrat William Arnold who received 5.5 percent, but beating Prohibition and Socialist Labor candidates.


A Vote for No One

More than 50,000 North Carolina residents who voted in the Tuesday's Republican presidential primary opted for 'no preference' on their ballot, or 5.2 percent. That marks the second highest percentage of those who have done so in the 40 years of the modern primary era, behind the 9.8 percent who indicated no preference during George H.W. Bush's rout over Pat Buchanan in the state twenty years ago in 1992. In 2008, 4.0 percent were likewise noncommittal, with 1.7 percent voting no preference in 2000, 3.8 percent in 1996, 1.0 percent in 1988, 2.7 percent in 1980, and 1.7 percent in 1976.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting