Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Equal Time? Romney Records One Quarter of Face Time at New Hampshire Debate

Bookmark and Share

Romney received 25 percent of the speaking time at Tuesday's debate - nearly twice the time of most candidates and nearly three times the amount of Huntsman and Santorum

mittromney11.jpgAlthough passing mention is given at the start of most debates that efforts will be made to give all candidates equal time, the disparity in time allotted to the candidates was startling during Tuesday's Republican debate at Dartmouth College.

A Smart Politics content analysis of the New Hampshire debate finds that former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney tallied a full one-quarter of the speaking time given to the GOP field, or precisely double what would be an evenly distributed amount of time between the eight candidates.

Romney spoke for 18 minutes and 12 seconds Tuesday evening, out of the 72 minutes and 49 seconds allotted to the 2012 Republican hopefuls throughout the evening.

Romney was followed by Rick Perry who notched 14.1 percent of the speaking time (10 minutes 16 seconds), Herman Cain at 12.5 percent (9 minutes, 5 seconds), Michele Bachmann at 12.3 percent (8 minutes, 59 seconds), Newt Gingrich at 9.7 percent (7 minutes, 5 seconds), Ron Paul at 9.2 percent (6 minutes, 43 seconds), Jon Huntsman at 8.6 percent (6 minutes, 17 seconds), and Rick Santorum at 8.5 percent (6 minutes, 12 seconds).

While Romney's total was boosted in small part due to four of his seven opponents asking questions of him after halftime (Cain, Gingrich, Huntsman, and Perry), Romney was still outpacing his field in camera time by a large margin even at that point of the debate.

At the midway point, Romney had spoke for 7 minutes and 25 seconds - more than Gingrich, Paul, Huntsman, and Santorum recorded for the entire debate.

The dominating presence of Romney during the debate Tuesday - a combination of his comparatively strong debating skills plus the prominent platform he is receiving from the moderators - is a continuation of a surge in camera time he has enjoyed over the last few debates.

For example, in the Florida CNN/Tea Party debate last month, Romney tallied just 15.8 percent of the floor time (10 minutes, 56 seconds), well behind the 20.0 percent given to Perry (13 minutes, 48 seconds).

Michele Bachmann was third in speaking time at that debate with 12.5 percent (8 minutes 40 seconds), followed by Jon Huntsman at 11.3 percent (7 minutes, 49 seconds).

In the subsequent Florida FOX News/Google debate, Romney received the most air time at 12 minutes and 1 second or 19.9 percent of the the eight candidate field (recalculating percentages after removing Gary Johnson from the data).

Rick Perry fell to 16.8 percent in that debate (10 minutes, 8 seconds), followed by John Huntsman at 12.7 percent (7 minutes, 41 seconds), and Rick Santorum at 12.0 percent (7 minutes, 14 seconds).

Perry's declining face time has been a windfall for both Romney and Herman Cain.

Cain tallied the least amount of speaking time in the first Florida debate (8.1 percent, 5 minutes, 34 seconds), increasing to fifth most in the second Florida debate (10.7 percent, 6 minutes, 27 seconds), and third most in New Hampshire (12.5 percent, 9 minutes, 5 seconds).

The extent of the former Massachusetts governor's face time on Tuesday relative to the other candidates on the stage can also be viewed as follows. Romney recorded:

· 194 percent more camera time than Rick Santorum
· 190 percent more than Jon Huntsman
· 171 percent more than Ron Paul
· 157 percent more than Newt Gingrich
· 103 percent more than Michele Bachmann
· 100 percent more than Herman Cain
· 77 percent more than Rick Perry

Overall, across the last three debates, Romney has tallied 41 minutes and 9 seconds of speaking time, which is nearly seven minutes more than the next closest candidate, Rick Perry (at 34 minutes, 12 seconds).

Michele Bachmann comes in a distant third with 23 minutes and 59 seconds, followed by Huntsman (21 minutes, 47 seconds), Cain (21 minutes, 6 seconds), Gingrich (20 minutes, 41 seconds), Santorum (20 minutes, 38 seconds), and Paul (18 minutes, 47 seconds).

The fact that Congressman Paul has received less than half the amount of speaking time as Romney (and less than any other candidate) is curious considering the libertarian firebrand has run third or fourth in most polls throughout the last several months.

Time Allotted to Republican Presidential Candidates During the Last Three Debates

Candidate
 % FL 1
% FL 2*
% NH 2
Total time
Romney
15.8
19.9
25.0
41 min. 9 sec.
Perry
20.0
16.8
14.1
34 min. 12 sec.
Bachmann
12.5
10.5
12.3
23 min. 59 sec.
Huntsman
11.3
12.7
8.6
21 min. 47 sec.
Cain
8.1
10.7
12.5
21 min. 6 sec.
Gingrich
11.1
9.8
9.7
20 min. 41 sec.
Santorum
10.4
12.0
8.5
20 min. 38 sec.
Paul
10.7
7.7
9.2
18 min. 47 sec.
* Percentages from Florida's FOX/Google debate recalculated after eliminating the time allotted to former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson (who spoke for 4 minutes and 9 seconds) who was not invited to participate in the other debates. Data compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Right-to-Work: Red Meat in Red States?
Next post: National Review's Ramesh Ponnuru to Speak at Humphrey School

10 Comments


  • Good to see that the Ron-Paulers were right (again).

    How is a candidate supposed to get more face time when the media refuses to point and click the camera? The internets?

    (blackthisout)

  • I saw the little tricks Charlie Rose and the Bloomberg and Washington Post moderators were using to give Romney more airtime . Romney was asked a question and had one minute to respond , but at the end of Romneys one minute , another moderator would ask Romney to be more clear or whatever , giving Romney ANOTHER minute of airtime ... at one point there in the debate , Romney was asked if a global meltdown occured , what would Romney do ... Romney spoke to all 3 moderators on that on question for a straight 5 minutes ?

  • thank you Humphrey School of Public Affairs
    from Washington University in Saint Louis 81

    no more Puppet Presidents

  • Black this out

  • Blackthisout.com

  • Marginalizing a 3rd place Ron Paul by giving no time is completely obvious. As others on this thread have said, we will simply click here and BLACK THIS OUT

  • Yet, no one does anything about it. We just sit here and whine on the reviews and comments. The moderators are the ones who need to be challenged by the public. It's time to "Occupy The News" or the "Debate" and make this happen. It will be our fault for not taking action right away and holding the moderators responsible. When you are pushed, push back!

  • ███ ████ is the only unique, presidential candidate and should receive 50% of the airtime of all others combined. If people vote for anyone else, they are bringing doom upon themselves. And they will deserve it for not doing their homework but just being fed what the gov/media are feeding them. ███ ████ in 2012 or G*d help us all.

  • When we let the same media choose the president each year we get the same policies. They don't work.

    You can choose the president by researching the issues and the candidates. When you do you'll find Cain outright lies to the public when Paul asked him a question during the debate, Romney created Romneycare which became Obamacare, and Perry used force to make little girls take drugs that he thought were beneficial, regardless of what they or their parents thought.

    Ron Paul is the only one. If someone offered you a million dollars, you probably wouldn't believe them, and wouldn't get very excited. If they showed it to you, you'd go nuts. Ron Paul supporters are energized because they know he will deliver as he has for the past 40 years.

  • Thank you for this post, very telling as to whom the media favors, and from my state as well :-)

    The Ron Paul Media Black out is about as obvious as the Sun on a cloudless summer day. Just ridiculous, at least the writer gave some time to Ron Paul. Great post. Can't wait to read more.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting