Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Study: Faint Praise for Obama in U.S. House After Qaddafi's Death

Bookmark and Share

Only six House Democrats and one Republican issue press releases crediting the president in ending the Libyan dictator's regime

barackobama05.jpgAfter the killing of Osama Bin Laden last May by U.S. special forces in Pakistan, the vast majority of U.S. Representatives issued press releases giving credit to America's armed forces, as well as other institutions and officials, for the important role they played in that high profile victory in the war on terror.

A Smart Politics study found the reaction in the U.S. House to that event showed a definite partisan tilt, with Republicans generally wary to give President Barack Obama any credit for the mission and most Democrats unwilling to mention the efforts of President George W. Bush in the region over the previous several years.

However, after the killing of the Libyan dictator who was responsible for the deaths of nearly 200 U.S. citizens, the House struck a more unified tone in their reaction.

Silence.

A Smart Politics content analysis of press releases issued on the official U.S. House member websites through Saturday evening finds that only 12 percent of U.S. Representatives issued statements on Qaddafi and the Libyan mission after the dictator's death (53 of 434) and less than two percent of the House gave any credit to the Obama administration including just one Republican.

Overall, the Democratic caucus was slightly more likely to issue a formal statement on the Libyan situation, with 29 of 192 members doing so (15.1 percent) compared to 24 of 242 Republicans (9.9 percent).

Press Releases Issued by U.S. Representatives on Libya After Qaddafi's Death

Statements
Yes
No
% Yes
Democrat
29
163
15.1
GOP
24
218
9.9
Total
53
381
12.2
Note: Press releases tabulated from those appearing on the official U.S. House websites of all 434 currently seated members. Tabled compiled by Smart Politics.

And of these 53 members who addressed the end of the Qaddafi regime, to whom did they give credit?

Support was divided between a variety of institutions, nations, and officials, with some members giving credit to more than one.

A plurality of 10 representatives gave credit to the Libyan people, particularly the rebel forces:

"Despite having been oppressed by Qaddafi and members of his tyrannical regime for over 40 years, the courageous Libyan revolutionaries have taken back their country." - Jean Schmidt (OH-02)

"Over the last seven months, Libyan rebels have fought for their freedom and to finally end Gadhafi's regime of oppression." - Kathy Hochul (NY-26)

"It is just that the movement for democracy that spread throughout the Middle East has swept through Libya and empowered its people to bring an end to Gaddafi's oil-fueled dictatorship." - Ed Markey (MA-07)

Another nine representatives praised America's allies and NATO, while six credited the U.S. military, four the Arab League, four the United Nations, and four the United States generally.

Only seven Representatives released statements praising the Obama administration - six Democrats and one Republican.

The six Democrats were House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (CA-08), DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL-20), Allyson Schwartz (PA-13), Jim Moran (VA-08), John Garamendi (CA-10), and a qualified endorsement by Niki Tsongas (MA-05).

"The strong action taken by the United States, led by President Obama, and NATO, the United Nations and the Arab League proves the power of the world community working together." - Nancy Pelosi (CA-08)

"I thank all of the brave men and women who have dedicated themselves to this mission over the last eight months, and I am grateful to President Obama for his leadership, demonstrating once again that the United States stood with people fighting to cast off tyranny." - Debbie Wasserman Schulz (FL-20)

"We can take pride in President Obama's leadership in support of the Libyan rebels efforts to remove this oppressive dictator as a threat to his own people and to America and our allies." - Allyson Schwartz (PA-13)

"I congratulate the Obama Administration for its comprehensive and effective strategy of diplomatic and military support for the Transitional National Council, which has brought us to this day." - Jim Moran (VA-08)

"President Obama and his national security team have admirably focused on promoting a swift end to this conflict and on transitioning to a democratic government." - John Garamendi (CA-10)

"While I believe that President Obama should have come to Congress before acting in Libya, he should be commended for avoiding a prolonged military commitment, forming a strong international coalition, and for keeping US boots off the ground." - Niki Tsongas (MA-05)

And as for the one Republican who acknowledged Obama's efforts - Leonard Lance from New Jersey's 7th CD - he actually ended up giving more praise to Hillary Clinton than the president:

"Confirmation of the death of Muammar el-Qaddafi is a tremendous victory for our U.S. Military, our NATO allies and most important for the people of Libya who for too long have endured his terrorist regime and long record of brutality. The Obama Administration, especially Secretary Clinton, also deserves credit for their work on this issue." - Leonard Lance (NJ-07)

But perhaps the most telling statistic is that of the 53 members who wrote press releases on the Libyan situation this week, 31 of them did not give credit to anyone (21 Republicans and 10 Democrats).

The operational cause or reason for Qaddafi's fall was not mentioned in their releases.

Instead, their statements focused on Qaddafi's acts of terrorism (especially the bombing of 1989 Pan Am Flight 103), the need to account for missing weapons across the country, the hope that Libya will set up Democratic institutions, the removal of U.S. troops from the arena, and the need to prevent Islamic radicals from taking control of Libya:

"We must be vigilant to prevent any radical elements in Libya from using this transition to take that country in the wrong direction." - Donald Manzullo (IL-16)

"While our military involvement in Libya should come to a swift end, we must continue to work with the new Libyan government to secure unaccounted-for weapons which have the potential to fall into the hands of terrorists or their backers" - Mike Fitzpatrick (PA-08)

"I have continued to stress that it is important we do all we can to secure and render safe Libya's large stockpile of chemical weapons and other advanced weapons. This is especially crucial during this time of transition to new leadership in Libya. The world cannot afford for Libya's dangerous weapons to fall into the hands of terrorists who are working hard to acquire them." - Mike Rogers (MI-08)

Moreover, some members took this opportunity to take a swipe at the president for his handling of the Libyan situation.

"I still firmly believe that the Constitution entrusts Congress -- not the President acting alone -- to decide when to use America's military might. I do not believe that the President fulfilled his obligation to seek Congress' approval with respect to military operations in Libya." - Michael Capuano (MA-08)

"While I have serious concerns about the Obama Administration's decision to launch Libyan air strikes without seeking the constitutionally-mandated approval of Congress, there is no denying that Qaddafi was a tyrant and a terrorist." - Steve Southerland (FL-02)

And then there is Ohio Democratic U.S. Representative and former presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich who decided to issue a press release not on the end of the Qaddafi reign of terror, but on the bipartisan lawsuit brought by 10 members of Congress against the Obama administration to go to war in Libya in the first instance.

"This lawsuit is not just about checking executive power, but also about securing the right of Members of Congress to defend the constitutionally required balance of power in court. This case can help set an important precedent on both issues." - Dennis Kucinich (OH-10)

And just as the President and the vast majority of members of Congress never could agree on what the proper U.S. policy should be in the Libyan conflict - and the constitutional process for implementing that policy - those U.S. Representatives issuing statements likewise could not agree on which of the many spellings of the former Libyan dictator's name to use in their press release.

A plurality of 21 representatives opted for "Qaddafi" (40 percent), with 12 each choosing "Gadhafi" and "Gaddafi." Another seven U.S. House members used "Qadhafi" and one did not mention the dictator by his name.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Wednesday's Pay Day
Next post: 50 State GOP Fundraising Scorecard: Romney 36, Perry 6, Paul 5, Pawlenty 2, Johnson 1

1 Comment


  • Thanks for the interesting analysis ... I wonder if the Senate had similar trend considering that the House was in pro-forma session (if they were in session, there staffs may have been available to crank out the press releases.)

    A suggestion : How many Members of Congress issued press releases concerning President Obama's announcement that the American troops would return home in accordance with the SOFA agreed to by President Bush ? Now, here's the question ... how many said THANKS to the troops and their families ? And who did not ? (HINT : Read Congresswoman Bachmann's press release.)

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting