Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics

Can Massachusetts GOP End Its 88 US House Seat Pick-Up Drought in Frank's Open 4th CD?

Bookmark and Share

Bay State Republicans have the second biggest dry spell in the nation and have picked off just 2 of 284 Democratic U.S. House seats since 1944

barneyfrank10.jpgWhile the Republican Party's odds in winning a U.S. House seat in Massachusetts may have increased somewhat with the retirement of Barney Frank in 2012, the Bay State's GOP undeniably has a long historical hurdle to clear to realize that goal.

True, the state's 4th Congressional District map tilted slightly to the right with its new district lines, and an open seat race usually clears the pathway a little wider for the challenging party.

However, Massachusetts Democrats have defended their House seats on a scale bested by only one other state in the nation, and have locked down a near vise-like grip over the congressional seats they have won since World War II.

A Smart Politics review of Massachusetts electoral history finds that not only do Bay State Democrats own a nation-best 82 consecutive victories in U.S. House contests (winning each race since 1996), but also the second best streak in the country in preventing Republican pick-ups at 88 (defending all of its districts since 1994).

The Democratic consecutive victory tally in U.S. House contests began with their sweep of the state's 10 congressional districts in 1996 - picking up the 3rd and 6th CD that they had lost in 1992 and holding their other eight seats.

Democrats then swept all districts across the next seven general election cycles through 2010, plus won special elections in the 9th CD (2001) and 5th CD (2007) to run their current U.S House winning streak to 82 straight seats.

After defeating Democratic incumbents in the 3rd and 6th CDs in 1992, Republicans in Massachusetts have now failed to pick up a Democratic seat in 88 consecutive races dating back to 1994 - the second biggest dry spell in the nation behind only California Republicans.

After Janice Hahn's special election victory over Craig Huey in California's 36th Congressional District in mid-July, Democrats have now successfully held 200 consecutive seats in general and special elections conducted in the Golden State since a special election victory in CA-42 in 1999.

Far behind California (200 seats) and Massachusetts (88) is Oregon in third place where the GOP has failed to pick up a seat in 32 consecutive races in the Beaver State dating back to a special election in the 3rd CD in 1996.

Rhode Island is next on the list with a Republican pick-up drought in 18 straight races since 1992, followed by Maine at 15 (1996), Connecticut at 13 (2004), Iowa at 11 (1998), Oklahoma at five (2002), Utah at five (2002), Kentucky at five (2006), and Vermont at two (2008).

Largest Consecutive Number of Democratic U.S. House Seat Holds by State

Year of last GOP pick-up
Year beginning perfect Democratic holds
Democratic hold streak
Rhode Island
Includes general and special elections. Data compiled by Smart Politics.

In Massachusetts, Democrats have been on an incredible run in holding their own districts dating back to the close of World War II.

Since 1944, Democrats have held 282 of 284 U.S. House seats in general and special elections, or 99.3 percent.

In other words, Republicans have picked off Democratic House seats in Massachusetts at a rate of just 0.7 percent.

By contrast, Democrats have picked off Republican seats in the Bay State at a rate of more than 12 times that amount at 9.0 percent, taking 11 of 122 GOP-controlled U.S. House seats during this 66-year span.

Massachusetts Republicans have seen their 10-seat delegation from 1944 erode to its current level of zero with Democrats picking up seats in 1946, 1948, 1954, 1958, 1972, 1974, 1982, and 1996.

Aside from the loss of the two seats in 1992, the only other instance of a Democratic-held district changing partisan control occurred in 1962 - although it comes with an asterisk.

In that cycle, Massachusetts lost two seats due to reapportionment (from 14 to 12) - one Democratic and one Republican.

Additionally, the 12th CD Democratic incumbent John McCormack ran and won in the new 9th CD while the 9th CD Republican incumbent Keith Hastings ran and won in the new 12th CD.

In short, it was an equal swap for the two parties as districts were renumbered, so the only true black marks on the Democratic resume in defending its home turf over the last 66 years came in 1992 when incumbent Joseph Early was defeated in the 3rd CD by GOPer Peter Blute and incumbent Nicholas Mavroules lost in the 6th CD to Republican Peter Torkildsen.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Covering the Anti-Romney: A Five-Month Week-by-Week Media Analysis of the GOP Field
Next post: Impenetrable: Which States Have the Greatest Democratic Dry Spells in Picking Up US House Seats?

1 Comment

  • As Massachusetts Republican it will be a difficult trend to reverse unless one or more of the following happens.

    1) There is a massive demographic change in the state where Democractic efforts to consolidate power via redistricting will be ineffective. This type of sea change is part of how the Democrats managed to wrest control from the old guard MA Republican house of Cabot-Lodge 1/2 a century ago.

    2) Massachusetts Republicans manage to win local seats and get control of the MA House, where it could solidify its position. Republicans do win state house seats. The MA GOP picked up quite a few seats this last go around. However, one freshman GOP House member just had their district eliminated again via re-districting

    3) The MA GOP totally caves on wedge social issues and argues only on fiscal grounds. The Democratic led House has seen 2 of the last 3 House Speakers go to prison. It is there to be had if the argument is about corruption and waste. I do not see MA voters becoming more socially conservative, however, I do know that there are alot of independent voters who will follow a fiscally conservative message.

    In some ways what happens here in MA hardly resembles Democracy and has many of the same abuses as many 1 party states, be they national or what have you.

    Control of re-destricting by State Houses serves to quell dissent and silence opposition candidates.

    Anyway, interesting post, it is unfortunate to live in a state where your voice doesn't appear to matter.

  • Leave a comment

    Remains of the Data

    No Free Passes: States With 2 Major Party Candidates in Every US House Race

    Indiana has now placed candidates from both major parties on the ballot in a nation-best 189 consecutive U.S. House races, with New Hampshire, Minnesota, Idaho, and Montana also north of 100 in a row.

    Political Crumbs

    Gubernatorial Highs and Lows

    Two sitting governors currently hold the record for the highest gubernatorial vote ever received in their respective states by a non-incumbent: Republican Matt Mead of Wyoming (65.7 percent in 2010) and outgoing GOPer Dave Heineman of Nebraska (73.4 percent in 2006). Republican Gary Herbert of Utah had not previously won a gubernatorial contest when he notched a state record 64.1 percent for his first victory in 2010, but was an incumbent at the time after ascending to the position in 2009 after the early departure of Jon Huntsman. Meanwhile, two sitting governors hold the record in their states for the lowest mark ever recorded by a winning gubernatorial candidate (incumbent or otherwise): independent-turned-Democrat Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island (36.1 percent in 2010) and Democrat Terry McAuliffe of Virginia (47.8 percent in 2013).

    An Idaho Six Pack

    Two-term Idaho Republican Governor Butch Otter only polled at 39 percent in a recent PPP survey of the state's 2014 race - just four points ahead of Democratic businessman A.J. Balukoff. Otter's low numbers reflect his own struggles as a candidate (witness his weak primary win against State Senator Russ Fulcher) combined with the opportunity for disgruntled Idahoans to cast their votes for one of four third party and independent candidates, who collectively received the support of 12 percent of likely voters: Libertarian John Bujak, the Constitution Party's Steve Pankey, and independents Jill Humble and Pro-Life (aka Marvin Richardson). The six candidate options in a gubernatorial race sets an all-time record in the Gem State across the 46 elections conducted since statehood. The previous high water mark of five candidates was reached in seven previous cycles: 1902, 1904, 1908, 1912, 1914, 1966, and 2010.


    Humphrey School Sites
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Foreign affairs
    Race and ethnicity
    Third parties