Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics

Can Massachusetts GOP End Its 88 US House Seat Pick-Up Drought in Frank's Open 4th CD?

Bookmark and Share

Bay State Republicans have the second biggest dry spell in the nation and have picked off just 2 of 284 Democratic U.S. House seats since 1944

barneyfrank10.jpgWhile the Republican Party's odds in winning a U.S. House seat in Massachusetts may have increased somewhat with the retirement of Barney Frank in 2012, the Bay State's GOP undeniably has a long historical hurdle to clear to realize that goal.

True, the state's 4th Congressional District map tilted slightly to the right with its new district lines, and an open seat race usually clears the pathway a little wider for the challenging party.

However, Massachusetts Democrats have defended their House seats on a scale bested by only one other state in the nation, and have locked down a near vise-like grip over the congressional seats they have won since World War II.

A Smart Politics review of Massachusetts electoral history finds that not only do Bay State Democrats own a nation-best 82 consecutive victories in U.S. House contests (winning each race since 1996), but also the second best streak in the country in preventing Republican pick-ups at 88 (defending all of its districts since 1994).

The Democratic consecutive victory tally in U.S. House contests began with their sweep of the state's 10 congressional districts in 1996 - picking up the 3rd and 6th CD that they had lost in 1992 and holding their other eight seats.

Democrats then swept all districts across the next seven general election cycles through 2010, plus won special elections in the 9th CD (2001) and 5th CD (2007) to run their current U.S House winning streak to 82 straight seats.

After defeating Democratic incumbents in the 3rd and 6th CDs in 1992, Republicans in Massachusetts have now failed to pick up a Democratic seat in 88 consecutive races dating back to 1994 - the second biggest dry spell in the nation behind only California Republicans.

After Janice Hahn's special election victory over Craig Huey in California's 36th Congressional District in mid-July, Democrats have now successfully held 200 consecutive seats in general and special elections conducted in the Golden State since a special election victory in CA-42 in 1999.

Far behind California (200 seats) and Massachusetts (88) is Oregon in third place where the GOP has failed to pick up a seat in 32 consecutive races in the Beaver State dating back to a special election in the 3rd CD in 1996.

Rhode Island is next on the list with a Republican pick-up drought in 18 straight races since 1992, followed by Maine at 15 (1996), Connecticut at 13 (2004), Iowa at 11 (1998), Oklahoma at five (2002), Utah at five (2002), Kentucky at five (2006), and Vermont at two (2008).

Largest Consecutive Number of Democratic U.S. House Seat Holds by State

Year of last GOP pick-up
Year beginning perfect Democratic holds
Democratic hold streak
Rhode Island
Includes general and special elections. Data compiled by Smart Politics.

In Massachusetts, Democrats have been on an incredible run in holding their own districts dating back to the close of World War II.

Since 1944, Democrats have held 282 of 284 U.S. House seats in general and special elections, or 99.3 percent.

In other words, Republicans have picked off Democratic House seats in Massachusetts at a rate of just 0.7 percent.

By contrast, Democrats have picked off Republican seats in the Bay State at a rate of more than 12 times that amount at 9.0 percent, taking 11 of 122 GOP-controlled U.S. House seats during this 66-year span.

Massachusetts Republicans have seen their 10-seat delegation from 1944 erode to its current level of zero with Democrats picking up seats in 1946, 1948, 1954, 1958, 1972, 1974, 1982, and 1996.

Aside from the loss of the two seats in 1992, the only other instance of a Democratic-held district changing partisan control occurred in 1962 - although it comes with an asterisk.

In that cycle, Massachusetts lost two seats due to reapportionment (from 14 to 12) - one Democratic and one Republican.

Additionally, the 12th CD Democratic incumbent John McCormack ran and won in the new 9th CD while the 9th CD Republican incumbent Keith Hastings ran and won in the new 12th CD.

In short, it was an equal swap for the two parties as districts were renumbered, so the only true black marks on the Democratic resume in defending its home turf over the last 66 years came in 1992 when incumbent Joseph Early was defeated in the 3rd CD by GOPer Peter Blute and incumbent Nicholas Mavroules lost in the 6th CD to Republican Peter Torkildsen.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Covering the Anti-Romney: A Five-Month Week-by-Week Media Analysis of the GOP Field
Next post: Impenetrable: Which States Have the Greatest Democratic Dry Spells in Picking Up US House Seats?

1 Comment

  • As Massachusetts Republican it will be a difficult trend to reverse unless one or more of the following happens.

    1) There is a massive demographic change in the state where Democractic efforts to consolidate power via redistricting will be ineffective. This type of sea change is part of how the Democrats managed to wrest control from the old guard MA Republican house of Cabot-Lodge 1/2 a century ago.

    2) Massachusetts Republicans manage to win local seats and get control of the MA House, where it could solidify its position. Republicans do win state house seats. The MA GOP picked up quite a few seats this last go around. However, one freshman GOP House member just had their district eliminated again via re-districting

    3) The MA GOP totally caves on wedge social issues and argues only on fiscal grounds. The Democratic led House has seen 2 of the last 3 House Speakers go to prison. It is there to be had if the argument is about corruption and waste. I do not see MA voters becoming more socially conservative, however, I do know that there are alot of independent voters who will follow a fiscally conservative message.

    In some ways what happens here in MA hardly resembles Democracy and has many of the same abuses as many 1 party states, be they national or what have you.

    Control of re-destricting by State Houses serves to quell dissent and silence opposition candidates.

    Anyway, interesting post, it is unfortunate to live in a state where your voice doesn't appear to matter.

  • Leave a comment

    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.

    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    Humphrey School Sites
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Foreign affairs
    Race and ethnicity
    Third parties