Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


CNN Rewards Gingrich's Frontrunner Status with Most Speaking Time at DC Debate

Bookmark and Share

Romney cedes the top spot in speaking time at a debate for the first time since the September 12th gathering in Tampa, Florida

newtgingrich10.jpgWith the release of national surveys over the last week by four polling organizations that show Newt Gingrich leading the Republican presidential field (CNN, Quinnipiac, USA Today/Gallup and FOX), CNN took its cue and shined a spotlight on the former House Speaker with a wattage that he had not yet received in any of the previous debates.

While Gingrich was still denied one of the two center stage slots in D.C. Tuesday evening - reserved for Mitt Romney and Herman Cain - he nonetheless was a focal point of the questions posed and directed by moderator Wolf Blitzer.

A Smart Politics content analysis of the Constitution Hall debate finds that, for the first time this debate season, Newt Gingrich notched the most speaking time on the GOP stage.

Gingrich clocked in Tuesday at 12 minutes and 8 seconds, or 16.1 percent of the total speaking time recorded by the eight 2012 Republican White House hopefuls.

While Gingrich's tally was only 36 seconds greater than that of Mitt Romney (11:32, 15.3 percent), it marked the first time the former Massachusetts governor was not afforded the most speaking time since the CNN/Tea Party Express debate in Tampa, Florida on September 12th when he took a distant second to Rick Perry that evening.

And although there was some inequality in the distribution of speaking time Tuesday night, it was not as stark as in several recent debates during which Romney was given twice as much time to answer questions as at least half the candidates on the stage (e.g. New Hampshire #2, Nevada, Michigan).

In the latest CNN moderated debate, Gingrich and Romney were followed by Rick Perry at 10 minutes 55 seconds (14.5 percent), Ron Paul at 9 minutes 59 seconds (13.3 percent), Michele Bachmann at 9 minutes 25 seconds (12.5 percent), Rick Santorum at 7 minutes 59 seconds (10.6 percent), and Jon Huntsman at 7 minutes and 43 seconds (10.2 percent).

The only candidate to get doubled-up on Tuesday was Herman Cain, who vanished with just 5 minutes and 37 seconds of screen time to his name, or 7.5 percent.

Gingirch's rise in the polls has also seen him rise in the amount of speaking time he has received during the debates.

A little more than a month ago, when Gingrich was just about to crack double-digits in national polls, the former House speaker received the least amount of speaking time at the Las Vegas, Nevada debate.

By the time the Michigan debate rolled around on November 9th, Gingrich was polling in the mid-teens and en route to the second most speaking time at the Oakland University gathering.

Of course, with the increased face time, Gingrich has now invited greater scrutiny of his performance, and it remains to be seen how the public reacts to getting a closer look at the latest GOP frontrunner.

Most Speaking Time at D.C.'s Constitutional Hall GOP Presidential Debate

Rank
Candidate
Time
Percent
1
Newt Gingrich
12 min. 08 sec.
16.1
2
Mitt Romney
11 min. 32 sec.
15.3
3
Rick Perry
10 min. 55 sec.
14.5
4
Ron Paul
9 min. 59 sec.
13.3
5
Michele Bachmann
9 min. 25 sec.
12.5
6
Rick Santorum
7 min. 59 sec.
10.6
7
Jon Huntsman
7 min. 43 sec.
10.2
8
Herman Cain
5 min. 37 sec.
7.5
Data compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: The Return of the 11th Commandment?
Next post: Can Democrats Save Their North Dakota U.S. Senate Seat in 2012?

1 Comment


  • Gov. Perry was the commander in chief indeed. He did great. Gov. Perry, unlike other candidates, is running basically on his gigantic record of achievements. Can you imagine Obama running against Perry based on his very poor record? Obama with disastrous record or no record at all, vs Gov. Rick Perry, a giant successful third term governor of a great state, with 13th biggest economy in the world, who has military, governing and legislative experience; plus, Perry is naturally charismatic and powerful leader, and his policies are bold and visionary!! A commander in chief indeed.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting