Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Leaders of the PAC: Which 2012 US Senate Incumbents are Most Reliant on PAC Donations?

Bookmark and Share

Tom Carper, Ben Nelson, and Joe Manchin have received the largest percentage of funds from political committees this cycle

tomcarper10.jpgFor the 2012 election, 25 incumbent U.S. Senators are running out of the 33 Senate races that will be held across the nation.

While it is unclear at this stage which races will turn into the kind of fundraising battle royal of an Al Franken vs. Norm Coleman (Minnesota, 2008), most candidates are willing and eager to accept contributions from political committees.

The 2012 incumbents who have netted the most PAC money overall in the cycle to date are Utah Republican Orrin Hatch ($2.54 million), Nebraska Democrat Ben Nelson ($2.44 million), Michigan Democrat Debbie Stabenow ($2.21 million), and Ohio Democrat Sherrod Brown ($2.02 million).

Only five of the 25 incumbents running for reelection next year have raised less than $1 million from political committees - and two of them were only elected within the last 12 months: Democrat Maria Cantwell of Washington ($53K), independent Bernie Sanders of Vermont ($249K), Republican Dean Heller of Nevada ($598K), Republican Dick Lugar of Indiana ($722K), and West Virginia Democrat Joe Manchin ($732K).

However, an examination of the percentage of PAC money each candidate has secured as a total of all funds raised finds the top of the leader board shifts somewhat.

A quick glance at those most reliant on PAC funds reveals senators who are representing many of the nation's least populated states: Democrat Tom Carper from Delaware at #1 (59.2 percent), Ben Nelson from Nebraska at #2 (55.5 percent), Joe Manchin of West Virginia at #3 (46.4 percent), Republican John Barrasso of Wyoming at #4 (45.6 percent), Republican Olympia Snowe of Maine at #5 (45.3 percent), Republican Orrin Hatch of Utah at #6 (43.0 percent), and Republican Roger Wicker of Mississippi at #7 (42.4 percent).

Those senators representing more populated states appear in the middle and lower end of the list: Democrat Dianne Feinstein of California at #10 (31.3 percent), Democrat Sherrod Brown of Ohio at #16 (25.4 percent), Democrat Bob Casey of Pennsylvania at #17 (24.4 percent), Democrat Bill Nelson of Florida at #18 (22.5 percent), Democrat Bob Menendez of New Jersey at #21 (18.1 percent), and Democrat Kirsten Gillibrand of New York at #23 (13.8 percent).

Carper (59.2 percent) and Ben Nelson (55.5 percent) are the only two 2012 incumbents who have raised over half of their money in the cycle to date from political committees, while Washington's Maria Cantwell (0.8 percent) and Vermont's Bernie Sanders (7.1 percent) are the only two to raise less than 10 percent from such funds.

Overall, PACs constitute an average of 26.4 percent of the funds raised by the 25 U.S. Senators running for reelection next year.

Percent of PAC Money in Cycle to Date Donations to U.S. Senate Incumbents Running for Reelection in 2012

Rank
State
Senator
Party
PAC $
Total
% PAC
1
DE
Tom Carper
DEM
$1,601,101
$2,704,402
59.2
2
NE
Ben Nelson
DEM
$2,442,545
$4,404,513
55.5
3
WV
Joe Manchin
DEM
$732,719
$1,578,006
46.4
4
WY
John Barrasso
GOP
$1,059,335
$2,324,019
45.6
5
ME
Olympia Snowe
GOP
$1,432,621
$3,163,411
45.3
6
UT
Orrin Hatch
GOP
$2,549,753
$5,928,803
43.0
7
MS
Roger Wicker
GOP
$1,176,165
$2,773,599
42.4
8
MD
Ben Cardin
DEM
$1,319,072
$3,566,729
37.0
9
RI
Sheldon Whitehouse
DEM
$1,218,916
$3,760,576
32.4
10
CA
Dianne Feinstein
DEM
$1,241,937
$3,969,081
31.3
11
NV
Dean Heller
GOP
$598,850
$1,973,577
30.3
12
MT
Jon Tester
DEM
$1,516,659
$5,067,155
29.9
13
MI
Debbie Stabenow
DEM
$2,210,014
$7,627,258
29.0
14
MN
Amy Klobuchar
DFL
$1,404,192
$5,076,516
27.7
15
MO
Claire McCaskill
DEM
$1,263,238
$4,783,659
26.4
16
OH
Sherrod Brown
DEM
$2,028,831
$7,998,613
25.4
17
PA
Bob Casey
DEM
$1,488,989
$6,095,956
24.4
18
FL
Bill Nelson
DEM
$1,905,536
$8,476,905
22.5
19
TN
Bob Corker
GOP
$1,480,888
$7,802,049
19.0
20
IN
Richard Lugar
GOP
$722,035
$3,811,058
18.9
21
NJ
Bob Menendez
DEM
$1,800,843
$9,947,611
18.1
22
MA
Scott Brown
GOP
$1,309,139
$7,633,644
17.1
23
NY
Kirsten Gillibrand
DEM
$1,108,982
$8,065,256
13.8
24
VT
Bernie Sanders
IND
$249,066
$3,525,460
7.1
25
WA
Maria Cantwell
DEM
$53,592
$6,366,244
0.8
Total
$33,915,018
$128,424,100
26.4
Note: 'Total' denotes all contributions for the cycle to date excluding loans and transfers from a candidate's other committees. Table compiled by Smart Politics from FEC data through Q3 2011.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: The 'Other' NRA: Media Coverage of National Restaurant Association Skyrockets
Next post: Herman Cain in His Own Words: A Smart Politics Exclusive 'Interview'

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting