Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Punditry Quotes of the Week: Ron Paul Edition

Bookmark and Share

What the media said about Congressman Paul after his Sioux City, Iowa debate performance

ronpaul10.jpgWith two weeks remaining before the caucuses, Iowa Republicans do not yet seem to be listening to the media as to which Republican candidate they are expected to get behind when picking their presidential nominee.

Texas Congressman Ron Paul entered the Republican debate in Sioux City last Thursday surging in Iowa and eclipsing the 20 percent mark for the first time in over 100 public opinion polls conducted during the 2008 and 2012 presidential election cycles.

While Paul generally received satisfactory marks by pundits for his responses in the FOX News debate on domestic policy, he was roundly criticized for his discussion of foreign policy - particularly on questions related to Iran.

Criticized, that is, not simply by some for his policy positions per se but also for how those positions were deemed to hurt his appeal to GOP voters.

The Texas Congressman was judged by many in the media as having missed his chance in the debate to expand his base of support, and thus was seen as emerging from the debate as a much weaker player in the Republican field both nationally as well as in the crucial State of Iowa.

It therefore must have come as some surprise to Paul critic's Monday morning when the first polling numbers were released out of Iowa and the nation with Paul performing better than ever.

Representative Paul now sits at the top of the leader board in the Hawkeye State, with two polls of likely voters showing him in the lead (both conducted in the field after the GOP debate): Paul came in at 23 percent in a new Public Policy Polling survey and 24 percent in a poll by Insider Advantage.

Congressman Paul also recorded 14 percent support in the latest CNN nationwide poll - tied for his best ever national numbers, alongside an August 2011 USA Today/Gallup survey.

The early evidence suggests many pundits got it wrong in Sioux City, as the debate has not yet had the deleterious effect on Paul's campaign that many said it would.

Here are some choice quotes undoubtedly serving as bulletin board material in the Paul camp:

"Ron Paul had a really bad debate." "I thought the big movement was Paul moving down." - David Brooks (New York Times) on NPR (12/16/11) and Newshour (12/16/11)

"I'd say the big loser is Ron Paul... He might as well have gone up there and said the rich aren't paying fair share. It's time to raise taxes. The audience would have been aghast. For Republican primary voters, if you are going to make the case to adjust U.S. foreign policy, there is a way to do it. You may have receptive ears, but using the Moveon.org talking points is not the way to do it." - David Drucker (Roll Call) on Special Report with Bret Baier (12/16/11)

"Losers: Ron Paul: The Texas Congressman spent WAY too much time defending his isolationist foreign policy views -- including his belief that the biggest danger Iran posed to America was if the next president "overreacted". Bachmann effectively bashed Paul -- she said she had "never heard a more dangerous answer" than he gave on Iran -- and the Texas Republican, as is his nature, unhelpfully doubled down on his position." - Chris Cillizza, Washington Post (12/15/11)

"For New Hampshire primary voters who thought a vote for Ron Paul might be a vote for clear, reasoned conservatism, Thursday night's debate in Iowa should have disabused that notion... As a contender for the presidency, he simply is not credible." - Union Leader (NH) Editorial (12/18/11)

"Mr. Paul may have showed the limits to his appeal among Republicans when he argued forcefully against aggressive action to rid Iran of its nuclear capabilities." - Jeff Zeleny and Jim Rutenberg, New York Times (12/16/11)

"The big loser yesterday in my opinion was Ron Paul. I think when he started talking about -- he sounded like -- he sounded like -- who was that guy, the prime minister in England, Chamberlain?" - Vincent Cianci, former Providence Mayor on Hannity (12/16/11)

Of course, with the great volatility at the top of the GOP field this election cycle, it is quite possible the analyses above will eventually ring true and Congressman Paul's support will start to decline.

But it does not appear thus far that the Texan's performance in the Iowa debate will be the trigger for this hypothetical free fall.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: FOX News Moderators Insert Themselves at GOP Debates More Than Any Other Outlet
Next post: Could Bob Kerrey be the Dan Coats of 2012? Interrupted US Senate Tenures Across History

2 Comments


  • In that Paul is the only candidate with a medical degree, one would expect that he could recognize senilety when it stares at him in the mirror.

  • Congressman Paul after his Sioux City, Iowa debate performance media tells the full details of it and its very interesting post.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting