Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Will Michele Bachmann Pull a Phil Gramm in Iowa?

Bookmark and Share

Bachmann is on pace for the worst ever performance at the caucuses by an Iowa Straw Poll winner - a mark currently held by Phil Gramm in 1996

michelebachmann08.jpgWith less than four weeks until the Iowa Caucuses, Michele Bachmann's campaign is still scrambling to find an answer to the question: "How do we win back our supporters?"

Of course, the last several months of the race for the GOP nomination have demonstrated that the support enjoyed by most frontrunners-of-the-moment is rather soft.

As such, the bad news for the Bachmann campaign is that even when she was leading in the Iowa polls last summer, the support was never really hers to lose. The good news, however, is that there is a lot of soft support still waiting to be picked off before January 3rd.

But if the congresswoman fails to do so and does not improve on her current standing in the GOP field, how notable will this be?

Bachmann is currently polling at 8 percent in Iowa, based on an average across the last three non-partisan polls conducted by CNN/Time (7 percent), CBS/NYT (9 percent), and ABC/Washington Post (8 percent) once Herman Cain exited the race.

Admittedly, Ames Straw Poll voters and caucus voters are not wholly overlapping entities.

However, if Bachmann does not build on her support over next month, she will go down in the books as having suffered the largest drop in support from the Straw Poll to the caucuses out of the seven Ames winners dating back to 1979.

To date, the biggest fall from Hawkeye State grace came in the 1996 cycle when Kansas U.S. Senator Bob Dole and Texas U.S. Senator Phil Gramm tied in the 1995 Straw poll with 24.4 percent each.

While Dole went on to win the caucuses (and eventually the nomination), Gramm fell all the way to fifth, notching just 9.3 percent of the vote on Caucus Day.

Gramm ended up losing to not only Dole, but also Pat Buchanan (23.0 percent), Lamar Alexander (17.6 percent), and Steve Forbes (10.1 percent), and beat Alan Keyes for fifth by less than two points.

No other Straw Poll winner has suffered a double digit drop from Ames to the caucuses nor finished worse than second:

· In 1980, George H.W. Bush fell from 36 percent in the Straw Poll to 31.6 percent in the caucuses, but won both.

· In 1988, Pat Robertson fell 9.0 points from his Straw Poll victory (33.6 percent) to the caucuses (24.6 percent) where he finished second behind George H.W. Bush.

· In 2000, George W. Bush improved 9.7 points from his Straw Poll win (31.3 percent) to his victory in the caucuses (41.0 percent).

· In 2008, Mitt Romney dropped 6.4 points from Ames (31.6 percent) to the caucuses (25.2 percent) where he was runner-up to Mike Huckabee.

Representative Bachmann, meanwhile, notched 28.6 percent in the Ames Straw Poll victory she eked out against Congressman Ron Paul last August.

The Minnesota congresswoman is currently polling 20.6 points below that mark at just 8 percent and all the way back in fifth place - well behind frontrunner Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney, and Ron Paul and just behind Rick Perry for fourth.

Perry has averaged 10.3 percent support in the CNN/Time (9 percent), CBS/NYT (11 percent), and ABC/Washington Post (11 percent) polls conducted over the last week.

While it is certainly plausible that Bachmann could catch a little fire in the remaining few weeks in Iowa and reach the mid-teens, it is also probably just as likely that she falls back to sixth place behind fellow conservative warrior Rick Santorum, who is averaging 5.3 percent in the recent polls, but is also making a very aggressive stand in the Hawkeye State - reminding voters at every turn he is the only candidate to visit all 99 counties during the campaign.

Change in Support from Ames to the Caucuses by Straw Poll Winners

Cycle
Straw Poll Winner
% Straw Poll
Caucus Place
% Caucus
Difference
2000
George W. Bush
31.3
1
41.0
+9.7
1996*
Bob Dole
24.4
1
26.0
+1.6
1980
George H.W. Bush
36.0
1
31.6
-4.4
2008
Mitt Romney
31.6
2
25.2
-6.4
1988
Pat Robertson
33.6
2
24.6
-9.0
1996*
Phil Gramm
24.4
5
9.3
-15.1
2012
Michele Bachmann
28.6
5 (polling)
8.0 (polling)
-20.6
Note: Bob Dole and Phil Gramm received the exact same number of votes in the 1995 Iowa Straw Poll.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Is Newt Gingrich Too Old to Beat Barack Obama?
Next post: ABC Grants Romney More than Twice as Much Speaking Time as Ron Paul in Iowa Debate

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting