Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Romney Speaks 8+ Minutes More than Closest Rival at SC Debate

Bookmark and Share

FOX gives the GOP frontrunner 8 minutes and 23 seconds more speaking time than his closest competitor - the largest gap in the debates thus far

mittromney11.jpgWhile the frontrunner for the Republican nomination has fluctuated dramatically during the past several months, one thing that has remained fairly consistent is the relative amount of speaking time Mitt Romney has been afforded by the various news outlets moderating the GOP presidential debates.

Since the Republican field was set after Rick Perry entered the race in August, the former Massachusetts governor has spoken more than any other candidate in nine of the 13 subsequent debates, and second most in the remaining four.

In the first debate since the number of candidates was winnowed to just five after Jon Huntsman suspended his campaign on Monday, little changed on the debate stage.

A Smart Politics study finds that Mitt Romney spoke 8 minutes and 23 seconds longer than any other candidate in Monday's South Carolina debate - the largest gap at the top of the leader board recorded by any candidate across the 13 debates conducted since September.

Romney spoke for 22 minutes and 22 seconds in the FOX News / Wall Street Journal debate, or 31.4 percent of the total candidate speaking time.

Romney was the only candidate to speak more than what would have been an equal distribution of face time of 20.0 percent.

Romney was followed by Rick Santorum at 13 minutes and 59 seconds (19.6 percent), Newt Gingrich at 13:22 (18.8 percent), Ron Paul at 12:01 (16.9 percent), and Rick Perry at 9:26 (13.3 percent).

Total Speaking Time in the FOX / Wall Street Journal South Carolina GOP Presidential Debate

Candidate
Time
Percent
Mitt Romney
22 min. 22 sec.
31.4
Rick Santorum
13 min. 59 sec.
19.6
Newt Gingrich
13 min. 22 sec.
18.8
Ron Paul
12 min. 01 sec.
16.9
Rick Perry
9 min. 26 sec.
13.3
Data compiled by Smart Politics.

A portion of Romney's advantage was due to rebuttals, particularly after being the object of several attacks launched by the field during the first quarter of the debate - with many of these attacks prompted by moderator questions. (Romney has been perennially under attack - though perhaps not always effectively - throughout the previous dozen debates).

What made the third South Carolina debate noteworthy is the gap between Romney's speaking time and that of his closest competitor for the microphone.

The 8 minute and 23 second gap between Romney and Santorum was the largest by Romney - or any candidate - across these last 13 debates.

The previous largest gap took place during in the second New Hampshire debate moderated by Bloomberg and The Washington Post back in mid-October.

During that debate, Romney spoke for 7 minutes and 56 seconds longer (18:12) than the next closest Republican candidate, Rick Perry (10:16).

Romney has also spoken for at least five more minutes than his closest rival on the stage in three other debates: the third New Hampshire debate moderated by ABC News (+7:28 over Santorum), the Michigan debated moderated by CNBC (+5:32 over Gingrich), and the Nevada debate moderated by CNN (+5:12 over Perry).

The remaining four members of the GOP field will have one more chance to seize the stage from Romney before the South Carolina primary this Saturday during Thursday's CNN gathering in Charleston.

Romney Speaking Time Advantage Over Closest Rival in GOP Presidential Debates

Debate
Romney
Closest Rival
Difference
Time Rank
SC 3
22:22
13:59
+8:23
1
NH 2
18:12
10:16
+7:56
1
NH 3
20:23
12:55
+7:28
1
MI
14:51
9:19
+5:32
1
NV
17:22
12:10
+5:12
1
IA 2
17:40
13:11
+4:39
1
NH 4
14:14
10:43
+3:31
1
FL 2
12:01
10:08
+1:53
1
SC 2
8:45
8:12
+0.33
1
DC
11:32
12:08
-0:36
2*
IA 3
13:03
14:45
-1:42
2*
FL 1
10:56
13:48
-2:52
2**
CA
11:49
14:49
-3:00
2**
* Behind Newt Gingrich. ** Behind Rick Perry. Data compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Scott Walker Faces 3rd Shortest Wisconsin Gubernatorial Tenure if Recalled
Next post: Al Franken on Al Franken

1 Comment


  • This bias in favor of Mitt Romney is so obvious, and also misguided. They will regret it if he faces Obama and loses, although it probably will be a close race until the very end. Divide and conquer, the donkeys and elephants both do it, they're simply two sides of the same dirty (very dirty) coin.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting