Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Why is Mitt Romney Feeling Blue? Candidate Necktie Colors at the GOP Debates

Bookmark and Share

Romney has worn a blue tie in 17 of 18 presidential debates; his opponents usually wear red and Gingrich has not worn a blue tie once

mittromney12.jpgWhen candidates are on the campaign trail, such as at a manufacturing facility, they sometimes have the freedom to break out the flannel shirts and roll up their sleeves.

But when taking the stage at a presidential debate, (male) candidates are somewhat limited in their manner of dress - with dark suits and white shirts staples for such proceedings.

Where candidates can make a fashion - or political - statement, is in their choice of necktie.

Previous Smart Politics research has demonstrated that Republican governors are three times as likely to choose a red tie over a blue tie, in keeping with the modern symbol of their political party.

And this year's presidential candidates?

To paraphrase Mark Twain, if clothes make the candidate, then Mitt Romney may be sending out some very telling nonverbal cues.

A Smart Politics analysis of the 19 Republican presidential debates conducted through the CNN debate in Jacksonville Thursday evening finds that while his chief rivals have generally opted for a red tie, Mitt Romney has worn a blue tie in 17 of the 18 debates in which he has participated, or 94 percent of the time.

The only debate in which Romney wore a red tie was the first Florida debate held in Tampa last September.

In every other debate, Romney has proudly flaunted his blue colors - standing apart from the remaining male GOP candidates, who have worn blue ties on just 21 occasions out of 95 debate appearances, or only 22 percent of the time.

Red was by far the most common color sported by the anti-Romney candidates, choosing the hue most associated with the Republican Party 45 times thus far.

Newt Gingrich, who has tried to score points in recent weeks by calling his chief Republican presidential opponent a "Massachusetts moderate," has not yet made the link to the voters that Romney's blue ties might be a signal for a less than conservative presidential administration.

Gingrich is one of just two candidates (along with Herman Cain) never to wear a blue tie in a debate thus far, choosing red on 11 occasions, a red/blue hybrid once, and other colors in his six remaining debates.

The candidate who most frequently wore red ties is the field's most recent dropout, Rick Perry. Perry sported a red tie in 10 of the 13 debates, or 77 percent of the time, while going blue just three times.

Rick Santorum has donned a red tie in 12 debates, a blue tie in six, and a salmon tie in one, with Ron Paul wearing red eight times, blue four times, and a red/blue mix four times.

While they didn't normally wear blue like Romney, the other two candidates frequently caught without red around their necks were Herman Cain and Jon Huntsman.

Cain's yellowish-gold tie was a staple for the former candidate, wearing it in 10 of the 11 debates in which he participated.

Cain even received a compliment from Huntsman in the second Florida debate last September when Huntsman described why he would pick the former Godfather's CEO as his running mate from the pool of candidates on the stage:

"Herman Cain, because of his selection of ties, the fact that -- the fact that we both -- we both apparently agree with the gold standard, wearing the yellow ties here tonight."

Huntsman, meanwhile, was by far the most dynamic - or erratic - dresser when it came to neckties among the Republican candidates.

The former Utah governor was alternately seen wearing blue (x4), red (x2), yellow (x2), pink (x2), and purple (x1) ties during his 11 debate appearances.

Choice of Tie Color by Republican Candidates During the 2012 Presidential Debates

Candidate
Red
Blue
Red/Blue
Other
Mitt Romney
1
17
0
0
Newt Gingrich
11
0
1
6
Rick Santorum
12
6
0
1
Ron Paul
8
4
4
2
Rick Perry
10
3
0
0
Jon Huntsman
2
4
0
5
Herman Cain
1
0
0
10
Tim Pawlenty
0
2
0
1
Gary Johnson
0
2
0
0
Total
45
38
5
25
Note: Table denotes the dominant color in the necktie worn by the candidate. Data compiled by Smart Politics.

During Thursday night's gathering in Jacksonville, the blue-tied Romney had one of his strongest debates, and for the 11th time in the last 14 debates, led the field with the most speaking time on the stage.

Romney spoke for 24 minutes and 18 seconds, or 29.7 percent of the total candidate speaking time.

Romney was followed by the red-tied Rick Santorum at 22 minutes and 18 seconds (27.2 percent), the purple-striped Newt Gingrich at 21:26 (26.2 percent), and the red-tied Ron Paul far behind once again at 13:51 (16.9 percent).

Total Candidate Speaking Time in CNN Florida GOP Presidential Debate

Candidate
Time
Percent
Mitt Romney
24 min. 18 sec.
29.7
Rick Santorum
22 min. 18 sec.
27.2
Newt Gingrich
21 min. 26 sec.
26.2
Ron Paul
13 min. 51 sec.
16.9
Data compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Bachmann Celebrates Reelection Bid Announcement with Second 'Appearance' on Jeopardy!
Next post: Could Heath Shuler or Brad Miller Buck History in North Carolina's Gubernatorial Race?

1 Comment


  • I think he just likes the color blue... but that's just me.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting