Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Kucinich Flirtation with Washington Yields Modest Fundraising Boost from Evergreen State

Bookmark and Share

The State of Washington ranks fifth in large donor contributions (and eighth per capita) to Kucinich's 2012 reelection campaign

denniskucinich10.jpgIt is not yet known whether Ohio Democratic U.S. Representative Dennis Kucinich's six-month flirtation that he might pack up and run for reelection in the State of Washington will damage his chances of returning to D.C. next fall in the state's reconfigured 9th Congressional District.

Kucinich, who represents the 10th CD but was jittery about the Buckeye State's newly drawn congressional district lines, had explored a 2012 run across the country in the Evergreen State - a bold move considering no U.S. Representative has won reelection in back-to-back cycles after moving to a new state in the history of the House.

Kucinich's end of the year FEC filings suggest his Washington dalliance garnered the congressman only modest interest among residents of the state.

A Smart Politics review of itemized individual contributions to Dennis Kucinich's 2012 campaign finds he raised the fifth largest amount of large donor money from Washington in 2011.

Large donor money accounted for only 38 percent of Kucinich's $568K haul from individuals last year - with $411K coming from small donors.

Washington residents contributed $7,855 in itemized funds in 2011 - behind only California ($47,003), Ohio ($17,615), New York ($17,122), and Massachusetts ($9,635).

Two-thirds of this money ($5,265) was raised during the March-to September period wherein Kucinich was considering a run out west.

Two years ago, Kucinich raised just $1,000 in large donor money from Washington during this six-month time frame, and $2,950 for 2009 overall.

When looking at large donor giving per capita, Kucinich's receipts from Washington rank eighth in the nation for 2011 at $116 per 100,000 residents - behind New Hampshire ($326), Washington D.C. ($249), Alaska ($168), Ohio ($152), Massachusetts ($147), California ($126), and Hawaii ($120).

It does not appear that the congressman's Washington exploration has hurt his in-state fundraising thus far.

The $17,615 in large donor money Kucinich has amassed from Ohio residents in 2011 is 18 times the amount he had gathered from his home state at this stage two years ago at the end of 2009 ($950).

Kucinich, now in his eighth term in the House in the Buckeye State's 10th CD, will square off against 15-term incumbent Marcy Kaptur in the 9th CD in the Democratic primary.

Kucinich has raised more than twice as much money as Kaptur to date - $603,433 to $281,358.

Fortunately for Congressman Kucinich, his overall 2011 fundraising levels are up 123 percent over the same period two years ago.

Kaptur's fundraising is likewise up 129 percent from two years ago, but on a much smaller scale than the former two-time presidential candidate.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: O Canada: Ron Paul Excels in Northern Border States
Next post: Will Mitt Romney Win the Battle for the Middle Class?

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting