Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Will New Redistricting Map Bring Minnesota More Competitive US House Races?

Bookmark and Share

History says no: Gopher State elections in redistricting years ending in '2' have been the second least competitive, behind only years ending in '6'

michelebachmann08.jpgWith Minnesota's new congressional and state legislative district maps to be released by a special state court panel on Tuesday afternoon, all eyes will be on how the state's congressional districts have been redrawn - particularly those needing to shed tens of thousands of residents.

At the top of that list is Minnesota's 6th Congressional District - home to the largest population of Minnesotans as well as its biggest national star, former Republican presidential candidate and incumbent Michele Bachmann.

While political observers may be salivating at the thought of how new district lines might bring chaos (and headlines) to what are all too frequently mundane congressional races, history suggests redistricting has not been that magic formula.

A Smart Politics review of Minnesota U.S. House election data finds that contests held during redistricting years are the second least competitive, with only cycles ending in '6' averaging a larger margin of victory.

Smart Politics examined the margin of victory in over 550 Minnesota U.S. House elections dating back to statehood.

Excluded from analysis were the state's five special elections held in 1919, 1929 (x2), 1958, and 1977, plus the 16 at-large races in 1857, 1858, 1860, 1912, and 1932.

The average margin of victory across the 103 contests held during redistricting years over the past century and a half has been 24.5 points.

That margin is higher than the average victory margin in cycles ending in '4' (23.0 points), '8' (23.7 points), and '0' (24.3 points).

Only election cycles ending in '6' were less competitive, coming in with an average victory margin of 27.6 points.

Overall, that means there has essentially been no difference in the closeness of congressional races held in redistricting years (24.5 points) than in non-redistricting years (24.7 points).

Minnesota's U.S. House races in 2010 were unusually competitive compared to most cycles in recent decades.

The average margin of victory across the state's eight districts was 19.3 points, which is the second lowest tally across the last 23 cycles since 1966 - behind only the Republican Revolution of 1994 at 17.0 points.

Unlike the Election of 1994, however, when there was no partisan turnover in the Gopher State, one seat changed hands last cycle when Chip Cravaack upset 18-term DFL incumbent Jim Oberstar.

Overall, the most recent congressional district map produced an average victory margin of 25.8 points across the 40 races held during the 2002-2010 five-cycle span.

The map produced the sixth largest victory margins across the state's 16 maps since statehood, behind 1902-1910 (38.7 points), 1912-1920 (32.8 points), 1972-1980 (32.1 points), 1982-1990 (31.2 points), and 1922-1930 (26.0 points).

As for Congresswoman Bachmann, she has been involved in her fair share of competitive contests.

The three-term U.S. Representative recorded the narrowest margin of victory of any Republican incumbent in the country in 2008 and the fifth narrowest of any GOP incumbent in 2010.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Presidents' Day Special: Small State Blues
Next post: Bachmann Blasts "Liberal Courts" Over "Injustice" and "Biased" New Map

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting