Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Will Rick Santorum Win 20 States?

Bookmark and Share

If he remains in the race, Santorum will end up with the third or fourth most states ever won by a failed presidential candidate

ricksantorum13.jpgWhile there is almost universal agreement that there is no path to 1,144 delegates for Rick Santorum before the Republican convention, the former Pennsylvania U.S. Senator is nonetheless currently on a trail that few (losing) presidential candidates have blazed.

Santorum has already won 11 state contests (counting the Missouri primary), and is poised to win many more should he stay in the race over the next 2+ months.

In fact, Santorum's primary and caucus victory tally may end up shy of only two or three other candidates in history who failed to win their party's nomination.

A Smart Politics review of presidential primary election data finds Rick Santorum is slated to end up with the third or fourth most states ever won by a losing presidential candidate in U.S. history.

Presuming Santorum will ultimately be defeated in his White House bid, he currently sits tied for #6 on the list for the most states carried in a presidential primary cycle by a candidate who did not receive his party's nomination - tied with Mitt Romney during his 2008 campaign.

If Santorum remains in the race through June, he is in a strong position to receive the most votes in the following eight states: Pennsylvania (April 22), North Carolina and West Virginia (May 8), Nebraska (May 15), Arkansas and Kentucky (May 22), Texas (May 29), and South Dakota (June 5).

That would bring Santorum's tally to 19 states and good for #4 all time on the bridesmaid's list - leapfrogging Democrats Ted Kennedy in 1980 and Estes Kefauver in 1952, both of whom netted 12 states.

(Note: Kefauver won the vast majority of primaries that cycle, although only a relatively small number of delegates were chosen through the primary system with less than a third of the states holding such contests).

While Romney will likely win most of the remaining eastern and western states left on the calendar, Santorum does have a puncher's chance in states like Wisconsin (April 3), Indiana (May 8), and Oregon (May 15).

Winning a few of those states would put Santorum in Hillary Clinton territory - the Secretary of State carried 21 states during her 2008 bid.

The only failed presidential candidates who carried more states than Clinton are Ronald Reagan with 23, during his famed 1976 challenge of sitting president Gerald Ford, and Gary Hart, who won more states (26) than Vice-President Walter Mondale (22) during the topsy-turvy 1984 Democratic Party battle.

One difference between Santorum and the Hart-Reagan-Clinton candidacies, however, is that the latter candidates were (to varying degrees) more closely tied to 'establishment support' of their respective parties than is Rick Santorum today vis-à-vis Romney (particularly Clinton, less so Reagan and Hart).

Those candidates also won big population states that yielded them significantly more delegates than those won by Santorum - hence giving their candidacies comparatively more legitimacy during the waning weeks of the primary slog (e.g. Hart won California and Florida, Reagan won New York, Texas, California, and Florida, and Reagan won California and Texas).

And it is ultimately the number of delegates, not the number of states won per se, that will determine the party's nominee. (A previous Smart Politics report found Santorum handily winning the largest number of counties) in the 2012 cycle.

That said, the ebbs and flows in momentum - real or framed by the media - are frequently tied to the winning or losing of the latest states on the calendar, not simply the actual delegate count estimates at that point in time.

As a result, if Santorum believe he can win as many as 40 percent of the state primaries and caucuses this cycle, it should not come as a surprise that he would want and choose to remain in the race until the bitter end.

This is particularly true in light of the fact that Santorum has been able to carry these states on a fraction of the budget of the GOP frontrunner Romney.

And so, if Santorum is ultimately able to win the lion's share of the states outlined above and come close to 20 victories, he will have an impressive enough resume that it is unlikely his decision to remain in the race will tarnish his legacy or potential future electoral ambitions.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Wisconsin Republican Primary Results Mirror Illinois in Modern Era
Next post: Wisconsin Eyes Just Fourth Plurality Winner in GOP Primary Since 1912

4 Comments


  • Great article and I wish others would see this before being so quick to write Santorum off or call for him to get out of the race! He's done an amazing job with limited resources, something the government could learn from! A lot of us still believe in him and are praying for him!

  • Unless a significant enough change happens, Santorum will not get out of second place. And no matter how close second place comes to first, it's still second.

  • Yeah! and look where Hillary is now. I thought every vote counted, what happen to that? Leave Rick alone and let him do his thing. We still don't know who in the crap O'bama is, but he'll get plenty votes from the non-doers in our world. We need to label O'bama the Enabler, because that's what he does best. Go Rick, you're my choice.

  • Huh?

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting