Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


AHIP President Karen Ignagni Talks about Health Care Costs and the "Other 94 Percent"

Bookmark and Share

The president of America's Health Insurance Plans targets the role hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, and technology firms play in the escalating costs of health care

ahiplogo10.jpgKaren Ignagni, President and Chief Executive Officer of America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), was the featured speaker at "Navigating the Affordable Care Act: Opportunities and Challenges," a forum hosted by the University of Minnesota's Humphrey School of Public Affairs Thursday morning.

Ignagni presented her talk as a dialogue addressing the need to achieve high quality of health care and also a cost effective system.

Though issues related to cost definitely took center stage.

In her 40 minute speech, the AHIP president referred to the cost of health care 57 times, compared to just nine comments related to the quality of care that individuals receive.

Ignagni's central point with relation to cost was that, in the speaker's view, the insurance industry has been unfairly signaled out for critique in policy discussions when it comes to the nation's rising costs of heath care, while other key players such as hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, and technology firms have not had their feet held to the fire.

Ignagni insists her industry is trying to reduce the cost of care, and cited government data which shows that even though health plans amount to just six percent of total national health care costs, "We haven't had a dialogue about the other 94 percent."

In reviewing the run-up to the passage of the ACA, Ignagni said while "The health care debate in 2009 shrunk to insurance reform, the issue of cost containment really didn't get attacked the way it needs to get attacked."

Ignagni insisted, "Our rates reflect the underlying costs of what's being charged" and that true cost containment was "left on the cutting room floor" back in 2009.

At an event in which the $64,000 question revolved around the forthcoming Supreme Court ruling on the ACA, Ignagni refused to take the bait and asserted, "Although a lot of hot air is being consumed on cable television, nobody has a clear crystal ball in terms of what the justices are likely to do."

The AHIP president called out the media for its "rush to judgment" and its about-face from certainty that the ACA would be upheld before oral arguments to claims that it will now be ruled unconstitutional.

Ignagni ended her speech by relaying the frustrating attempts to get meaningful cost control measures addressed in Washington, D.C. where the power brokers say, "It's too hard to take on because my cost containment is someone else's revenue reduction. And members of Congress - it's like yelling 'fire' in a crowded room. They run from that type of discussion."

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Romney Strongest in McCain Country in Wisconsin
Next post: Could Romney Become 1st President Whose Party Fails to Win a US House Seat in His Home State?

1 Comment


  • If it reduces health care costs...then this sounds like a good idea. After all, it's supposed to be health care reform, not health insurance reform.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting