Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


AHIP President Karen Ignagni Talks about Health Care Costs and the "Other 94 Percent"

Bookmark and Share

The president of America's Health Insurance Plans targets the role hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, and technology firms play in the escalating costs of health care

ahiplogo10.jpgKaren Ignagni, President and Chief Executive Officer of America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), was the featured speaker at "Navigating the Affordable Care Act: Opportunities and Challenges," a forum hosted by the University of Minnesota's Humphrey School of Public Affairs Thursday morning.

Ignagni presented her talk as a dialogue addressing the need to achieve high quality of health care and also a cost effective system.

Though issues related to cost definitely took center stage.

In her 40 minute speech, the AHIP president referred to the cost of health care 57 times, compared to just nine comments related to the quality of care that individuals receive.

Ignagni's central point with relation to cost was that, in the speaker's view, the insurance industry has been unfairly signaled out for critique in policy discussions when it comes to the nation's rising costs of heath care, while other key players such as hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, and technology firms have not had their feet held to the fire.

Ignagni insists her industry is trying to reduce the cost of care, and cited government data which shows that even though health plans amount to just six percent of total national health care costs, "We haven't had a dialogue about the other 94 percent."

In reviewing the run-up to the passage of the ACA, Ignagni said while "The health care debate in 2009 shrunk to insurance reform, the issue of cost containment really didn't get attacked the way it needs to get attacked."

Ignagni insisted, "Our rates reflect the underlying costs of what's being charged" and that true cost containment was "left on the cutting room floor" back in 2009.

At an event in which the $64,000 question revolved around the forthcoming Supreme Court ruling on the ACA, Ignagni refused to take the bait and asserted, "Although a lot of hot air is being consumed on cable television, nobody has a clear crystal ball in terms of what the justices are likely to do."

The AHIP president called out the media for its "rush to judgment" and its about-face from certainty that the ACA would be upheld before oral arguments to claims that it will now be ruled unconstitutional.

Ignagni ended her speech by relaying the frustrating attempts to get meaningful cost control measures addressed in Washington, D.C. where the power brokers say, "It's too hard to take on because my cost containment is someone else's revenue reduction. And members of Congress - it's like yelling 'fire' in a crowded room. They run from that type of discussion."

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Romney Strongest in McCain Country in Wisconsin
Next post: Could Romney Become 1st President Whose Party Fails to Win a US House Seat in His Home State?

1 Comment


  • If it reduces health care costs...then this sounds like a good idea. After all, it's supposed to be health care reform, not health insurance reform.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Slam Dunk: Will 36 Record Presidential Winning Streaks Continue in 2016?

    Three-dozen states are currently in the midst of their longest Democratic or Republican presidential winning streaks.

    Political Crumbs

    73 Months and Counting

    January's preliminary Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers show Minnesota's unemployment rate of 3.7 percent was once again lower than Wisconsin's 5.0 percent. That marks the 73rd consecutive month in which Minnesota has boasted a lower jobless rate than its neighbor to the east dating back to January 2009 including each of the last 67 months by at least one point. The Gopher State has now edged Wisconsin in the employment border battle for 204 of the last 216 months dating back to February 1997. Wisconsin only managed a lower unemployment rate than Minnesota for the 12 months of 2008 during this 18-year span.


    Two Dakotas, One Voice?

    For each of the last 24 presidential elections since 1920, North and South Dakota have voted in unison - casting their ballots for the same nominee. For 21 of these cycles (including each of the last 12 since 1968) Republicans carried the Dakotas with just three cycles going to the Democrats (1932, 1936, and 1964). This streak stands in contrast to the first few decades after statehood when North and South Dakota supported different nominees in four of the first seven cycles. North Dakota narrowly backed Populist James Weaver in 1892 while South Dakota voted for incumbent Republican Benjamin Harrison. In 1896, it was North Dakota backing GOPer William McKinley while South Dakota supported Democrat William Jennings Bryan by less than 200 votes. North Dakota voted Democratic in 1912 and 1916 supporting Woodrow Wilson while South Dakota cast its Electoral College votes for Progressive Teddy Roosevelt and Republican Charles Hughes respectively.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting