Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Fun Facts in Texas U.S. Senate Primary Election History

Bookmark and Share

Nearly 40 percent of Lone Star State Democratic primaries for U.S. Senate have gone to a runoff since 1916 with the second place candidate winning in more than half of the runoff elections

texasseal10.pngAn open race to fill Texas Republican Kay Bailey Hutchison's seat in the U.S. Senate has led a cavalcade of candidates to fill the ballots in Tuesday's primary election.

A party record nine candidates are squaring off in the Republican primary with four candidates in the Democratic primary.

While Democrats have become quite familiar with runoff elections in senate primaries (when the leader fails to net a majority of the vote), runoffs have been quite unusual for the Republicans.

So will either party have their nominee after all the votes are counted Tuesday evening?

A Smart Politics review of primary data culled from the Texas Almanac finds that the Democratic and Republican parties have never had a runoff election in the same cycle since the primary system was introduced for U.S. Senate races nearly 100 years ago.

Democrats have seen runoffs in nearly 40 percent of the 32 U.S. Senate primaries conducted since 1916 while Republicans have had only two - although holding only about half as many contests.

(Texas state law required that primary elections are mandated only when the size of the party's vote in the previous election reached a certain threshold of the vote. Due to the historical dominance of the Democratic Party in the state until recent decades, the GOP only held five such primaries until the 1960s).

On Tuesday, Texas Lieutenant Governor and Republican frontrunner David Dewhurst is attempting to fend off a runoff election with Ted Cruz by eking out a majority of the vote.

Republicans have only had two runoff elections in Senate races over the last century: in 1964, when George H.W. Bush won 44.1 percent of the vote in a four-candidate field and in 1988, when Wes Gilbreath won 36.7 percent of the vote in a four-candidate race.

Bush then captured the runoff victory over Jack Cox with 62.1 percent but Beau Boulter came back to beat Gilbreath in the 1988 runoff with 60.2 percent - or nearly double the 30.5 percent he received in the first primary.

Democrats, meanwhile, have been forced into runoff contests in 12 of 32 contests since 1916, including five of the last six since 1994.

In seven of these 12 cycles, the top finisher in the first primary failed to win the runoff election:

· In 1916, O.B. Colquitt led incumbent Charles Culberson in the primary, 30.0 percent to 21.9 percent, in a seven-candidate field. Culberson then won 63.4 percent in the runoff.

· In 1928, Earle Mayfield won a plurality 29.7 percent in the first primary over Tom Connally (26.4 percent) and knocked out Culberson in a six-candidate field, but Connally came back to win 55.4 percent of the runoff vote.

· In 1948, Coke Stevenson won 39.7 percent to Lyndon Johnson's 33.7 percent in an 11-candidate field, with Johnson winning a controversial runoff by just 87 votes out of more than 988,000 cast later that summer.

· In 1972, former U.S. Senator Ralph Yarborough won 49.987 percent and missed winning the primary outright by just 537 votes out of 2,065,748 cast. Barefoot Sanders, who tallied 38.1 percent in the first primary, won the nomination with 52.1 percent in the runoff contest.

· In 1984, Kent Hance edged Lloyd Doggett in a six-candidate primary by one-tenth of a percentage point with 31.2 percent. Doggett then won the runoff by a nearly as narrow margin of 0.2 points with 50.1 percent of the head-to-head vote.

· In 1994, Jim Mattox led a four-candidate field with a plurality of 40.5 percent in the primary, but Richard Fisher won 53.6 percent in the runoff to capture the nomination.

· In 2002, Victor Morales led Ron Kirk by 33.2 to 33.1 percent in the primary with Kirk coming back in the runoff to win 59.8 percent of the vote.

On five other occasions, the plurality winner in the Democratic primary also won the runoff contest: in 1922 (Earle Mayfield), 1942 (W. Lee O'Daniel), 1996 (Victor Morales), 2000 (Gene Kelly), and 2006 (Barbara Ann Radnofsky).

Including Tuesday's primary, Democrats have averaged 3.8 candidates in U.S. Senate primaries with just two candidates running unopposed across the 33 contests conducted since 1916 (Morris Shephard in 1918 and Lyndon Johnson in 1960).

Republicans, meanwhile, have run unopposed candidates five times over the last forty years with incumbents John Tower (1972, 1978), Phil Gramm (1990), and Kay Bailey Hutchison (2000, 2006).

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Look to Senate Race, Not Walker Recall for Romney vs Obama Tilt in Wisconsin
Next post: GOP Challengers Close Historical Gap But Fall Short in Texas US House Primaries

1 Comment


  • I,m very worried about SS and low income programs. I have raised 2 grandchildren, 1 that is a totalcare child. what happens to us when elected officials don,t care?

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting