Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Obama vs the Supreme Court: Rhetoric of the 44th President

Bookmark and Share

Obama's critical comments of the Court outweigh favorable comments by more than a 4:1 margin since taking office

barackobama05.jpgA recent Smart Politics report found that since Barack Obama took office, confidence in the U.S. Supreme Court is at its lowest mark across any administration since Gallup began running its confidence in institutions survey during the Nixon administration.

On Monday, President Obama released a statement giving qualified praise to the Court for its high profile ruling on Arizona's controversial immigration policy.

But issuing even a lukewarm statement such as this about a Supreme Court ruling has been a rarity for the president, with the vast majority of his comments about Court decision making taking a very critical tone throughout his administration.

A Smart Politics analysis of presidential statements finds that Barack Obama usually mentions the Supreme Court to discuss his own accomplishments (i.e. appointments), but, when he does mention Court rulings, his critical comments outnumber favorable statements by more than a 4:1 ratio.

Since taking office in January 2009, President Obama has mentioned the Supreme Court 219 times over nearly 150 speeches, statements, and proclamations etc.

The vast majority of these mentions do not address specific Court decisions.

In fact, just 64 mentions addressed recent or long-decided Supreme Court cases, or 29.2 percent.

Instead, when President Obama raises the issue of the Court, he most frequently does so to discuss the two appointments he made to the bench, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.

A total of 95 of the 219 Obama mentions of the Court refer to one or both of these two female justices that Obama appointed to the bench in 2009 and 2010, or 43.4 percent:

"We put two women on the Supreme Court, including the first Latina Justice." (Remarks at a Democratic National Committee Fundraiser in Chicago, Illinois, April 14, 2011)

"And along the way, we've done a few other things like make sure that families aren't going bankrupt because they get sick and making sure that equal pay for equal work is a reality and appointing a couple of women to the Supreme Court because, Lord knows, we need more women on that Court." (Remarks at a Democratic National Committee Fundraiser in New York City, April 27, 2011)

"We made sure that we had two feisty women on the Supreme Court, including the first Latina." (Remarks at a Democratic National Committee Fundraiser in Miami, Florida,
June 13, 2011)

Another 13 Obama references to the Court concerned the retirements of David Souter and John Paul Stevens that led to the Sotomayor and Kagan appointments (5.9 percent) and an additional 10 mentions dealt with the importance of presidential appointments to the Supreme Court generally (4.6 percent).

When President Obama did mention specific Court cases, the majority of the time he was critical of the ruling - with many of these attacks referring to Citizens United.

Of the 64 mentions of the Supreme Court that focused on rulings, 39 dealt with Citizens United, or 61 percent, with the high profile campaign finance case accounting for 91 percent of Obama's critical mentions of the Court.

The most notable objection, of course, was incorporated into his 2010 State of the Union Address:

"With all due deference to separation of powers, last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests, including foreign corporations, to spend without limit in our elections. I don't think American elections should be bankrolled by America's most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people. And I'd urge Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps correct some of these problems." (Address Before a Joint Session of the Congress on the State of the Union, January 27, 2010)

But it wasn't one-and-done for Obama.

The president regularly hammered home his critique of the landmark case over the next two years in radio addresses, in remarks before party leaders, and at fundraisers:

"But this week, the United States Supreme Court handed a huge victory to the special interests and their lobbyists and a powerful blow to our efforts to rein in corporate influence. This ruling strikes at our democracy itself." (The President's Weekly Address, January 23, 2010)

"Recently however, the Supreme Court issued a decision that overturned decades of law and precedent, dealing a huge blow to our efforts to rein in this undue influence." (The President's Weekly Address, May 1, 2010)

"We're going to have to confront the gaping loophole that the Supreme Court recently opened in our campaign finance laws that allows special interests to spend without limit to influence American elections." (Remarks at a Democratic National Committee Meeting, February 6, 2010)

Overall, critical comments outnumbered positive reviews of Supreme Court decision making by more than a 4:1 ratio with only nine of Obama's 64 mentions being favorable to Court rulings (14 percent) - including Monday's statement on the Arizona immigration case.

Three of these positive mentions dealt with Roe vs. Wade on the anniversary of the landmark decision with three others on civil rights cases such as Brown vs. Board of Education.

Another 12 mentions by the president on Court rulings were neutral with regard to the decision reached in the case.

Is Obama's generally negative portrayal of the Court contributing to the low public confidence in the institution?

Consider this: at a DCCC dinner in New York City two years ago, the president snidely took a veiled shot at his political opponents on the bench:

"We have some folks on the Supreme Court who believe in the Constitution." (Remarks at a Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Dinner in New York City, May 13, 2010)

President Obama Supreme Court Mentions by Topic, 2009-Present

Topic
#
%
Sotomayor / Kagan
95
43.4
Citizens United
39
17.8
Souter / Stevens retirements
13
5.9
Justices (other)
10
4.6
Appointments (general)
10
4.6
Health care
9
4.1
Terror suspects
5
2.3
Civil rights
5
2.3
Japanese internment
3
1.4
Roe vs. Wade
3
1.4
Women - fair pay
3
1.4
Energy Independence and Security Act
2
0.9
EPA
2
0.9
Arts
1
0.5
Authorization for use of Military Force
1
0.5
Homecare
1
0.5
LGBT
1
0.5
Native Americans
1
0.5
Unions
1
0.5
Immigration
1
0.5
Other
13
5.9
Note: Compiled through June 25, 2012. Table compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Will Confidence in Supreme Court Erode or Rebound After Obamacare Decision?
Next post: Oklahoma GOP Poised to Run Table in US House Races for Just 3rd Time Since Statehood

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

No Free Passes: States With 2 Major Party Candidates in Every US House Race

Indiana has now placed candidates from both major parties on the ballot in a nation-best 189 consecutive U.S. House races, with New Hampshire, Minnesota, Idaho, and Montana also north of 100 in a row.

Political Crumbs

Gubernatorial Highs and Lows

Two sitting governors currently hold the record for the highest gubernatorial vote ever received in their respective states by a non-incumbent: Republican Matt Mead of Wyoming (65.7 percent in 2010) and outgoing GOPer Dave Heineman of Nebraska (73.4 percent in 2006). Republican Gary Herbert of Utah had not previously won a gubernatorial contest when he notched a state record 64.1 percent for his first victory in 2010, but was an incumbent at the time after ascending to the position in 2009 after the early departure of Jon Huntsman. Meanwhile, two sitting governors hold the record in their states for the lowest mark ever recorded by a winning gubernatorial candidate (incumbent or otherwise): independent-turned-Democrat Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island (36.1 percent in 2010) and Democrat Terry McAuliffe of Virginia (47.8 percent in 2013).


An Idaho Six Pack

Two-term Idaho Republican Governor Butch Otter only polled at 39 percent in a recent PPP survey of the state's 2014 race - just four points ahead of Democratic businessman A.J. Balukoff. Otter's low numbers reflect his own struggles as a candidate (witness his weak primary win against State Senator Russ Fulcher) combined with the opportunity for disgruntled Idahoans to cast their votes for one of four third party and independent candidates, who collectively received the support of 12 percent of likely voters: Libertarian John Bujak, the Constitution Party's Steve Pankey, and independents Jill Humble and Pro-Life (aka Marvin Richardson). The six candidate options in a gubernatorial race sets an all-time record in the Gem State across the 46 elections conducted since statehood. The previous high water mark of five candidates was reached in seven previous cycles: 1902, 1904, 1908, 1912, 1914, 1966, and 2010.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting