Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Will Confidence in Supreme Court Erode or Rebound After Obamacare Decision?

Bookmark and Share

The U.S. Supreme Court's net confidence rating during Barack Obama's presidency is at an all-time low since Gallup's measurement began in the early 1970s

supremecourtseal10.pngThe immediate impact of the Supreme Court's much anticipated ruling on Obamacare in the coming days will be seen in various responses across governmental institutions such as implementation effects at the state level, possible new congressional legislative action, and carefully crafted rhetoric from the president - trying to ensure his response both protects his legacy as well as shields his reeelection campaign from the ruling, no matter how the Court comes down.

There may also be a longer-term impact on the Court itself from the ruling, as public attitudes are (re)shaped in light of this high profile case.

A decision that strikes down most of Obamacare may invigorate trust in the nation's Court among conservative Americans, but may reduce confidence among liberals who would undoubtedly view the institution as becoming too politicized.

What will be the net effect?

Despite existing skepticism about the Court today, there is plenty of room for confidence to sink further in the public's eyes - which has been the trend in recent years.

A Smart Politics review of Gallup institutions data over the last five decades finds that while America's net confidence in the U.S. Supreme Court has fluctuated up and down at the margins across the last seven presidential administrations, it has sunk to its lowest level during the Obama years.

Gallup has conducted its confidence in U.S. institutions survey across most of the last 40 years since 1973. The survey asks if the respondent has a "great deal," "quite a lot," "some," or "very little" confidence in several governmental and non-governmental institutions. The survey also records the volunteered response "none."

Public attitudes, of course, frequently change up and down a few points each year, so Smart Politics tabulated the "net confidence" scores for the Supreme Court across presidential administrations to give snapshots across different political periods over the last five decades.

The "net confidence" score is tabulated as the sum of the "great deal" and "quite a lot" responses minus the sum of "very little" and "none."

The Court, which used to enjoy fairly healthy ratings on this scale, has now seen its positive scores dip below 40 percent and its net confidence rating fall below +20 points for the first time across a presidential administration.

Since Obama took office in 2009, an average of only 37.3 percent of Americans have expressed a "great deal" or "quite a lot" of confidence in the Court with 19.6 percent stating they had "very little" or "none" for a net score of +18.

That is the lowest net score for the Court compared to its various incarnations which presided during the administrations of Richard Nixon (+28), Gerald Ford (+32), Jimmy Carter (+26), Ronald Reagan (+38), George H.W. Bush (+29), Bill Clinton (+31), and George W. Bush (+26).

The lowest yearly scores for the Supreme Court were recorded in 2007 and 2008 - the last two years of the Bush administration - with net confidence ratings of just +9 and +14 points respectively.

However, scores for the Court were generally healthy during Bush's first term, even in the first few years after the institution's controversial Bush vs. Gore ruling in December 2000, thus yielding a +26 net confidence score average across the eight-year period when Bush was president.

Of course, the Supreme Court is not the only governmental institution that has taken a beating in public opinion polls in recent years.

For example, net confidence data for the U.S. Congress dropped across every presidential administration from Richard Nixon (+28), to Gerald Ford (+21), to Jimmy Carter (+16), to Ronald Reagan (+12), to George H.W. Bush (-2), to Bill Clinton (-6), before stabilizing again during the George W. Bush years (-5).

However, confidence in Congress while Bush was in office was much higher during split or Republican control of the two chambers (2001-2006) than when Democrats took control of both in 2007.

From 2001 to 2006, Congress had a net approval of +2 points with an average of 26 percent of the country expressing a "great deal" or "quite a lot" of confidence and 24 percent expressing "very little" or "none." Another 49 percent stated they had "some" confidence.

After Democrats became the majority party in the House and Senate in 2007, the institution's positive numbers dropped in half to just 13 percent while its negatives nearly doubled to 41 percent, for a net confidence rating of -28 during the last two years while Bush governed in the White House.

The election of Barack Obama and the resulting unified executive and legislative Democratic control in D.C. did not help Congress' numbers, with the legislative branch mustering only a -30 net confidence score across 2009 and 2010.

Those scores fell even further when split control returned to the legislative branch after the GOP won back the House in 2010: at -38 points across 2011 and 2012.

Like the Supreme Court and Congress, the presidency is also mired in low ratings.

Since data was consistently culled by Gallup 1991, the average net confidence scores have fallen across administrations from +40 for George H.W. Bush, +22 for Clinton, +14 for George W. Bush, and just +7 for Obama.

But not all governmental institutions have seen a drop in confidence during the Obama years.

Confidence in the U.S. military is currently at an all-time high, with a +73 net rating since 2009. An average of 78 percent of Americans have stated they have a "great deal" or "quite a lot" of confidence in the military since Obama took office with only 5 percent expressing "very little" or "none."

That is even higher than the robust +67 net confidence rating the military enjoyed during the George W. Bush presidency (74 percent "great deal" + "quite a lot" and 7 percent "very little" + "none").

At the local level, confidence in the police is also currently right at its 20-year average since Gallup added that institution to its battery of questions in 1993.

The Supreme Court ruling on the constitutionality of Obamacare is expected to be handed down this week.

The next Gallup confidence in institutions survey, however, will likely not be conducted until next summer as its 2012 data was recently released this month.

Net Confidence Scores Across Three Branches of Government by Administration

Administration
Supreme Court
Presidency
Congress
Richard Nixon
28
N/A
28
Gerald Ford
32
36
21
Jimmy Carter
26
N/A
16
Ronald Reagan
38
N/A
12
George H.W. Bush
29
40
-2
Bill Clinton
31
22
-6
George W. Bush
26
14
-5
Barack Obama
18
7
-34
Net confidence scores tabulated by Smart Politics from Gallup confidence in institutions survey data.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Obama Cabinet Turnover Rate Remains Historically Low (So Far)
Next post: Obama vs the Supreme Court: Rhetoric of the 44th President

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting