Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


No Bachmann Fatigue: Fundraising Up a Quarter Million from Two Years Ago

Bookmark and Share

Despite a failed presidential bid and risk of overexposure, the Minnesota Congresswoman raises 15 percent more funds in Q2 2012 than she did in Q2 2010 during her record-breaking campaign

michelebachmann07.jpgIt's been a wild two-year stretch for Minnesota U.S. Representative Michele Bachmann: raising a record $13+ million en route to winning her third term from the state's 6th CD in 2010, launching a 6-month presidential campaign that peaked in August 2011 but lost ground quickly thereafter, picking up the pieces after exiting the race to run for a fourth term in the House, and driving off her well-funded 2010 challenger Tarryl Clark into the state's 8th CD.

As Bachmann faded from the national limelight in early January after her disappointing sixth place finish in the Iowa caucuses, speculation about her 2012 plans were soon put to rest later in the month when she announced she would seek a fourth term in November, running on familiar campaign promises to try to repeal Obamacare and reduce the ballooning national debt.

One question that lingered in her return to congressional campaigning was whether Bachmann - one of the few nationally known members of the chamber - could continue to leverage the kind of mammoth support from across the country that she had in previous cycles.

Would supporters return to Bachmann's camp after a disappointing presidential campaign, or had they grown bored or weary of her message and moved on to a new Tea Party figure?

The congresswoman's recently filed FEC fundraising report answers that question quite clearly.

FEC filings for the second quarter of 2012 reestablish Bachmann as one of the elite and most adept fundraisers in the U.S. House.

After a lukewarm (by her standards) $579,149 raised in Q1 of this year as she returned to campaigning for her seat, Representative Bachmann more than tripled that amount from April to June with a haul of $1,865,429.

That is good for second best among all U.S. Representatives running for reelection, behind only Allen West of Florida with $2.2 million.

Bachmann also eclipsed her Q2 2010 fundraising total ($1,616,015) by nearly a quarter of a million dollars ($249,414), or an increase of 15 percent.

Overall, Bachmann's last quarter was the fourth best of her congressional career, and the seventh time she has raised more than $1 million while running for the House:

· Q3 2010 = $5,532,000
· Q4 2010 = $3,881,903
· Q2 2011 = $1,920,799
· Q2 2012 = $1,865,429
· Q1 2011 = $1,717,765
· Q2 2010 = $1,616,015
· Q4 2008 = $1,073,462

While her new haul bests her previous second quarter returns from 2006, 2008, and 2010, the three-term U.S. Representative has not quite returned to the pace she was at one year ago before announcing her presidential candidacy.

In Q2 2011, Bachmann raised $1,920,799 - or $55,370 more than Q2 2012.

The congresswoman's new numbers continue a long-established pattern in her fundraising strategy: receiving almost no money from PACs (just 1.8 percent this quarter) and nearly two-thirds from small donors (64.2 percent).

Bachmann's DFL opponent, entrepreneur Jim Graves, raised $262,925 over the last three months, but is expected to inject his own personal wealth into his campaign.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Broadcast Media in Love with Republican Governors in 2012
Next post: VP Hype Began Several Years Ago for 2012's Rumored Frontrunners

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting