Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Changing Tides? GOP Eyes Rare Majority Control of Upper Midwest Senate Delegation

Bookmark and Share

After November, Democrats in the five-state Upper Midwest region could control less than half of the 10 U.S. Senate seats for only the 4th time in 50 Years

tommythompson10.jpgWhile there is currently a wide consensus among D.C. prognosticators that Minnesota DFLer Amy Klobuchar will win reelection to a second term to the U.S. Senate this November, the Upper Midwest's other two contests - in North Dakota and Wisconsin - do not look as rosy for the Democratic Party.

Democrats are trying to hold each seat in the Badger and Peace Garden States with both contests hovering between true toss-ups and a slight GOP lean.

In Wisconsin, Congresswoman Tammy Baldwin has been charged with holding Herb Kohl's seat against the favored former four-term Republican Governor Tommy Thompson.

The seat has been in Democratic hands since a special election in 1957 after the death of the infamous GOPer Joe McCarthy.

In North Dakota, former state Attorney General Heidi Heitkamp will attempt to keep a Democratic hold on retiring Kent Conrad's seat in a fierce battle with one-term GOP U.S. Representative Rick Berg.

Democrats have won this seat across 10 contests since the Election of 1960 after the death of the iconic Wild Bill Langer.

If Republicans should pick up both seats, it would give the GOP a rare advantage over the Democrats in the region.

A Smart Politics analysis finds that if Democrats lose two Upper Midwestern U.S. Senate seats this November it will be the first time since 1984 and just the fourth time in 50 years that the Party emerges from a general election with less than half of the five-state region's 10 seats.

The last time Republicans held a majority of the 10 U.S. Senate seats in Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin was after the 1984 cycle with the lopsided reelection of Ronald Reagan at the top of the ticket.

Democrats actually picked up one seat that cycle as Tom Harkin won the first of his five terms by defeating one-term GOP incumbent Roger Jepsen.

The only other cycles in which Democrats failed to hold at least half of the region's seats over the past half-century came after the preceding 1980 and 1982 cycles, in which the Democratic Party came out of Election Day controlling just two U.S. Senate seats from the region.

In 1980, Republicans picked up seats in Iowa (with Chuck Grassley defeating one-term Democratic incumbent John Culver), South Dakota (with James Abdnor defeating three-term Democratic incumbent George McGovern), and Wisconsin (with Bob Kasten beating three-term Democratic incumbent Gaylord Nelson) to break a 5-5 seat tie with an 8-2 advantage.

That marked the first time since the Election of 1960 in which Republicans were able to secure a majority of the seats in the region.

During the last 50 years since the 1962 cycle, Democrats have been victorious in nearly two-thirds of all general and special U.S. Senate elections in the Upper Midwest, winning 56 contests (64 percent) and losing just 31.

That represents a significant change from the previous half-century.

From the first popular vote election for the office in the region in 1912 through 1960, Democrats won less than one-fifth of U.S. Senate elections, capturing just 18 of 94 seats (19 percent) with Republicans winning 68 (72 percent) and third parties victorious in the remaining eight (9 percent).

Upper Midwestern U.S. Senate Seats Won by Party by Half-Century

1912-1960
Democrat
Republican
Other
Iowa
6
14
0
Minnesota
4
11
5
North Dakota
2
16
1
South Dakota
3
14
0
Wisconsin
3
13
2
Total
18
68
8
1962-2010
Democrat
Republican
Other
Iowa
8
9
0
Minnesota
10
7
0
North Dakota
13
5
0
South Dakota
10
7
0
Wisconsin
14
3
0
Total
55
31
0
Data compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: RNC: No Rick Scott, No Problem
Next post: Is Connecticut a Battleground State?

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Plurality-Winning Governors Elected At Century-Long High Water Mark

The rate of gubernatorial candidates elected without the support of a majority of voters is at its highest level since the 1910s.

Political Crumbs

Seeing Red

Congressman Nick Rahall's failed bid for a 20th term in West Virginia this cycle, combined with a narrow loss by Nick Casey to Alex Mooney in Shelley Moore Capito's open seat, means that West Virginia Democrats will be shut out of the state's U.S. House delegation for the first time in over 90 years. The Republican sweep by two-term incumbent David McKinley in the 1st CD, Mooney in the 2nd, and Evan Jenkins over Rahall in the 3rd marks the first time the GOP has held all seats in the chamber from West Virginia since the Election of 1920. During the 67th Congress (1921-1923) all six seats from the state were controlled by the GOP. Since the Election of 1922, Democrats have won 76 percent of all U.S. House elections in the Mountain State - capturing 172 seats compared to 54 for the GOP.


Home Field Advantage?

When the 114th Congress convenes in a few days, Maine will be represented by one home-grown U.S. Representative: Waterville-born Republican Bruce Poliquin. With the departure of Millinocket-born Mike Michaud, who launched a failed gubernatorial bid, the Pine Tree State was poised to send a House delegation to D.C. without any Maine-born members for the first time since 1821. Three-term U.S. Rep. Chellie Pingree (born in Minnesota) coasted to reelection as expected, however Poliquin edged Kentucky-born Emily Cain by 5.3 points to keep the streak alive. Since 1876, a total of 208 of the 222 candidates elected to the nation's lower legislative chamber from the state have been born in Maine, or 94 percent.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting