Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Swing States, Battleground States, or Purple States?

Bookmark and Share

What is the preferred nomenclature in the broadcast media when discussing the competitive states that are up for grabs in the 2012 presidential election?

northcarolinaseal10.jpgNorth Carolina. Virginia. Florida. Ohio. Wisconsin.

Everyone following the 2012 presidential race knows these are some of the key states without a runaway frontrunner that both Mitt Romney and Barack Obama would like to carry to help ensure a White House win this November.

But how do journalists talk about these important states?

And what terms do they prefer to use in their coverage?

A Smart Politics review of broadcast media transcripts of ABC, CBS, CNN, FOX, MSNBC, NBC, and NPR from January through July 2012 finds that "swing state" is narrowly the preferred term across the medium to describe the hotly contested presidential states this cycle with "battleground state" a close second and "purple state" and "toss-up state" trailing far behind.

Overall, the term "swing state" has been used in 1,154 broadcast reports on the 2012 presidential race this year - a slight preference to "battleground state" which was utilized in 1,092 reports.

"Swing state" was the term of choice for five of the networks under analysis: CBS, FOX, MSNBC, NBC, and NPR.

"Battleground state," meanwhile, was used more frequently by CNN and ABC.

MSNBC preferred "swing state" at a 1.8 to 1 ratio over battleground state with NPR at 1.7 to 1, CBS at 1.4 to 1, and FOX and NBC at 1.2 to 1.

ABC preferred "battleground state" over "swing state" by a 2.5 to 1 ratio with CNN doing so at a 1.3 to 1 ratio.

The broadcast media has used "swing state" and "battleground state" in campaign reporting for several decades now.

For example, during ABC News' election night coverage of Ronald Reagan versus Jimmy Carter in November 1980, correspondent Sander Vanocur reported:

"Connecticut may also provide some clues to how Catholic, blue-collar workers have voted. The state has the third largest percentage of Catholic voters in the country, and that blue-collar vote is crucial in a battleground state like Ohio, which Carter won in 1976 by only 11,000 votes." (November 4, 1980)

In the 1986 midterms, ABC's Sam Donaldson analyzed President Reagan's midterm congressional losses:

"But in 11 of the 15 states the voters rejected the President's candidate and in the six critical swing states decided 51 to 49 or less, the Republicans lost all six." (November 5, 1986)

But for those who aren't hip to swing, or find the warlike metaphor 'battleground' a bit overdramatic, there are two less popular alternatives that the media sometimes dishes out: "purple state" and "toss-up state."

"Purple state" has appeared in 46 reports by the broadcast media so far this year.

For example, MSNBC host Melissa Harris-Perry spoke of the strategy behind Barack Obama's travel schedule as follows:

"That`s how President Obama spent Thursday and Friday of this week, road tripping across the Rust Belt. He was trying to convince the perennial purple states of Ohio and Pennsylvania to wear a blue dress to the big dance come November." - July 8, 2012

And CNN's Dana Bash attempted to explain Wisconsin's schizophrenic electorate by supporting both Republican Governor Scott Walker and the Democratic president:

"President Obama is pretty far ahead of Mitt Romney, 51 percent to 44 percent. So why the discrepancy? I think first answer to that question is this is historically a purple state, Wisconsin. But in the presidential races, it has gone Democratic, as you and I were talking about yesterday, since Ronald Reagan, since 1984."

When it comes to color schemes, the broadcast media is much more likely to speak of blue and red states than purple, even though purples states determine election outcomes.

"Red state" was utilized in 219 broadcast media reports this year with "blue state" mentioned in 200 - both more than four times as frequently as "purple state."

This is partially explained by the fact that purple state is a relatively recent term in political news coverage - coined some time after the media settled on blue and red as code for Democratic and Republican states more than a decade ago.

One of the early uses of "purple state" came during the 2004 presidential election.

In an Associated Press report from the early stages of the Democratic primaries, Frank Costanzo, director of Howard Dean's Arizona campaign spoke of the color status of the Grand Canyon State:

"I don't think it's a red or blue state. I think it's a purple state." (February 2, 2004)

An early broadcast use of "purple state" took place on NBC later that month when Katie Couric examined one of the grand prizes of the Electoral College vote - Florida:

"Everybody is talking about how key Florida is. Terry McCullough is saying it's clearly the number one prize. Republican strategists are describing it as ground zero. In this increasingly polarized country with blue states and red states, Florida really is a purple state, right?" (February 23, 2004)

For those seeking a more straight-forward approach to their news coverage, there is always the term "toss-up," although it was utilized in just 29 reports thus far in 2012.

"Republicans have to win that county to win Ohio. That gives you a sense of what the state looks like. How important is it? Let's go to the electoral map. It is right now one of our toss-up states." - Jon King, CNN, June 14, 2012

And on NPR:

"President Obama's announcement this week that he now supports gay marriage has sent political pundits into a frenzy of analysis and pontification. One key question: Does the president's decision help or hurt him with core democratic constituencies, especially African-Americans? In the election year toss-up state of North Carolina, for instance, black preachers led the charge for the recent amendment banning gay marriage." - Audie Cornish, May 11, 2012

But whatever term is used to describe these handful of highly competitive states, one thing is for certain - since they are of paramount importance to the candidates, a lot of green will be flowing into them, in the form of ad money across their airwaves.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Texas GOP Senate Runoff Has 2nd Lowest Decline in Turnout from Primary Since 1950
Next post: Will the Real Battleground States Please Stand Up?

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Who Has Won the Most Votes in US Senate Electoral History?

Only three of the Top 10 and nine of the Top 50 vote-getters of all time are currently serving in the chamber.

Political Crumbs

Six for Thirteen

Collin Peterson remarked last month that he is leaning to run for reelection to Minnesota's 7th Congressional District in 2016. If he does and is victorious, he will creep even closer to the top of the list of the longest-serving U.S. Representatives in Minnesota history. The DFL congressman is only the sixth Minnesotan to win at least 13 terms to the U.S. House of the 135 elected to the chamber in state history. Peterson trails 18-term DFLer Jim Oberstar (1975-2011), 16-term Republicans Harold Knutson (1917-1949) and August Andresen (1925-1933; 1935-1958), and 14-term DFLers Martin Sabo (1979-2007) and John Blatnik (1947-1974). Andresen died in office, Sabo and Blatnik retired, and Knutson and Oberstar were defeated at the ballot box in 1948 and 2010 respectively. At 70 years, 7 months, 11 days through Monday, Peterson is currently the ninth oldest Gopher State U.S. Representative in history. DFLer Rick Nolan of the 8th CD is the seventh oldest at 71 years, 1 month, 23 days.


Seeing Red

Congressman Nick Rahall's failed bid for a 20th term in West Virginia this cycle, combined with a narrow loss by Nick Casey to Alex Mooney in Shelley Moore Capito's open seat, means that West Virginia Democrats will be shut out of the state's U.S. House delegation for the first time in over 90 years. The Republican sweep by two-term incumbent David McKinley in the 1st CD, Mooney in the 2nd, and Evan Jenkins over Rahall in the 3rd marks the first time the GOP has held all seats in the chamber from West Virginia since the Election of 1920. During the 67th Congress (1921-1923) all six seats from the state were controlled by the GOP. Since the Election of 1922, Democrats have won 76 percent of all U.S. House elections in the Mountain State - capturing 172 seats compared to 54 for the GOP.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting