Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Will the Real Battleground States Please Stand Up?

Bookmark and Share

An analysis of major media outlets' election projection maps finds few can agree on a definitive list of toss-up states in the 2012 presidential race

floridaseal10.jpgA recent Smart Politics report documented how the broadcast media can't always agree on what to call the handful of competitive states in the 2012 presidential election - from "swing states," to "battleground states," to "purple states," to "toss-up states."

Nor are the nation's biggest media outlets in agreement when it comes to deciding on which states should be tagged with these labels.

In fact, they range from as few as three states to as many as 16.

A Smart Politics review of the 2012 electoral projection maps released by 12 major media outlets finds they yield 10 different lists designating the most competitive states to watch this cycle (e.g. battleground / swing / purple / toss-up).

The 12 news outlets under analysis for this report are ABC, CNN, Huffington Post, MSNBC, National Journal, New York Times, PBS, POLITICO, Real Clear Politics, USA Today, Wall Street Journal, and Washington Post.

Data from their electoral projection maps was harvested on August 2nd.

The number of competitive states deemed "toss-ups" ranged from a low of just three at the Huffington Post (Florida, North Carolina, and Virginia) to a high of 16 at National Journal (Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Wisconsin).

USA Today and the Wall Street Journal listed 12 states with POLITICO at 10, MSNBC at nine, ABC, New York Times, Real Clear Politics, and Washington Post at eight, and CNN and PBS at seven.

The number of electoral votes considered up for grabs peaked at 193 with National Journal followed by 148 at USA Today, 147 at the Wall Street Journal, 126 at POLITICO, 110 at MSNBC, 100 at ABC and Real Clear Politics, 95 at the New York Times and Washington Post, 85 at CNN and PBS, and 57 at the Huffington Post.

Only two pairs of media outlets concurred on which states should be considered toss-ups at this stage of the campaign:

· CNN and PBS agreed on seven states: Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, Ohio, and Virginia.

· ABC and Real Clear Politics were in agreement on eight states: Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, and Virginia.

Toss-Up States by Media Outlet in 2012 Presidential Electoral Projection Maps

State
ABC
CNN
Huff Post
MSNBC
Nat'l J
NYT
PBS
Politico
RCP
USA Today
Wash Post
WSJ
AZ
X
X
CO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
FL
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
IA
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
IN
X
MI
X
X
X
X
MN
X
MO
X
X
NC
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
NH
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
NM
X
X
NV
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
OH
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PA
X
X
VA
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
WI
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
EC Votes
100
85
57
110
193
95
85
126
100
148
95
147
# States
8
7
3
9
16
8
7
10
8
12
8
12
Table compiled by Smart Politics.

Only two states appeared on the lists of each of the dozen media outlets under analysis: Florida and Virginia.

In 2008, Florida was the fifth most narrowly decided contest (+2.8 points for Obama) behind Missouri, North Carolina, Indiana, and Montana while Virginia was eighth (+6.3 points for Obama).

Another five states were listed by 11 outlets: Colorado, Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, and Ohio. Huffington Post opted to rate each under its "Leans Obama" category instead.

After this group came North Carolina which appeared on eight lists, followed by Wisconsin at seven, Michigan at four, Arizona, Missouri, New Mexico, and Pennsylvania at two, and Indiana and Minnesota at one.

Michigan was listed by National Journal, POLITICO, USA Today and the Wall Street Journal.

Arizona and Missouri made the cut at National Journal and the Wall Street Journal while New Mexico and Pennsylvania did so at National Journal and USA Today.

National Journal was the only outlet under analysis to designate Indiana and Minnesota as battlegrounds in 2012.

Most Commonly Listed 2012 Presidential Battleground States Across 12 Media Outlets

State
Total
Florida
12
Virginia
12
Colorado
11
Iowa
11
Nevada
11
New Hampshire
11
Ohio
11
North Carolina
8
Wisconsin
7
Michigan
4
Arizona
2
Missouri
2
New Mexico
2
Pennsylvania
2
Indiana
1
Minnesota
1
Note: Outlets under analysis are ABC, CNN, Huffington Post, MSNBC, National Journal, PBS, POLITICO, Real Clear Politics, USA Today, Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal. Table compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Swing States, Battleground States, or Purple States?
Next post: Missouri GOP US Senate Barnburner Poised for Closest Primary Finish in 56 Years

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Which States Own the Best Track Record in Backing Eventual GOP Presidential Nominees?

Nine states (each with primaries) have an unblemished record in voting for the eventual Republican nominee since 1976 - and not all host contests on the back end of the calendar.

Political Crumbs

Evolving?

When Scott Walker "punted" back in February after being asked if he was comfortable with the idea of evolution he added, "That's a question a politician shouldn't be involved in one way or the other." However, it may very well be a question that is asked at one of the upcoming GOP debates this year. In South Carolina during the first GOP debate in 2012, FOX News' Juan Williams asked Tim Pawlenty, "Do you equate the teaching of creationism with the teaching of evolution as the basis for what should be taught for our nation's schools?" Pawlenty replied, "There should be room in the curriculum for study of intelligent design" but that it was up to the local school districts if it should be in a science class or comparative theory class. At the fourth Republican debate held in California, Jon Huntsman addressed the GOP becoming "anti-science" thusly: "Listen, when you make comments that fly in the face of what 98 out of 100 climate scientists have said, when you call into question the science of evolution, all I'm saying is that, in order for the Republican Party to win, we can't run from science. We can't run from mainstream conservative philosophy."


73 Months and Counting

January's preliminary Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers show Minnesota's unemployment rate of 3.7 percent was once again lower than Wisconsin's 5.0 percent. That marks the 73rd consecutive month in which Minnesota has boasted a lower jobless rate than its neighbor to the east dating back to January 2009 including each of the last 67 months by at least one point. The Gopher State has now edged Wisconsin in the employment border battle for 204 of the last 216 months dating back to February 1997. Wisconsin only managed a lower unemployment rate than Minnesota for the 12 months of 2008 during this 18-year span.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting