Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics

Through the Dark-Colored Lenses of Mark Dayton

Bookmark and Share

"Death," "dead end," "decline" and "grim future" were but a few of the words and phrases Minnesota's governor used to frame the problems of his state and country

markdayton10.jpgThe subject of Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton's speech at the Humphrey School of Public Affairs Wednesday afternoon was on the challenges and opportunities facing the Gopher State.

However, while the DFL governor did highlight a few success stories taking place in the Gopher State, the majority of his 25-minute talk was peppered with pessimism and examples of governmental policy gone awry - particularly on the economic front.

Dayton's doom and gloom rhetoric was meant, of course, for a larger purpose, and that was to gather support for the state (and government generally) to back his policy agenda.

That agenda was outlined at the end of his speech in three main points: higher taxes for the wealthy, greater investing in education, and increasing investments in infrastructure.

But before the governor outlined this agenda moving forward, he referenced historical examples of fallen empires and made dire predictions about the potential demise of the United States.

All the while, Dayton connected the past to the present to the future with a string of dire, pessimistic words and phrases.

Here is a sampling:

Rough ride
Challenging era
Fiscal irresponsibility
Great squandering
Draconian cuts
Loss of revenue
Downward spiral
Further in arrears
The hole we've dug
Can't escape
Hitting people between the eyes
Don't have any control
Out of reach
Institutions will collapse
Hitting your head against a stone wall
Falling behind
Terrible and tragic oversight
Looking at a grim future
Dead end

On the state of politics, Dayton summed up that history proves "No good deed goes unpunished, no misdeed goes unrewarded."

And on policy, should his proposed budget reforms not be enacted: "In my view, this unwillingness to pay taxes - and seen as a threat to our freedom and our liberty and our way of life - to me is going to be the death of this country if it's not corrected."

While Dayton received a warm reception at the University despite the pervasive negative tone of his speech, it is clear the governor does not subscribe to the Ronald Reagan school of public speaking.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Does Anyone Care About Minnesota? (Polling the 2012 Presidential Race)
Next post: Withdrawn Anti-Obama Kansas Ballot Challenge Continues Major Party Ballot Access Streak


  • Eric,

    I came across your blog post while researching the Governor's HHH School of Public Affairs Lecture to Policy Fellows on September 12, 2012. Do you know if the Lecture exists in written form?

    I linked to your post in one of my own published a bit earlier tonight.



    John Gilmore

  • Where can I listen to Dayton's speech?

  • Leave a comment

    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.

    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    Humphrey School Sites
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Foreign affairs
    Race and ethnicity
    Third parties