Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Through the Dark-Colored Lenses of Mark Dayton

Bookmark and Share

"Death," "dead end," "decline" and "grim future" were but a few of the words and phrases Minnesota's governor used to frame the problems of his state and country

markdayton10.jpgThe subject of Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton's speech at the Humphrey School of Public Affairs Wednesday afternoon was on the challenges and opportunities facing the Gopher State.

However, while the DFL governor did highlight a few success stories taking place in the Gopher State, the majority of his 25-minute talk was peppered with pessimism and examples of governmental policy gone awry - particularly on the economic front.

Dayton's doom and gloom rhetoric was meant, of course, for a larger purpose, and that was to gather support for the state (and government generally) to back his policy agenda.

That agenda was outlined at the end of his speech in three main points: higher taxes for the wealthy, greater investing in education, and increasing investments in infrastructure.

But before the governor outlined this agenda moving forward, he referenced historical examples of fallen empires and made dire predictions about the potential demise of the United States.

All the while, Dayton connected the past to the present to the future with a string of dire, pessimistic words and phrases.

Here is a sampling:

Rough ride
Difficult
Decline
Challenging era
Fiscal irresponsibility
Recessionary
Great squandering
Gimmicks
Draconian cuts
Drastic
Death
Peril
Loss of revenue
Downward spiral
Further in arrears
The hole we've dug
Adversity
Can't escape
Diminished
Regressivity
Hitting people between the eyes
Upset
Don't have any control
Out of reach
Unsustainability
Institutions will collapse
Mismatch
Burden
Hitting your head against a stone wall
Falling behind
Terrible and tragic oversight
Looking at a grim future
Dead end

On the state of politics, Dayton summed up that history proves "No good deed goes unpunished, no misdeed goes unrewarded."

And on policy, should his proposed budget reforms not be enacted: "In my view, this unwillingness to pay taxes - and seen as a threat to our freedom and our liberty and our way of life - to me is going to be the death of this country if it's not corrected."

While Dayton received a warm reception at the University despite the pervasive negative tone of his speech, it is clear the governor does not subscribe to the Ronald Reagan school of public speaking.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Does Anyone Care About Minnesota? (Polling the 2012 Presidential Race)
Next post: Withdrawn Anti-Obama Kansas Ballot Challenge Continues Major Party Ballot Access Streak

2 Comments


  • Eric,

    I came across your blog post while researching the Governor's HHH School of Public Affairs Lecture to Policy Fellows on September 12, 2012. Do you know if the Lecture exists in written form?

    I linked to your post in one of my own published a bit earlier tonight.

    http://conservativeminnesotans.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-unbearable-lightness-of-gov-mark.html

    Regards,

    John Gilmore

  • Where can I listen to Dayton's speech?

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Gender Equality in the US House: A State-by State Quarter-Century Report Card (1989-2014)

    A study of 5,325 congressional elections finds the number of female U.S. Representatives has more than tripled over the last 25 years, but the rate at which women are elected to the chamber still varies greatly between the states.

    Political Crumbs

    Final Four Has Presidential Approval

    By edging Michigan in the final seconds Sunday, the University of Kentucky guaranteed that one school in the Final Four this year would be located in a state that was not carried by President Barack Obama in 2012. (Connecticut, Florida, and Wisconsin had previously earned Final Four slots over the weekend). Across the 76 Final Fours since 1939, an average of 3.1 schools have been located in states won by the president's ticket during the previous election cycle. All four schools have come from states won by the president 29 times, with the most recent being the 2009 Final Four featuring Connecticut, Michigan State, North Carolina, and Villanova. On 30 occasions three Final Four schools have been located in states won by the president, with two schools 11 times and only one school six times (the most recent being 2012 with Kansas, Kentucky, Louisville, and Ohio State). There has never been a Men's NCAA Division I Final Four in which no schools were located in states carried by the president's ticket.


    Three for the Road

    A new Rasmussen Poll shows Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker in a dead heat with likely 2014 Democratic nominee Mary Burke. Walker is seeking to win his third consecutive election after prevailing in 2012's recall contest. Eight of his predecessors accomplished this feat: Republicans Lucius Fairchild (in 1869), Jeremiah Rusk (1886), Robert La Follette (1904), Emanuel Philipp (1918), John Blaine (1924), Walter Kohler (1954), Warren Knowles (1968), and Tommy Thompson (1994). Three others Badger State governors lost on their third campaign: Democrat George Peck (1894), Progressive Philip La Follette (1938), and Republican Julius Heil (1942). One died in office before having the opportunity to win a third contest (GOPer Walter Goodland in 1947) while another resigned beforehand (Democrat Patrick Lucey in 1977 to become Ambassador to Mexico). Overall Wisconsin gubernatorial incumbents have won 35 of 47 general election contests, or 74.5 percent of the time.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting