Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Will Iowa Republicans Lose Every US House Seat for the First Time in History?

Bookmark and Share

Republicans have won at least one U.S. House seat from the Hawkeye State since 1856

tomlatham10.jpgWhen reapportionment reared its ugly head after the 2010 U.S. Census - cutting Iowa's seventh seat in the nation's lower legislative chamber since 1930 - that meant five incumbents would be fighting for four seats come November 2012.

And while it is certainly possible Democrats could be down a seat after Election Day, there is also a chance history might be made on the Republican side.

A Smart Politics review of Iowa U.S. House elections data finds that Republicans are at risk of failing to win a congressional district seat in a general election for the first time since the founding of the party.

(Note: In the 1854 cycle, just months after the formation of the Republican Party, the GOP did not field a candidate in both of the state's congressional races as Whig James Thorington ran and won in the 2nd CD. The 1856 cycle was the first in which Republicans began fielding candidates in all districts and have won at least one seat ever since).

Overall, Republicans have won 80.3 percent of the 656 general and special U.S. House races in Iowa history (527) dating back to 1846.

Democrats have won just 124 (18.9 percent) with other parties winning five (0.8 percent).

Democratic incumbents Bruce Braley and David Loebsack are heavily favored to retain their seats and return to D.C. for their fourth terms from the 1st and 2nd CDs respectively.

In the state's 3rd District, perennial GOP target eight-term Democratic U.S. Representative Leonard Boswell has suffered from an extreme fundraising deficit (by more than a 2:1 margin through June 2012) to nine-term Republican U.S. Representative Tom Latham (pictured at top) in an incumbent vs. incumbent matchup.

However, Roll Call recently moved the race from "leans Republican" to "tossup," and Iowa political observers know all too well the cat-like Boswell may not have used up all nine of his political lives.

But the race that is receiving the lion's share of attention is the 4th CD contest where one of the most outspoken conservative members of the U.S. House, five-term GOPer Steve King, is facing the fight of his life against Iowa's former Democratic First Lady Christie Vilsack.

Unlike Boswell, Vilsack has kept pace with her Republican opponent - with both eclipsing $2 million in total funds by the end of the 2nd quarter of this year.

Most prognosticators still rate the district as leaning Republican, but two new Democratic-sponsored polls found Vilsack within two and three points respectively while a recent Republican-sponsored survey gave King a seven-point advantage.

Obama will likely need to carry the Hawkeye State in order for the GOP to lose both of these races - although even with an Obama victory there is no guarantee Latham and King will lose.

Of course, for Republicans to even be in this vulnerable position says as much about the depletion of seats in Congress Iowa has endured over the last 80 years as the health of the Republican Party in the state.

Iowa's footprint in the U.S. House has been slashed by 64 percent since 1930 from 11 to four seats.

The low-points for GOP representation in the state's U.S. House delegation occurred after the Democratic landslides of 1964 and 1974 when Republicans won just a single seat each cycle (Harold Gross and Chuck Grassley respectively).

The Democratic Party has endured several long droughts in Hawkeye State congressional races, failing to win a single seat from 1856 to 1876 (0 wins, 65 losses), 1894 to 1900 (0 wins, 46 losses), 1916 to 1928 (0 wins, 80 losses), and 1942 to 1954 (0 wins, 57 losses).

Democrats have won a majority of the state's U.S. House seats for three consecutive cycles - the party's longest such streak since the Democratic landslides in 1932, 1934, and 1936.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: From Bowles-Simpson to Simpson-Bowles: Or, the Evolution of Co-Chair Billing
Next post: Rob Sobhani Poised to Crush Maryland US Senate Election Mark

1 Comment


  • I think that anyone who votes for King should have their psych exam following their vote. He is an embarrassment to all Iowans! I am a moderate and vote based on the issues but Rep King seems to have his own agenda. It is time that congress as a whole work together to get done what is best for the country, the state and the people before they worry\vote what is going to get them re-elected...Dem or Repub!

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Which States Own the Best Track Record in Backing Eventual GOP Presidential Nominees?

    Nine states (each with primaries) have an unblemished record in voting for the eventual Republican nominee since 1976 - and not all host contests on the back end of the calendar.

    Political Crumbs

    Evolving?

    When Scott Walker "punted" back in February after being asked if he was comfortable with the idea of evolution he added, "That's a question a politician shouldn't be involved in one way or the other." However, it may very well be a question that is asked at one of the upcoming GOP debates this year. In South Carolina during the first GOP debate in 2012, FOX News' Juan Williams asked Tim Pawlenty, "Do you equate the teaching of creationism with the teaching of evolution as the basis for what should be taught for our nation's schools?" Pawlenty replied, "There should be room in the curriculum for study of intelligent design" but that it was up to the local school districts if it should be in a science class or comparative theory class. At the fourth Republican debate held in California, Jon Huntsman addressed the GOP becoming "anti-science" thusly: "Listen, when you make comments that fly in the face of what 98 out of 100 climate scientists have said, when you call into question the science of evolution, all I'm saying is that, in order for the Republican Party to win, we can't run from science. We can't run from mainstream conservative philosophy."


    73 Months and Counting

    January's preliminary Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers show Minnesota's unemployment rate of 3.7 percent was once again lower than Wisconsin's 5.0 percent. That marks the 73rd consecutive month in which Minnesota has boasted a lower jobless rate than its neighbor to the east dating back to January 2009 including each of the last 67 months by at least one point. The Gopher State has now edged Wisconsin in the employment border battle for 204 of the last 216 months dating back to February 1997. Wisconsin only managed a lower unemployment rate than Minnesota for the 12 months of 2008 during this 18-year span.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting