Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Wisconsinites (Financially) Disengaged from 2012 Presidential Race

Bookmark and Share

Wisconsin is the only battleground state to populate the Bottom 10 for per capita large donor contributions to presidential candidates this cycle

wisconsinseal10.pngWhile the swing state of Wisconsin may be prime territory for political ads and a key state for the Obama and Romney campaigns - with native son Paul Ryan now on the latter's ticket - residents of the Badger State may not be quite as enthused with the campaign so far.

At least as measured by one variable.

For although Wisconsin ranks in the top half of the nation in per capita income, the state ranks 46th in per capita large donor giving to presidential candidates this cycle.

A Smart Politics review of FEC data through August 2012 finds that Wisconsin is the only 'battleground' that ranks in the Bottom 10 states for itemized contributions to 2012 presidential candidates.

Wisconsin residents have contributed $853 per 1,000 residents so far this cycle to Barack Obama, Mitt Romney, and the other ex- and current GOP and third party candidates who launched presidential campaigns.

That comes in at just above half the national statewide average of $1,659 per 1,000 residents and bests only Mississippi at #47 ($809), Indiana at #48 ($804), West Virginia at #49 ($759), and Arkansas at #50 ($696).

In fact, Wisconsin is the only swing state that populates the bottom of the list with North Dakota at #45 ($865), Kentucky at #44 ($886), Alabama at #43 ($917), South Carolina at #42 ($937), South Dakota at #41 ($1,010), and Kansas at #40 ($1,086).

One unusual facet of Wisconsin's placement on this list of campaign donations is its relative wealth vis-à-vis most of the other bottom dwellers.

According to the U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis' March 2012 report, Wisconsin ranks #25 in the nation in per capita personal income in 2011 with Indiana (#41), Alabama (#42), Arkansas (#44), South Carolina (#46), West Virginia (#48), and Mississippi (#50) coming in much lower.

Only North Dakota (#9), South Dakota (#21), and Kansas (#23) rank ahead of Wisconsin on the per capita income list among the stingiest large donor states in the 2012 presidential election cycle.

All this is not to suggest that the other battleground states in the 2012 election are at the very top of fundraising states in the nation.

In fact, only two battleground states crack the Top 10 for per capita large donor funds donated to presidential candidates this cycle: Virginia at #8 ($2,450 per 1,000 residents) and Colorado at #9 ($2,412).

The remaining eight states in the Top 10 are all Democratic and Republican strongholds.

Mitt Romney's home state of Massachusetts leads the way at a rate of $3,573 per 1,000 residents in large donor giving, followed by Connecticut at #2 ($3,551), Vermont at #3 ($2,929), Wyoming at #4 ($2,897), Utah at #5 ($2,742), Maryland at #6 ($2,676), New York at #7 ($2,659), and California at #10 ($2,305).

As for the other swing states, New Hampshire comes in at #11 ($2,208), with Florida at #15 ($2,011), Nevada at #16 ($1,784), Pennsylvania at #27 ($1,460), Michigan at #32 ($1,259), North Carolina at #36 ($1,191), Ohio at #38 ($1,091), and Iowa at #39 ($1,090).

Wisconsin's shallow pockets in the 2012 fundraising game is curious to be sure.

Some might suggest the state was bled dry by the two sets of recall elections that took place in 2011 and 2012.

Or perhaps that the high profile recall process itself - and the untold number of negative campaign ads that flooded the airwaves - have turned voters off to political campaigns.

These are plausible explanations, but not persuasive in a state that consistently ranks among the top in the nation in voter turnout.

So perhaps Wisconsinites are simply savvy political observers and are simply not impressed with the choices on the ballot this time around and are saving their money for another day...

Itemized Contributions to 2012 Presidential Candidates by State

Rank
State
Contributions
Per 1,000
1
Massachusetts
$23,401,154
$3,573.99
2
Connecticut
$12,693,773
$3,551.60
3
Vermont
$1,832,984
$2,929.30
4
Wyoming
$1,633,132
$2,897.55
5
Utah
$7,579,783
$2,742.44
6
Maryland
$15,454,381
$2,676.75
7
New York
$51,538,013
$2,659.60
8
Virginia
$19,606,980
$2,450.56
9
Colorado
$12,132,987
$2,412.51
10
California
$85,882,222
$2,305.32
11
New Hampshire
$2,907,191
$2,208.32
12
Washington
$14,469,371
$2,151.73
13
Texas
$52,091,722
$2,071.61
14
Illinois
$25,865,823
$2,015.94
15
Florida
$37,811,211
$2,011.09
16
Nevada
$4,818,565
$1,784.29
17
New Jersey
$15,509,423
$1,764.06
18
Alaska
$1,241,329
$1,747.78
19
Maine
$2,290,305
$1,724.16
20
New Mexico
$3,484,098
$1,691.98
21
Oregon
$6,316,967
$1,648.88
22
Montana
$1,619,811
$1,637.14
23
Idaho
$2,466,565
$1,573.48
24
Georgia
$15,112,071
$1,559.93
25
Delaware
$1,393,992
$1,552.44
26
Hawaii
$2,012,353
$1,479.34
27
Pennsylvania
$18,549,551
$1,460.32
28
Arizona
$9,300,299
$1,454.99
29
Minnesota
$7,634,263
$1,439.36
30
Oklahoma
$5,197,600
$1,385.53
31
Rhode Island
$1,382,766
$1,313.71
32
Michigan
$12,445,690
$1,259.22
33
Louisiana
$5,639,102
$1,243.91
34
Tennessee
$7,830,379
$1,233.89
35
Missouri
$7,370,065
$1,230.62
36
North Carolina
$11,357,456
$1,191.07
37
Nebraska
$2,071,725
$1,134.36
38
Ohio
$12,588,640
$1,091.20
39
Iowa
$3,323,147
$1,090.86
40
Kansas
$3,098,627
$1,086.05
41
South Dakota
$822,505
$1,010.23
42
South Carolina
$4,335,068
$937.24
43
Alabama
$4,383,002
$917.00
44
Kentucky
$3,848,698
$886.93
45
North Dakota
$581,978
$865.28
46
Wisconsin
$4,855,783
$853.84
47
Mississippi
$2,402,565
$809.68
48
Indiana
$5,214,766
$804.28
49
West Virginia
$1,407,881
$759.79
50
Arkansas
$2,031,864
$696.82
Table compiled by Smart Politics with data culled from the FEC and U.S. Census Bureau. Contributions through August 2012.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Is the Revolution Over? 3rd Party US House Candidacies Fall 22% from 2010
Next post: Gary Johnson's Deepest Fundraising Puddles

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting