Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Rob Sobhani Poised to Crush Maryland US Senate Election Mark

Bookmark and Share

A new poll shows the businessman and independent on pace for a record setting performance for a non-major party candidate in a Maryland U.S. Senate contest

robsobhani10.pngWhile the reelection chances of one-term Maryland Democrat Ben Cardin have universally been declared 'safe' by all major D.C. prognosticators, a strong independent candidacy is hoping to leave his mark on the race and state political history.

Cardin will not only face Republican and ex-Secret Service agent Dan Bongino but also Libertarian candidate Dean Ahmad and independent Rob Sobhani.

A recent poll conducted by Gonzales Research and Marketing Strategies found Cardin barely reaching a majority with 50 percent followed by Bongino with 22 percent and Sobhani with 21 percent. (Note: the poll was conducted of registered voters).

Sobhani, a businessman who is the Chairman and CEO of Caspian Group Holdings, is leveraging those poll results to continue his call on his two major party opponents to include him in the upcoming debates.

But even if he is excluded from the debates, Sobhani's television ads, which characterize the two-party system in D.C. as "broken" and "corrupt," have helped placed him in uncharted territory for independent and third party U.S. Senate candidates in the Old Line State.

A Smart Politics review of the 34 U.S. Senate elections that have been held since popular vote contests began in Maryland in 1913 finds that Rob Sobhani is on pace to crush the state's all-time mark for an independent or third-party candidate of 13 percent.

The 50 percent support for Cardin in the new Gonzales Research poll is about on par with the 54 percent the Democrat received during his 2006 victory over Michael Steele.

At 21 percent, Sobhani is clearly cutting into the support of the Republican Party this cycle.

In addition to touting his independent credentials (and a qualified, self-imposed term limit pledge), Sobhani has taken stands on immigration (enforce current laws, make English the official language), taxes (15 percent flat tax), and spending (cutting government programs) that appears to be resonating with Republican and conservative-leaning independents.

The result is optimism for a campaign in a state that has not generally treated third party and independent candidates warmly over the last century.

Since the state's first direct election contest in 1913, 42 candidates have appeared on the Maryland U.S. Senate ballot other than Democrats and Republicans prior to Sobhani and Ahmad in 2012.

Only one of these candidates has reached double digits, only two have eclipsed the five percent mark, and only four have mustered at least two percent of the vote.

The best showing by an independent or third party candidate is held by George Mahoney, a former Democrat who ran under the American Independent Party banner in 1968.

Mahoney notched 13.1 percent in the 1968 contest - just shy of George Wallace's 14.5 percent at the top of the American Independent ticket in the Old Line State in a race won by Republican Mac Mathias over one-term Democratic incumbent Daniel Brewster.

Mahoney had run for statewide office several times from the Dixiecrat wing of the party with his best showing coming in 1966 when he won a crowded and divided Democratic primary with 30 percent of the vote. The field included a two-term congressman (Carlton Sickles) and Maryland Attorney General (Thomas Finan).

Mahoney then lost to Spiro Agnew by 8.9 points in the general election.

The only other non-major party candidate to win even 5 percent in a Maryland U.S. Senate race was independent George Iverson in 1920.

Iverson notched 5.5 percent of the vote in a six-candidate field won by Republican Ovington Weller over three-term Democratic incumbent John Smith.

In both the 1920 and 1968 races, the percentages of the vote received by Iverson (5.5) and Mahoney (13.1) were greater than the winning victory margins by GOP challengers over Democratic incumbents John Smith (4.0) and Daniel Brewster (8.7) respectively.

Brewster's 22.9-point drop in support from his victory in 1962 (62.0 percent) to his defeat in 1968 (39.1 percent) was due in part to Mahoney who siphoned off the Dixiecrat vote.

The only other two candidates to receive more than 2 percent of the vote in a Maryland U.S. Senate race were independent Bruce Bradley in 1976 (4.6 percent) and Progressive George Wellington in 1913's special election (3.6 percent).

Wellington had previously been elected to one term in the U.S. House and U.S. Senate as a Republican in the 1890s.

Overall, the 42 third party and independent candidates who ran for senate in Maryland prior to 2012 averaged just 1.5 percent of the vote.

Former candidates have included men and women running on the American (1968, 1970), Communist (1932, 1934, 1938, 1940), Constitution (2004, 2010), Green (2004, 2006, 2010), Labor (1914, 1916, 1920, 1922, 1928, 1934, 1938, 1940), Progressive (1913, 1914, 1950), Prohibition (1913, 1914, 1916), Socialist (1913, 1914, 1916, 1920, 1922, 1926, 1928, 1932, 1934, 1938, 1940), Socialist Labor (1932), and Union (1938) party banners.

Independents appeared on the 1920 ballot (two candidates) as well as 1940 and 1976.

Major party candidates have been the only options on the ballot in 16 of these 34 U.S. Senate elections: in 1944, 1946, 1952, 1956, 1958, 1962, 1964, 1974, 1980, 1982, 1986, 1988, 1992, 1994, 1998, and 2000.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Will Iowa Republicans Lose Every US House Seat for the First Time in History?
Next post: US Senate Twitter Rankings: McCain, Sanders, Reid, Paul, Grassley

8 Comments


  • As a Maryland voter I am very impressed with Mr. Sobhani. He seems to really care about people and when you meet him you know he loves Maryland and America.

  • I met Rob the other evening at a Young Democrat's meeting. I was impressed that he would even show up at an event like this. His message resonated with the crowd as he worked the room. We had so many people talking positive after the event.

  • Sohrab Sobhani (his real name as reflected on his ID) is an Iranian who grew up in Iran, attending solely Iranian schools and not a single day in an American school until arrived in this country for his college studies. As widely reflected online he was groomed to be Iran's prime minister when Reza Pahlavi was to return. He is married to an Iranian, supported financially and politically by Iranian (primarily in California), speaks primarily in Farsi throughout the day.

  • Rob Sobhani has an agenda that suggests he doesn't even know what the job of a Senator is. He doesn't need to be elected to pursue the agenda he's promising. He's taking an ego trip at the expense of Maryland's future. If he had any honor he'd drop out of the race and stop pretending to be something he's not.

    He's a perennial loser who is only using the Senate race to attract media attention for himself. Maryland has a serious challenger to Senator Cardin who has built a strong grass roots campaign. Sobhani has bought his way onto the ballot and has bought a bunch of TV time with vague messages, all for his own personal benefit.

    Sobhani is hurting Maryland for his own gain.

  • Where are you getting your erroneous information from? He was clearly born in the U.S and when we did we become a nation that says your heritage can dictate serving this country and its constituents. Your bigotry is obviously from a self-loathing place. I suggest you attack candidates stances on issues rather than their heritage.

  • So?

  • Why should I vote for you when you speak no specifics?

  • Mr. Sobhani is a Ben Cardin plant. Anyone who lives in Maryland knows that for a Republican to win in this state, they need everyone in their party to vote for them plus a double digit amount of Democrats. Mr Sobhani knows he doesn't stand a chance. He's running as a middle of the road "conservative" and will take votes from the true conservative candidate. There is no way he can garner enough support from the Dems to make up the difference. He is handing the election to Ben Cardin at time when the Republicans need to win back the senate to turn around Obama's destructive agenda.

    Thanks Rob, we will remember what you have done. You will go down in the record books as the great spoiler..

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting