Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


The Eyes Have It: Obama Blinks 1,000 Times More than Romney During 1st Debate

Bookmark and Share

The president blinked at a rate of 71 times per minute while speaking during Wednesday's debate - 1,000 times more than Romney (53 per minute)

barackobama05.jpgMitt Romney almost universally received the nod as the winner of the first presidential debate - not simply for scoring the most political points, but also in terms of style.

For while Romney seemed in his element, Barack Obama was criticized for appearing uncomfortable, grim, and dour - and was often caught looking down at his notes, particularly during split-screen shots.

But there was another facet of the president's non-verbal communication that may have contributed to the general feeling of uneasiness Obama projected during the debate.

He blinked too much.

A Smart Politics analysis of the first presidential debate finds that Barack Obama blinked at a rate of 70.8 times per minute while speaking and tallied 1,000 more blinks than Mitt Romney during the broadcast.

Obama blinked 3,020 times while speaking during the 90-minute debate compared to just 2,018 times for Romney.

That calculates to a rate of 70.8 blinks per minute for the president and 52.8 for Romney, and 1,002 more on-camera blinks for the President than the former Massachusetts governor.

Various studies have shown the average person blinks at a rate of approximately 20 to 25 times per minute, so both candidates were batting their eyelids at an elevated rate - with Obama doing so at about three times the average rate.

This non-verbal cue conforms with several observations that have been made about the President's performance on Wednesday - such as the frequent "umms" and "ahhs" he uttered during the debate - as he seemingly struggled to get his bearings and formulate his arguments against Romney who appeared much more focused.

Various external factors can contribute to elevated blinking rates, such as wearing contacts or, in this case, perhaps the bright lights of the staged televised event.

And, of course, some individuals may experience an increased rate simply due to nerves or being placed in an uncomfortable situation.

However, a previous Smart Politics report from a Republican primary presidential debate in January found a wide variation in the blinking rate among the six GOPers on stage, from a low of just 15.9 blinks per minute by Rick Perry to a high of 61.4 by Rick Santorum.

During that debate, Romney clocked in at 33.9 blinks per minute - much lower than his 52.8 on Wednesday.

Obama's peak blinking rate of 88.8 times per minute occurred during one of the few aggressive segments for the President during the debate in which he attacked Romney for changing his tax plan and for suggesting wealthy individuals like Donald Trump were small business owners.

His lowest rate (60.3 blinks per minute) took place when he addressed corporate taxes and tax breaks for companies like Exxon Mobil.

Despite the clear impression that Romney controlled the debate, a Smart Politics report found President Obama received nearly four and one-half more minutes in speaking time than his Republican opponent.

Blinks Per Minute of Speaking Time During the First Presidential Debate

Nominee
Blinks
Minutes
Per Minute
Barack Obama
3,020
42:40
70.8
Mitt Romney
2,018
38:14
52.8
Data excludes the small percentage of time in which candidates were not caught on camera while speaking due to cutaways to other candidates, shots from behind the candidate's head, or distant shots from the back of the auditorium. Data compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Red Ties vs Blue Ties
Next post: Did Bill Clinton Launch the First "Leave Big Bird Alone" Campaign?

4 Comments


  • Not was he blinking to Romney, he was nodding in agreement as Romney told him what a bad job he was doing.

  • the prez was nervous,dumbfounded and dumb.

  • I don't mean to bring race into this, but I think it is important to understand what it means when a black person nods and blinks in the way Obama did during the debate. Granted he was nervous, I even noticed his blinking. But more than that he was pissed. That nod wasn't in agreemenent with Romney, it was "I got you, (expletive)." And I got you does not me "gotcha" or "I comprehend." It means if I wasn't president I would knock the (blank) out of you.

  • He looked like he got called into the principal's office and got taken to task. We'll see if Biden does better tonight.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Which States Own the Best Track Record in Backing Eventual GOP Presidential Nominees?

    Nine states (each with primaries) have an unblemished record in voting for the eventual Republican nominee since 1976 - and not all host contests on the back end of the calendar.

    Political Crumbs

    Evolving?

    When Scott Walker "punted" back in February after being asked if he was comfortable with the idea of evolution he added, "That's a question a politician shouldn't be involved in one way or the other." However, it may very well be a question that is asked at one of the upcoming GOP debates this year. In South Carolina during the first GOP debate in 2012, FOX News' Juan Williams asked Tim Pawlenty, "Do you equate the teaching of creationism with the teaching of evolution as the basis for what should be taught for our nation's schools?" Pawlenty replied, "There should be room in the curriculum for study of intelligent design" but that it was up to the local school districts if it should be in a science class or comparative theory class. At the fourth Republican debate held in California, Jon Huntsman addressed the GOP becoming "anti-science" thusly: "Listen, when you make comments that fly in the face of what 98 out of 100 climate scientists have said, when you call into question the science of evolution, all I'm saying is that, in order for the Republican Party to win, we can't run from science. We can't run from mainstream conservative philosophy."


    73 Months and Counting

    January's preliminary Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers show Minnesota's unemployment rate of 3.7 percent was once again lower than Wisconsin's 5.0 percent. That marks the 73rd consecutive month in which Minnesota has boasted a lower jobless rate than its neighbor to the east dating back to January 2009 including each of the last 67 months by at least one point. The Gopher State has now edged Wisconsin in the employment border battle for 204 of the last 216 months dating back to February 1997. Wisconsin only managed a lower unemployment rate than Minnesota for the 12 months of 2008 during this 18-year span.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting