Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


The Eyes Have It: Obama Blinks 1,000 Times More than Romney During 1st Debate

Bookmark and Share

The president blinked at a rate of 71 times per minute while speaking during Wednesday's debate - 1,000 times more than Romney (53 per minute)

barackobama05.jpgMitt Romney almost universally received the nod as the winner of the first presidential debate - not simply for scoring the most political points, but also in terms of style.

For while Romney seemed in his element, Barack Obama was criticized for appearing uncomfortable, grim, and dour - and was often caught looking down at his notes, particularly during split-screen shots.

But there was another facet of the president's non-verbal communication that may have contributed to the general feeling of uneasiness Obama projected during the debate.

He blinked too much.

A Smart Politics analysis of the first presidential debate finds that Barack Obama blinked at a rate of 70.8 times per minute while speaking and tallied 1,000 more blinks than Mitt Romney during the broadcast.

Obama blinked 3,020 times while speaking during the 90-minute debate compared to just 2,018 times for Romney.

That calculates to a rate of 70.8 blinks per minute for the president and 52.8 for Romney, and 1,002 more on-camera blinks for the President than the former Massachusetts governor.

Various studies have shown the average person blinks at a rate of approximately 20 to 25 times per minute, so both candidates were batting their eyelids at an elevated rate - with Obama doing so at about three times the average rate.

This non-verbal cue conforms with several observations that have been made about the President's performance on Wednesday - such as the frequent "umms" and "ahhs" he uttered during the debate - as he seemingly struggled to get his bearings and formulate his arguments against Romney who appeared much more focused.

Various external factors can contribute to elevated blinking rates, such as wearing contacts or, in this case, perhaps the bright lights of the staged televised event.

And, of course, some individuals may experience an increased rate simply due to nerves or being placed in an uncomfortable situation.

However, a previous Smart Politics report from a Republican primary presidential debate in January found a wide variation in the blinking rate among the six GOPers on stage, from a low of just 15.9 blinks per minute by Rick Perry to a high of 61.4 by Rick Santorum.

During that debate, Romney clocked in at 33.9 blinks per minute - much lower than his 52.8 on Wednesday.

Obama's peak blinking rate of 88.8 times per minute occurred during one of the few aggressive segments for the President during the debate in which he attacked Romney for changing his tax plan and for suggesting wealthy individuals like Donald Trump were small business owners.

His lowest rate (60.3 blinks per minute) took place when he addressed corporate taxes and tax breaks for companies like Exxon Mobil.

Despite the clear impression that Romney controlled the debate, a Smart Politics report found President Obama received nearly four and one-half more minutes in speaking time than his Republican opponent.

Blinks Per Minute of Speaking Time During the First Presidential Debate

Nominee
Blinks
Minutes
Per Minute
Barack Obama
3,020
42:40
70.8
Mitt Romney
2,018
38:14
52.8
Data excludes the small percentage of time in which candidates were not caught on camera while speaking due to cutaways to other candidates, shots from behind the candidate's head, or distant shots from the back of the auditorium. Data compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Red Ties vs Blue Ties
Next post: Did Bill Clinton Launch the First "Leave Big Bird Alone" Campaign?

4 Comments


  • Not was he blinking to Romney, he was nodding in agreement as Romney told him what a bad job he was doing.

  • the prez was nervous,dumbfounded and dumb.

  • I don't mean to bring race into this, but I think it is important to understand what it means when a black person nods and blinks in the way Obama did during the debate. Granted he was nervous, I even noticed his blinking. But more than that he was pissed. That nod wasn't in agreemenent with Romney, it was "I got you, (expletive)." And I got you does not me "gotcha" or "I comprehend." It means if I wasn't president I would knock the (blank) out of you.

  • He looked like he got called into the principal's office and got taken to task. We'll see if Biden does better tonight.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting