Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Town Hall Format Blunts Romney's Rhetoric of Argumentation by Enumeration

Bookmark and Share

Romney rattles off only four of his patented series of bullet-point answers at the Hofstra debate versus 10 in Denver

mittromney13.jpgIn the first presidential debate held nearly two weeks ago at the University of Denver, Romney's rhetorical style stood out in direct opposition to the President - who was given nearly four and one-half more minutes to speak, but struggled to make focused, cogent points.

Meanwhile, Governor Romney - certainly well-rehearsed from 19 debates conducted during the GOP primary phase and over a year giving stump speeches on the campaign trail - rattled off his arguments and policy positions in a confident, rat-a-tat, bullet-point style.

Over his 38-plus minutes of speaking time in Denver, the former Massachusetts governor presented 10 PowerPoint-esque aural slides enumerating plans ranging from as few as two points (how he would replace Obamacare) to as many as five (the broad strokes of his economic plan).

And in case the audience lost track (and perhaps to ensure that he did not), Romney almost always numbered each point along the way.

"My plan has five basic parts. One, get us energy independent, North American energy independent. That creates about four million jobs. Number two, open up more trade, particularly in Latin America; crack down on China if and when they cheat. Number three, make sure our people have the skills they need to succeed and the best schools in the world. We're far away from that now. Number four, get us to a balanced budget. Number five, champion small business."

During the town hall debate Tuesday evening at Hofstra University, Romney attempted to pick up where he left off in Denver in terms of his rhetorical strategy.

When asked by a college student in the opening question what he would do to ensure he could support himself after graduation, Romney replied:

"So what we have to do is two things. We have to make sure that we make it easier for kids to afford college. And also make sure that when they get out of college, there's a job."

But the town hall format - in which it is more difficult for candidates to ignore the questions asked of them than if asked by a moderator - as well as more interruptions by the President made it difficult for Romney to continue to debate utilizing a laundry-list rhetorical format.

It would be well into the second half of the debate before Romney would revisit this argumentative style.

The second time Romney attempted his bullet-point list was in response to a question by an audience member of how he was different from President George W. Bush. In doing so, he discussed his 5-point plan - but was a bit rattled and only remembered to mention four points:

"President Bush and I are -- are different people and these are different times and that's why my five point plan is so different than what he would have done... my policy starts with a very robust policy to get all that energy in North America -- become energy secure. Number two, trade -- I'll crack down on China, President Bush didn't...Number three, I'm going to get us to a balanced budget...And then let's take the last one, championing small business."

Overall, Romney offered only four bullet-point answers during his 40+ minutes of speaking time at Hofstra - six fewer than in Denver - and three of these were abbreviated to just two points each.

Mitt Romney Enumerated Answers During the First Two Presidential Debates

1st Debate
Points
1
2
3
4
5
Economic plan
5
Energy independence
Open trade / tough on China
Increase workforce skills
Balanced budget
Champion small business
Economic plan
4
State control of education
Reduce taxes & exemptions
Energy independence
No tax cut adding to deficit
 
Tax plan
3
No tax cut adding to deficit
No reduction for high income
No tax increase on middle income
 
 
Tax plan
2
No tax cut adding to deficit
Reduce rates & exemptions
 
 
 
How to cut deficit
3
Raise taxes (no)
Cut spending (yes)
Grow economy (yes)
 
 
Where to cut spending
3
Is program worth borrowing from China to pay for it?
Program run more efficiently by states
Make federal govt more efficient
 
 
How to save Medicare
3
No change for current & near-retirees
Young choose Medicare or private plan
Means test benefits for income
 
 
Why repeal Obamacare
4
Too expensive
Cuts Medicare
Unelected board
Hurts job growth
 
Replace Obamacare
2
Cover preexisting conditions
Young stay on family's plan
 
 
 
Role of government
2
Protect life and liberty
Religious tolerance
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2nd Debate
Points
1
2
3
4
5
Financial security for college grads
2
Make college affordable
Creating jobs
 
 
 
Economic plan
4
Energy independence
Open trade / tough on China
Balanced budget
Champion small business
 
Immigration
2
Support legal immigration
Stop illegal immigration
 
 
 
Bring jobs back to USA
2
China abides by fair trade
Make USA attractive to entrepreneurs
 
 
 
Table compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Close Shaves in MN-06
Next post: A Brief History of Presidential Arithmetic

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Kevin McCarthy Becomes Least Tenured Floor Leader in US House History

At less than four terms, McCarthy has served 423 fewer days in the chamber than any floor leader in U.S. House history and almost 10 years less than the average leader.

Political Crumbs

The Second Time Around

Former Republican Congressman Bob Beauprez became the seventh major party or second place gubernatorial candidate in Colorado to get a second chance at the office when he narrowly won his party's nomination last month. Two of the previous six candidates were successful. Democrat Alva Adams lost his first gubernatorial bid to Benjamin Eaton in 1884, but was victorious two years later against William Meyer. Democrat Charles Johnson placed third in 1894 behind Republican Albert McIntyre and Populist incumbent Governor David Waite but returned as the Fusion (Democrat/Populist) nominee in 1898 and defeated GOPer Henry Wolcott. Gubernatorial candidates who received a second chance but lost both general elections include Democrat Thomas Patterson (1888, 1914), Progressive Edward Costigan (1912, 1914), Republican Donald Brotzman (1954, 1956), and Republican David Strickland (1978, 1986).


How Are the Plurality Winners Doing?

Nearly 40 percent of plurality winners of U.S. Senate elections lose their seat in the next election cycle. Will that happen to any of the three such incumbents on the ballot in 2014? Recent polling suggests Democrats Al Franken of Minnesota, Mark Begich of Alaska, and Jeff Merkley of Oregon all currently have an advantage over their nominated/frontrunning GOP opponents, but each is flirting with plurality support once again. Franken led endorsed GOPer Mike McFadden 48 to 42 percent in a new SurveyUSA poll while the polling group showed Merkley with a 50 to 32 percent advantage over Monica Wehby. Begich led each of the three major GOP candidates in last month's PPP survey: 42 to 37 percent over Daniel Sullivan, 41 to 33 percent over Mead Treadwell, and 43 to 27 percent over Joe Miller.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting