Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Ohio: Gerrymandering 1, Obama Coattails 0

Bookmark and Share

With only four Democratic U.S. Representatives elected from Ohio in 2012, the Buckeye State is sending the smallest number and percentage of allies of a newly-elected president to D.C. in state history

ohioseal10.jpgOhio's congressional races made a lot of headlines throughout the 2012 cycle.

After the new census, reapportionment resulted in the state losing two seats and seeing its delegation dwindle for the fifth consecutive decade down to 16 districts.

This resulted in various incumbent-on-incumbent matchups in the primary and general elections, causing one of the delegation's high profile members, former Democratic presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich, to speculate he may bolt to run from the State of Washington instead. (Kucinich would ultimately lose in the 9th CD primary to Marcy Kaptur).

And then there were frequent allegations of gerrymandering when the Republican-controlled legislature drew the new 16 congressional districts, which included a thin, snake-like Democratic-heavy 9th CD that stretched from Toledo in the northwest nearly all the way to Cleveland in the northeast.

(An anti-gerrymandering ballot initiative, to create a 12-person citizen commission to draw congressional and state legislative district lines, was defeated by more than 25 points on Election Day).

All the while, the state was the premiere battleground in the presidential race between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney.

What was the end result of all this madness?

A Smart Politics analysis finds that Ohioans will be sending the lowest number (four) and percentage (25 percent) of U.S. House members from the party of a newly elected president in the Buckeye State across the 47 presidential election cycles since the birth of the modern two-party system in 1828.

Overall, an average of 62 percent of Ohio U.S. Representatives were elected from the same party as the winning presidential candidate, including at least half in 36 of these 47 cycles since 1828.

However, despite Barack Obama winning a majority of the vote statewide, Ohio Democrats only carried four of 16 newly-drawn U.S. House seats, or 25 percent, winning the 3rd (Joyce Beatty), 9th (Marcy Kaptur), 11th (Martha Fudge), and 13th (Tim Ryan) congressional districts.

That sets a new low-water mark in the state, dropping below the Election of 1944 when just six of 23 Democrats won U.S. House seats (26.1 percent) as Franklin Roosevelt was elected to a fourth term.

During that cycle, however, Ohio cast its electoral votes for Republican Thomas Dewey - one of just eight cycles since 1828 in which it did not vote for the winning presidential candidate (along with 1836, 1844, 1848, 1856, 1884, 1892, 1960).

In fact, five of the 10 previous cycles in which Ohio sent less than half of its representatives to D.C. from the party of the winning presidential candidate took place in cycles in which the state backed the losing presidential nominee:

· 1836: voting for Whig William Harrison and electing just 8 of 19 Democrats (42.1 percent)
· 1848: voting for Democrat Lewis Cass and 8 of 21 Whigs (38.1 percent)
· 1856: voting for Republican John Fremont and 8 of 21 Democrats (38.1 percent)
· 1944: voting for Republican Thomas Dewey and 6 of 23 Democrats (26.1 percent)
· 1960: voting for Republican Richard Nixon and 7 of 16 Democrats (30.4 percent)

In addition to 2012, the state also elected less than half of its U.S. House delegation to the winning presidential candidate's party in 1964 (41.7 percent), 1976 (43.5 percent), 1984 (47.6 percent), 1988 (47.6 percent), and 1996 (42.1 percent).

In 1920, Ohio voted Republicans into office in 100 percent of its 22 congressional districts as native Ohioan Warren Harding was elected president.

The Buckeye State also eclipsed the 90 percent mark in 1904 (electing 20 of 21 Republicans, 95.2 percent) and 1936 (22 of 24 Democrats, 91.7 percent).

It should be noted that in the 14 contested congressional districts in 2012, Republican candidates did win a majority of the vote.

Republican U.S. House candidates won 2.31 million votes (51.6 percent) compared to 2.06 million for Democrats (46.1 percent), and a shade over 100K for third parties (2.3 percent).

Speaker of the House John Boehner in the 8th CD and Democrat Marcia Fudge in the 11th CD ran unopposed.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Iceberg: Split-Ticket Voting Leaves GOPers Cold in Two Northern US Senate Races
Next post: Forerunners of the Fiscal Cliff

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Which States Own the Best Track Record in Backing Eventual GOP Presidential Nominees?

Nine states (each with primaries) have an unblemished record in voting for the eventual Republican nominee since 1976 - and not all host contests on the back end of the calendar.

Political Crumbs

Evolving?

When Scott Walker "punted" back in February after being asked if he was comfortable with the idea of evolution he added, "That's a question a politician shouldn't be involved in one way or the other." However, it may very well be a question that is asked at one of the upcoming GOP debates this year. In South Carolina during the first GOP debate in 2012, FOX News' Juan Williams asked Tim Pawlenty, "Do you equate the teaching of creationism with the teaching of evolution as the basis for what should be taught for our nation's schools?" Pawlenty replied, "There should be room in the curriculum for study of intelligent design" but that it was up to the local school districts if it should be in a science class or comparative theory class. At the fourth Republican debate held in California, Jon Huntsman addressed the GOP becoming "anti-science" thusly: "Listen, when you make comments that fly in the face of what 98 out of 100 climate scientists have said, when you call into question the science of evolution, all I'm saying is that, in order for the Republican Party to win, we can't run from science. We can't run from mainstream conservative philosophy."


73 Months and Counting

January's preliminary Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers show Minnesota's unemployment rate of 3.7 percent was once again lower than Wisconsin's 5.0 percent. That marks the 73rd consecutive month in which Minnesota has boasted a lower jobless rate than its neighbor to the east dating back to January 2009 including each of the last 67 months by at least one point. The Gopher State has now edged Wisconsin in the employment border battle for 204 of the last 216 months dating back to February 1997. Wisconsin only managed a lower unemployment rate than Minnesota for the 12 months of 2008 during this 18-year span.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting