Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Study: Governors Have No Pull Helping Presidential Nominees Carry Their State

Bookmark and Share

States have voted more frequently for a presidential nominee of a different party than its sitting governor across 600 contests since 1968; even more so in battleground states

scottwalker11.jpgWith the 2012 election just now appearing in the rear view mirror, campaign coverage has already begun to ramp up for the 2014 cycle - particularly in the dozens of gubernatorial and U.S. Senate races.

But before a bow is put on 2012 - and as a warning shot for those who might read too much into last November's results - Smart Politics takes a moment to highlight one of the ways the media went awry after 2010.

After the Republican tsunami two years ago, numerous broadcast media anchors and analysts stated on air that the GOP gubernatorial pick-ups in several key battleground states would pose a problem for Barack Obama's reelection campaign in 2012.

Purple states such as Florida, Iowa, Michigan, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin all saw Republicans pick-up open seats or knock off Democratic or independent incumbents.

Media anchors, hosts, and analysts such as John King (CNN), Bret Baier (FOX), Joe Trippi (FOX), Gloria Borger (CNN), and Kirsten Powers (FOX) all remarked at the advantage Republicans would receive in the 2012 presidential race as a result of these gubernatorial victories, and the barriers it would place for an Obama reelection victory.

Smart Politics issued a study that challenged these statements and, 24 months before the 2012 election, projected that Barack Obama's reelection fate in no way hinged on which party controlled the governor's mansion in these battleground states.

The study showed there was no correlation between presidential victories in a state and the party of that state's governor over the past 11 presidential election cycles dating back to 1968.

And while the Republican gubernatorial (and state legislative) success stories during the 2010 election cycle may have enabled the GOP to craft more favorable district lines for 2012 legislative races, the impact on which presidential nominee carried these swing states was, once again, non-existent.

Obama did not lose any of the battleground states in which Democrats fell flat in gubernatorial races two years ago.

In fact, almost all of the closest races in the country saw a presidential nominee carry a state with a governor in office from the opposite party - including all seven key GOP gubernatorial pickups in 2010.

Of the 16 states decided by single digits in 2012, 11 voted for the presidential nominee of a party other than its sitting governor, including each of the five states with the narrowest margin of victory.

Florida (#1), Ohio (#2), Virginia (#4), Pennsylvania (#5), Iowa (#8), Nevada (#9), Wisconsin (#10), Michigan (#14), and New Mexico (#16) were all states with Republican governors carried by Barack Obama by single digits.

Meanwhile, North Carolina (#3) and Missouri (#14) have Democratic governors and voted for Mitt Romney.

The only competitive contests in which the state voted for a presidential nominee of the same party as its governor were Colorado (#6), New Hampshire (#7), Minnesota (#11), Georgia (#12), and Arizona (#13).

Overall, across the 600 statewide presidential contests conducted during the 12 election cycles since 1968, states have now voted for a presidential candidate from a different political party than its reigning governor 301 times, or 50.2 percent.

Democratic presidential candidates have won virtually an identical percentage of states in which they have held control of the governor's mansion (36.1 percent) as those in which Republicans had control (32.9 percent).

Meanwhile, Republicans have won 66.8 percent of states with a GOP governor and 63.0 percent of those with a Democratic governor.

Keep in mind - this data includes not simply battleground states, but all states.

The historical data is even more stark for the 12 most commonly cited battlegrounds of the 2012 cycle: Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Wisconsin.

These states have voted for a presidential nominee from a different party than its sitting governor in 78 of 144 instances since 1968, or 54.2 percent of the time, including at least half of the time in North Carolina (75 percent), Minnesota (67 percent), Michigan (58 percent), Ohio (58 percent), Wisconsin (58 percent), Iowa (50 percent), Nevada (50 percent), New Hampshire (50 percent), Pennsylvania (50 percent), and Virginia (50 percent).

And so, in short, if Democrats should pick up the governor's mansion in many of these states in 2014, that fact, in and of itself, is no reason to believe the Party's 2016 nominee is going to have a measurably easier time winning these swing states.

Presidential Vote and Party of Sitting Governor by State, 1968-2012

State
Different
Same
% Different
Connecticut
9
3
75.0
North Carolina
9
3
75.0
Rhode Island
9
3
75.0
Arkansas
8
4
66.7
Maine
8
4
66.7
Massachusetts
8
4
66.7
Minnesota
8
4
66.7
Missouri
8
4
66.7
Montana
8
4
66.7
New Mexico
8
4
66.7
Arizona
7
5
58.3
Kansas
7
5
58.3
Kentucky
7
5
58.3
Michigan
7
5
58.3
Ohio
7
5
58.3
Oklahoma
7
5
58.3
Wisconsin
7
5
58.3
Wyoming
7
5
58.3
Alaska
6
6
50.0
California
6
6
50.0
Georgia
6
6
50.0
Idaho
6
6
50.0
Indiana
6
6
50.0
Iowa
6
6
50.0
Louisiana
6
6
50.0
Mississippi
6
6
50.0
Nevada
6
6
50.0
New Hampshire
6
6
50.0
New Jersey
6
6
50.0
New York
6
6
50.0
North Dakota
6
6
50.0
Pennsylvania
6
6
50.0
South Carolina
6
6
50.0
Virginia
6
6
50.0
West Virginia
6
6
50.0
Alabama
5
7
41.7
Colorado
5
7
41.7
Florida
5
7
41.7
Hawaii
5
7
41.7
Illinois
5
7
41.7
Maryland
5
7
41.7
Nebraska
5
7
41.7
Tennessee
5
7
41.7
Utah
5
7
41.7
Vermont
5
7
41.7
Texas
3
9
25.0
Delaware
2
10
16.7
South Dakota
2
10
16.7
Washington
2
10
16.7
Oregon
1
11
8.3
Total
301
299
50.2
Data compiled by Smart Politics.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Rounds Seeks 1st US Senate Win for ex-South Dakota Governor
Next post: Record Book Near Misses in the 2012 Presidential Election

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting