Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Walter Mondale's Recommendations for Filibuster Reform

Bookmark and Share

What rules could be introduced in the Senate to ensure the filibuster is no longer a 'strategy for hijacking' the chamber and 'demoralizing the country?'

waltermondale10.jpgAt an event at the University of Minnesota's Humphrey School of Public Affairs Tuesday ("Restoring Congress: Time to Fix the Filibuster"), former Vice President Walter Mondale spoke on the pressing need for filibuster reform.

Lamenting how very little legislation can get through the chamber these days, the low number of hours Senators spend deliberating and debating, and the increasing frequency with which the use or threat of use of the filibuster is occurring, Mondale concludes that the filibuster is "paralyzing this country."

Calling the filibuster a "strategy for hijacking - that's all it is" (quoting the late Louisiana Democrat Russell Long), Mondale relayed a colorful history of the parliamentary maneuver in the Senate with stories that referenced the likes of former colleagues Mike Mansfield (D-MT), Jim Allen (D-AL), Strom Thurmond (R-SC), and Everett Dirksen (R-IL).

Mondale offered the following recommendations to limit what he views as the deleterious impact of the filibuster in the chamber today:

1) Reduce the number of votes required to invoke cloture from three-fifths of the body overall (usually 60 members) to 60 percent of those present and voting, presuming there is a quorum.

2) Reduce the number of votes required to invoke cloture from 60 to 55.

Mondale added that he does not want to eliminate the filibuster and simply become a majority-rule institution like the House where deliberation is even more scarce. The former Vice President thinks 60 is too high in the quest to find the magic number that strikes the proper balance between the institution's power to deliberate and the power to paralyze.

3) Eliminate the 'two-track' system.

The two-track filibuster system was implemented under the leadership of Robert Byrd to "reduce the bite of filibuster" whereby the regular business of the Senate is allowed to continue without the filibuster taking place - though the measure being filibustered was still held up.

This would bring back the 'talking filibuster' so that those who are holding up legislation are forced to show up and "tell us why they are paralyzing the country."

By returning to the single-track system, "Everything stops. And they'll have to be on the floor, making those arguments or making the motions, voting on cloture petitions, building up public knowledge of what they're up to."

4) Eliminate the filibuster (or threat of a filibuster) on motions to proceed, which, under current rules, impede the chamber from debating the legislation or a nomination.

5) Putting the onus on those wanting to continue the filibuster. Mondale would change the rules such that 41 votes are needed to continue the filibuster instead of 60 votes needed to end the debate.

As to how these filibuster rules could be implemented, Mondale states it has to be done at the beginning of the Congress - with a majority vote - otherwise, if advanced later in the term, a higher (filibuster-proof) threshold would be required to change the filibuster rules.

For all his serious recommendations, Mondale joked, "You know, this is basically not interesting stuff - but it's life and death down there!"

Mondale concluded, "I think it's demoralizing the country and it encourages immature behavior."

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: 412 US Senators Who Served with Daniel Inouye
Next post: Could Cory Booker Oust Frank Lautenberg?

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Which States Own the Best Track Record in Backing Eventual GOP Presidential Nominees?

Nine states (each with primaries) have an unblemished record in voting for the eventual Republican nominee since 1976 - and not all host contests on the back end of the calendar.

Political Crumbs

Evolving?

When Scott Walker "punted" back in February after being asked if he was comfortable with the idea of evolution he added, "That's a question a politician shouldn't be involved in one way or the other." However, it may very well be a question that is asked at one of the upcoming GOP debates this year. In South Carolina during the first GOP debate in 2012, FOX News' Juan Williams asked Tim Pawlenty, "Do you equate the teaching of creationism with the teaching of evolution as the basis for what should be taught for our nation's schools?" Pawlenty replied, "There should be room in the curriculum for study of intelligent design" but that it was up to the local school districts if it should be in a science class or comparative theory class. At the fourth Republican debate held in California, Jon Huntsman addressed the GOP becoming "anti-science" thusly: "Listen, when you make comments that fly in the face of what 98 out of 100 climate scientists have said, when you call into question the science of evolution, all I'm saying is that, in order for the Republican Party to win, we can't run from science. We can't run from mainstream conservative philosophy."


73 Months and Counting

January's preliminary Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers show Minnesota's unemployment rate of 3.7 percent was once again lower than Wisconsin's 5.0 percent. That marks the 73rd consecutive month in which Minnesota has boasted a lower jobless rate than its neighbor to the east dating back to January 2009 including each of the last 67 months by at least one point. The Gopher State has now edged Wisconsin in the employment border battle for 204 of the last 216 months dating back to February 1997. Wisconsin only managed a lower unemployment rate than Minnesota for the 12 months of 2008 during this 18-year span.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting