Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Strickland Out in 2014 Following 2nd Biggest Incumbent Tumble in Ohio History

Bookmark and Share

Only one other governor has suffered a bigger decline in support in a reelection bid than Strickland in 2010 out of 40 such gubernatorial incumbents since the birth of the two-party system 180+ years ago

tedstrickland10.jpgFormer Ohio Governor Ted Strickland's early-in-the-cycle announcement Tuesday that he would not challenge Republican John Kasich to win back his old job next year clears the path for other Democratic candidates to enter the 2014 gubernatorial field.

Strickland, who won the state's highest elected office in 2006 after a five-term run in Congress from Ohio's 6th CD, was expected to be a strong candidate against Kasich if he had chosen to run after losing by just 2.0 points in the last electoral cycle.

Despite that narrow loss, Strickland's 2010 reelection campaign nonetheless remains one of the poorest showings among gubernatorial incumbents in Ohio history.

A Smart Politics analysis of Ohio election results finds that Ted Strickland endured the second biggest decline in support out of 40 gubernatorial incumbents running for reelection since the birth of the modern two-party system in 1828.

Strickland won 60.5 percent of the vote in his victorious 2006 campaign against then Secretary of State Ken Blackwell - taking advantage of both a general Democratic wave sweeping the nation as well as statewide concerns for the GOP after scandal-plagued Governor Bob Taft was convicted of multiple misdemeanors for failing to disclose gifts from lobbyists.

Four years later, the general election battle between two former members of Congress saw Strickland's statewide support drop by 13.5 points to just 47.0 percent for the second biggest tumble in Ohio history.

The only bigger plummet in a gubernatorial reelection campaign over the last 180+ years came in 1962 when Democrat Michael DiSalle faced Jim Rhodes.

Four years prior, DiSalle had defeated Republican incumbent William O'Neill with 56.9 percent of the vote - in what was a rematch of the 1956 gubernatorial election that O'Neill had won with a nearly identical 56.0 percent.

In 1962, only 41.1 percent of Ohio voters backed DiSalle in his matchup against Rhodes, for a drop of 15.8 points.

Strickland's 47.0 percent of the vote in 2010 is also the eighth lowest percentage won by an Ohio governor in a reelection campaign during the two-party era.

The 41.1 percent won by DiSalle in 1962 remains the low-water mark.

It is not unusual for Ohio gubernatorial incumbents to lose support on their second (or third) go-around with 22 of 40 seeing their vote percentage decrease.

Of the 15 governors who lost reelection, 14 saw a decline in support from their previous victorious campaign, with only Democrat James Cox seeing an uptick in support from 41.7 percent in 1912 (with a significant vote for Progressive Party nominee Arthur Garford depressing his tally) and 43.7 percent in his 1914 loss to Republican Frank Willis.

Of the 25 governors who won a second (or third or fourth) consecutive term, seven saw a decline in voter support.

Strickland was the first Ohio governor since 1974 to fail to win in his reelection bid, when Democrat John Gilligan managed to lose to former GOP Governor Jim Rhodes during the massive Democratic wave following Watergate.

Note: Governor Allen Trimble also saw a substantial decline in support in his (victorious) reelection contest in 1828, but this analysis excludes that race from the data above as his previous 1826 victory (against three Democratic-Republican candidates) took place before the birth of the traditional two-party system.

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Army 9, Navy 7?
Next post: The Literary Namesakes of US Congressmen

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

No Free Passes: States With 2 Major Party Candidates in Every US House Race

Indiana has now placed candidates from both major parties on the ballot in a nation-best 189 consecutive U.S. House races, with New Hampshire, Minnesota, Idaho, and Montana also north of 100 in a row.

Political Crumbs

Gubernatorial Highs and Lows

Two sitting governors currently hold the record for the highest gubernatorial vote ever received in their respective states by a non-incumbent: Republican Matt Mead of Wyoming (65.7 percent in 2010) and outgoing GOPer Dave Heineman of Nebraska (73.4 percent in 2006). Republican Gary Herbert of Utah had not previously won a gubernatorial contest when he notched a state record 64.1 percent for his first victory in 2010, but was an incumbent at the time after ascending to the position in 2009 after the early departure of Jon Huntsman. Meanwhile, two sitting governors hold the record in their states for the lowest mark ever recorded by a winning gubernatorial candidate (incumbent or otherwise): independent-turned-Democrat Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island (36.1 percent in 2010) and Democrat Terry McAuliffe of Virginia (47.8 percent in 2013).


An Idaho Six Pack

Two-term Idaho Republican Governor Butch Otter only polled at 39 percent in a recent PPP survey of the state's 2014 race - just four points ahead of Democratic businessman A.J. Balukoff. Otter's low numbers reflect his own struggles as a candidate (witness his weak primary win against State Senator Russ Fulcher) combined with the opportunity for disgruntled Idahoans to cast their votes for one of four third party and independent candidates, who collectively received the support of 12 percent of likely voters: Libertarian John Bujak, the Constitution Party's Steve Pankey, and independents Jill Humble and Pro-Life (aka Marvin Richardson). The six candidate options in a gubernatorial race sets an all-time record in the Gem State across the 46 elections conducted since statehood. The previous high water mark of five candidates was reached in seven previous cycles: 1902, 1904, 1908, 1912, 1914, 1966, and 2010.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting