Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Michele Bachmann Jeopardy! Curse Continues

Bookmark and Share

Every contestant who has correctly answered clues about Minnesota's controversial Congresswoman failed to win their match including the latest in the Teen Tournament on Friday

MicheleBachmann15.jpgFor the fourth time since launching her 2012 presidential campaign, Minnesota Republican Congresswoman Michele Bachmann's name came up as part of the clue on the syndicated game show Jeopardy!

And on each of these four occasions, the contestant to ring in and provide the correct answer (that is, question) demonstrating their Bachmann knowledge failed to win the match.

On Friday - during the third quarterfinal game of the annual Teen Tournament - the $2,000 clue in a 'Double Jeopardy' category called, "113th Congress," read:

"Rep. Michele Bachmann says she formed this caucus to get Congress back to obeying the Constitution."

Seventeen year old high school senior Olivia Hummer from Covina, California rang in and correctly asked, "What is the Tea Party?"

This was the second time Representative Bachmann's name came up during a 'Double Jeopardy' round, and the first time it has been associated with a highly valued $2,000 clue.

The congresswoman's previous 'appearances' were:

· On June 15, 2011, for the $800 clue in the "All Politics Is Local" category: "In 2011 this congresswoman from Minnesota's 6th district gave a State of the Union rebuttal on behalf of the Tea Party." ("Who is Michele Bachmann?")

· On January 26, 2012, for the $400 clue in the "Child rearing" category: "Michele Bachmann gave her biological children this schooling; the state wouldn't let her do it with her foster kids." (What is home schooling?)

· On July 6, 2012, for the $1,200 clue in the "News of the 2010s" cateogry: "She ended her presidential campaign right after the 2012 Iowa Caucuses." ("Who is Michele Bachmann?")

Unfortunately, teen contestant Olivia Hummer - and each of the previous three contestants who rang in correctly for Bachmann clues - met the same fate Friday as the congresswoman during her abbreviated presidential run - they all lost.

· In June 2011, challenger John Mingey, a physician from Erie, Pennsylvania, finished in last place with $4,600.

· In January 2012, one-time defending champion Kirby Burnett, a poker dealer from Prior Lake, Minnesota, lost his crown with a last place finish of $13,800.

· In July 2012, challenger Henry Doering, a retired public defender from Palm Springs, California, also came in last place with $4,400.

On Friday, Miss Hummer ended up in second place with $7,800 after entering "Final Jeopardy" in the lead with an $800 advantage.

And so, the Bachmann curse continues...

(Other names to come up along side Bachmann in the "113th Congress" category Friday were 30-term Michigan U.S. Representative John Dingell in the $800 clue and newly elected Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren for $1,600).

Follow Smart Politics on Twitter.

Previous post: Scott Brown: The Return of the King?
Next post: Duckworth, Castro Lead House Freshman Class in Early Media Buzz

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Slam Dunk: Will 36 Record Presidential Winning Streaks Continue in 2016?

Three-dozen states are currently in the midst of their longest Democratic or Republican presidential winning streaks.

Political Crumbs

73 Months and Counting

January's preliminary Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers show Minnesota's unemployment rate of 3.7 percent was once again lower than Wisconsin's 5.0 percent. That marks the 73rd consecutive month in which Minnesota has boasted a lower jobless rate than its neighbor to the east dating back to January 2009 including each of the last 67 months by at least one point. The Gopher State has now edged Wisconsin in the employment border battle for 204 of the last 216 months dating back to February 1997. Wisconsin only managed a lower unemployment rate than Minnesota for the 12 months of 2008 during this 18-year span.


Two Dakotas, One Voice?

For each of the last 24 presidential elections since 1920, North and South Dakota have voted in unison - casting their ballots for the same nominee. For 21 of these cycles (including each of the last 12 since 1968) Republicans carried the Dakotas with just three cycles going to the Democrats (1932, 1936, and 1964). This streak stands in contrast to the first few decades after statehood when North and South Dakota supported different nominees in four of the first seven cycles. North Dakota narrowly backed Populist James Weaver in 1892 while South Dakota voted for incumbent Republican Benjamin Harrison. In 1896, it was North Dakota backing GOPer William McKinley while South Dakota supported Democrat William Jennings Bryan by less than 200 votes. North Dakota voted Democratic in 1912 and 1916 supporting Woodrow Wilson while South Dakota cast its Electoral College votes for Progressive Teddy Roosevelt and Republican Charles Hughes respectively.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting